The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Canada Pulls out (and it feels good) https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7889 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Wwen [ Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Canada Pulls out (and it feels good) |
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireSt ... l-15142091 Kyoto Treaty? We were just kidding. Lolz. |
Author: | Müs [ Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Heh, its not like its actually a useful thing. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Good for them. |
Author: | Hannibal [ Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Obvious political rhetoric aside, I'm glad some are seeing this as the pipe dream it was. |
Author: | Talya [ Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:47 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'm elated. Now if they'd only get rid of that stupid emissions test for cars every two years. |
Author: | Lex Luthor [ Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:27 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Preservation of natural areas and wildlife, saving endangered animals, preventing air pollution, and so on are environmental causes that are more worthwhile than global warming. |
Author: | Müs [ Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Talya wrote: I'm elated. Now if they'd only get rid of that stupid emissions test for cars every two years. Here, we have to do ours every year. Its such a scam. |
Author: | Lex Luthor [ Wed Dec 14, 2011 12:58 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I think the motive is good at least for inspection stickers. I don't want poor air quality. |
Author: | Müs [ Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Lex Luthor wrote: I think the motive is good at least for inspection stickers. I don't want poor air quality. Every Year. New vehicles are not exempt. I can understand for something that's maybe 10+ years old... but a brand new vehicle? Ridiculous. |
Author: | Stathol [ Thu Dec 15, 2011 12:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Canada Pulls out (and it feels good) |
Kyoto is serious business, eh? Trudeau calls Kent a 'piece of sh**' in House of Commons |
Author: | Rynar [ Thu Dec 15, 2011 1:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Canada Pulls out (and it feels good) |
Stathol wrote: Kyoto is serious business, eh? Trudeau calls Kent a 'piece of sh**' in House of Commons Man, we sure do have a ridiculous hat. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Lex Luthor wrote: Preservation of natural areas and wildlife, saving endangered animals, preventing air pollution, and so on are environmental causes that are more worthwhile than global warming. Indeed. I'm all for good stewardship of creation. Most of the HIGCC rhetoric is not about that. It's about control. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Müs wrote: Lex Luthor wrote: I think the motive is good at least for inspection stickers. I don't want poor air quality. Every Year. New vehicles are not exempt. I can understand for something that's maybe 10+ years old... but a brand new vehicle? Ridiculous. I have a Federally certified Low-Emissions Vehicle and I have to go through this BS every 2 years too. Absolute scam. |
Author: | Xequecal [ Fri Dec 16, 2011 9:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Rorinthas wrote: Lex Luthor wrote: Preservation of natural areas and wildlife, saving endangered animals, preventing air pollution, and so on are environmental causes that are more worthwhile than global warming. Indeed. I'm all for good stewardship of creation. Most of the HIGCC rhetoric is not about that. It's about control. If only that was actually true. Ever seen The Day After Tomorrow? The average European really believes that something like that will happen, because of global warming. Europe is a place where private companies will ask the general public for donations to reduce their greenhouse emissions, and people will send them money. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Canada Pulls out (and it feels good) |
I have no problem with that, Xeq as long as the gov isn't forcing them to do so. Personally that doesn't interest me. I don't drive more car than I need, I reuse my plastic bags and containers, recycle my pop cans and keep an eye on my thermostat. I do these things more for the benefit of my own resources though. The fact they are good environmentally is a bonus. |
Author: | Elmarnieh [ Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Xequecal wrote: Rorinthas wrote: Lex Luthor wrote: Preservation of natural areas and wildlife, saving endangered animals, preventing air pollution, and so on are environmental causes that are more worthwhile than global warming. Indeed. I'm all for good stewardship of creation. Most of the HIGCC rhetoric is not about that. It's about control. If only that was actually true. Ever seen The Day After Tomorrow? The average European really believes that something like that will happen, because of global warming. Europe is a place where private companies will ask the general public for donations to reduce their greenhouse emissions, and people will send them money. LOL their priorities are all weird. |
Author: | Vindicarre [ Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Rorinthas wrote: Lex Luthor wrote: Preservation of natural areas and wildlife, saving endangered animals, preventing air pollution, and so on are environmental causes that are more worthwhile than global warming. Indeed. I'm all for good stewardship of creation. Most of the HIGCC rhetoric is not about that. It's about control. ...and money. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |