The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Mookhow, can you prevent this site from being viewed in AZ? https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=8423 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Mookhow, can you prevent this site from being viewed in AZ? |
Because if you can't, we all need to delete all our posts lest we go to jail. Gizmodo wrote: One of the Internet's basic tenets—the right to be as much of a myopic, infantile asshat as humanly possible—is currently under attack in Arizona. A sweeping update to the state's telecommunications harrasment bill could make naughty, angry words a Class 1 misdemeanor. Or worse.
It's a dangerous precedent, yet another bill written and supported by legislators who fundamentally don't understand the nature of the internet. And I'm not just being a, well, you know. Arizona House Bill 2549 passed both legislative houses last Thursday and is now awaiting approval from Arizona's governor Brewer. The statute states that: Quote: "It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use a ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person." Emphasis added. If the electronic devices and means are employed to stalk a victim, the penalty bumps up to a Class 3 felony. For those not intimately familiar with Arizona penal law, a Class 1 misdemeanor is punishable by a $2,500 fine and up to six months in jail (it's the most aggressive misdemeanor charge the state can bring). A Class 3 felony, meanwhile, carries a minimum sentence of 2.5 years for non-dangerous offenders with no prior record. And a max of 25 years in jail. Opponents of the bill argue that the wording is overly broad and could easily be interpreted to include not just one-on-one communications but public forums like 4Chan, Reddit, and anywhere else that allows commenting. You thought the banhammer was bad? Try handcuffs. It could also have a chilling effect on free speech by prohibiting shocking or "profane" language online. And since the bill stipulates that the offense only has to occur on Arizona soil (since a Facebook comment is definitely a geographic place, right?) that basically puts the entire Internet on notice. The bill's supporters argue that the steps are necessary to prevent online bullying. Despite the public outcry, the bill has seen very little resistance from elected officials. However, given how well Arizona's other recent, short-lived, and generally draconian propositions—-including its [urlhttp://gizmodo.com/5815031/lulzsec-dumps-classified-arizona-police-documents]racial profiling[/url], anti-gay adoption, and anti-immigration bills—-have fared, House Bill 2549 might not be a law for long, assuming Governor Brewer even signs it. In the mean time, feel free to leave your thoughts on the matter on Brewer's Facebook page. You know, while it's still legal. (Arizona State House of Reps via CBLDF) |
Author: | Arathain Kelvar [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 8:54 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Oy. |
Author: | Micheal [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 8:55 am ] |
Post subject: | |
We'll be out after a few years when the new supreme court finds it unconstitutional. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:09 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I mean, I get why they think they need to make this law, because "we" (meaning misguided authoritarian legislators with no concept of what the rule of law means) want to take a zero tolerance stance on "cyber-bullying," but holy ****, way to make 50% of 80% of the population's days illegal... |
Author: | Corolinth [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:44 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I think we should just ban legislators from the Internet. |
Author: | Kairtane [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 3:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Corolinth wrote: I think we should just ban legislators from the Internet. Seconded |
Author: | shuyung [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 3:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Well, we can do that with their professional access, but personal access would be tricky. |
Author: | Elmarnieh [ Wed Apr 04, 2012 4:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Corolinth wrote: I think we should just ban legislators. I am interested in your newsletter. |
Author: | Stathol [ Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mookhow, can you prevent this site from being viewed in |
Quote: "It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use a ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person." Allow me to be the first to suggest that the Arizona legislature can go **** itself. |
Author: | Müs [ Sat Apr 07, 2012 5:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mookhow, can you prevent this site from being viewed in |
Stathol wrote: Quote: "It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use a ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person." Allow me to be the first to suggest that the Arizona legislature can go **** itself. Two state senators, one cup? Tubcongress? Governot.se? |
Author: | Colphax [ Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mookhow, can you prevent this site from being viewed in |
Arizona politics these days are extremely embarrassing in general these days, on all levels. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Mookhow, can you prevent this site from being viewed in |
Colphax wrote: Arizona politics these days are extremely embarrassing in general these days, on all levels. Please report to the Department of Redundancy Department. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |