The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 11:11 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:25 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ ... 1839.story

I can't believe they actually went through with it.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:41 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Why Mus? It's been ten years in the making since the big attack on tobacco.

First they came for the smokers but I wasnt a smoker.

Then they came for the fat people...

My guess is mandatory excercise is next or football.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:44 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
I suppose it's too much to hope for that this idiocy drives people out of NYC and Chicago and thereby weakens their political power.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:45 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
so as of this act... New York officially joins my list of places that can lick a sweaty, unwashed, summertime-humidity-in-the-south, diseased taint

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Last edited by darksiege on Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:47 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
darksiege wrote:
so as of this act... New York officially joins my list of places that can lick a sweaty unwashed summertime humidity in the south diseased taint


A what?

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:48 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
I think this is a good thing.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:58 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Diamondeye wrote:
darksiege wrote:
so as of this act... New York officially joins my list of places that can lick a sweaty unwashed summertime humidity in the south diseased taint


A what?


Some people lose their marbles when they get angry.

DS loses his commas.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:00 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Diamondeye wrote:
darksiege wrote:
so as of this act... New York officially joins my list of places that can lick a sweaty unwashed summertime humidity in the south diseased taint


A what?



Let me see if I can possibly string it together in a somewhat less confusing manner....

New York has joined the illustrious ranks of those places that needs to lick a sweaty, diseased and unwashed taint that is heavily modified by a good summertime humidity in a southern climate region (96+% humidity).

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:04 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Oh, ok. taint was the noun. I thought your sentence got abruptly chopped off because you got distracted and hit submit or something and "taint" was referring to something else that was tainted.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:13 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Diamondeye wrote:
Oh, ok. taint was the noun. I thought your sentence got abruptly chopped off because you got distracted and hit submit or something and "taint" was referring to something else that was tainted.


yes sir, apologies. I am really tired right now.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:23 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Lenas wrote:
I think this is a good thing.

DS's taint?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:26 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Maybe I was right all along!

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:39 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
I would thank you kindly to remember that my taintal region is not part of this discussion....

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:44 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
darksiege wrote:
I would thank you kindly to remember that my taintal region is not part of this discussion....


Yeah, we don't have the bandwidth to discuss a region of that magnitude.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:03 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
What's stopping customers from buying two 16oz drinks? If you're going to ban 32oz beverages for the people's own good, you have to stop them from buying that quantity of soda entirely.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Corolinth wrote:
What's stopping customers from buying two 16oz drinks? If you're going to ban 32oz beverages for the people's own good, you have to stop them from buying that quantity of soda entirely.

This is a grave concern. Clearly, we need to track daily drink purchases through a centrallized database.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:11 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Corolinth wrote:
What's stopping customers from buying two 16oz drinks? If you're going to ban 32oz beverages for the people's own good, you have to stop them from buying that quantity of soda entirely.


Nothing, but you know that. This is for people literally too stupid to know how unhealthy large drinks like that are; the people that order them every day for lunch and then complain when they're fat and diabetic.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:13 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Why can't that be on them?

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:15 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Who will just go refill more often, or order another drink. It's not like they won't notice they're drinking half as much.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:31 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
The majority of fast food is taken to go, so no refills there. The net result is people that upgrade to a "large for only 30 cents more!" are drinking half as many calories as they would otherwise.

Rorinthas wrote:
Why can't that be on them?

It can be, and it is. Maybe people will start buying multiple drinks. I find it hard to get upset about something that will help people more than hurt them, though. In all honestly, 32-64oz drinks should have never been allowed in the first place. They're part of the reason that the USA is (disgustingly) two-thirds overweight.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Lenas wrote:
It can be, and it is. Maybe people will start buying multiple drinks. I find it hard to get upset about something that will help people more than hurt them, though. In all honestly, 32-64oz drinks should have never been allowed in the first place. They're part of the reason that the USA is (disgustingly) two-thirds overweight.



And?

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Last edited by Nitefox on Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
So Lenas,

Are you in favor of banning Alcohol for people who are too stupid to not drink and drive, or people who are too stupid to know it's ruining their liver and their relationships?

Are you in favor of banning cigarettes for people who are too stupid to know that smoking causes cancer?

There is absolutely no difference.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:48 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
There is a difference. Soda isn't being banned, just a particular size of consumption and only when sold in places also serving food. You're all smart enough to recognize that this is not anywhere near a ban on soda. It's frustrating that I'm even getting questioned about banning alcohol or cigarettes, because it's not the same **** thing. BARS ARE ALREADY REQUIRED TO NOT SERVE YOU ALCOHOL IF YOU'VE HAD TOO MUCH. Who determines what too much is? Oh, right, the gov't.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:40 am
Posts: 3188
I don't smoke, yet I sigh and shake my head every time one of those heavy-handed "Stop smoking, losers!" ads comes on the television or radio. If people want to legitmately stop, sure, help them get the information and assistance they need. For the ones that don't? STFU.

I made the switch to diet cola over a year ago. And I still feel the same way about this law as I do the methods in place to "force" people to stop smoking.

If people want to be "unhealthy" (and I'm using quotes here because even what constitutes as a healthy person is still a grey area), then it is their freedom and choice to do so. But I suppose this really has absolutely nothing AT ALL to do with wanting people to get healthier. It's all about looking good on a political stage. And when people limit freedoms just to make themselves look good, then everybody loses.

_________________
Les Zombis et les Loups-Garous!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:06 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
I predict that this will have exactly zero impact on obesity in NY.

But even if I'm wrong, I'd rather deal with an obesity "epidemic" than a nanny state.

By the way, when did we stop having problems and start having epidemics? I'm guessing it was around the same time that we started declaring war on social issues.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group