The Glade 4.0 https://gladerebooted.net/ |
|
Horde your Twinkies https://gladerebooted.net/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=9391 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | Uncle Fester [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Horde your Twinkies |
http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/16/news/co ... ?hpt=hp_t1 Granted hopefully some company will pick it up. I feel sorry for the non union employee's who did not force it. Spoiler: Hard to belive that the Teamsters were the more responsible of the two unions. Quote: "It is difficult for Teamster members to believe that is what the [Bakers union] Hostess members ultimately wanted to accomplish when they went out on strike," said the Teamsters' statement.
|
Author: | Hopwin [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:54 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Spoiler: |
Author: | Nitefox [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Wow. I read something the other day about this but I thought it was only affecting three of their bakeries. Didn't know it was now the whole company. |
Author: | Diamondeye [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Horde your Twinkies |
You know it's bad when even another union tells you the company can't afford what you want. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Horde your Twinkies |
Way to stay strong bakers union. Hope it was worth it. |
Author: | Kaffis Mark V [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:53 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I think this and maybe a few other high profile closures are really probably pretty healthy as a wake-up call to unions and the country about the way business finance works. |
Author: | DFK! [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Horde your Twinkies |
Rorinthas wrote: Way to stay strong bakers union. Hope it was worth it. I bet that 8% cut that was on the table is looking pretty good compared to the 100% cut they're now going to receive. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Horde your Twinkies |
DFK! wrote: Rorinthas wrote: Way to stay strong bakers union. Hope it was worth it. I bet that 8% cut that was on the table is looking pretty good compared to the 100% cut they're now going to receive. Why? Now they get 99 weeks of unemployment right? That'll carry them to the next congressional election. |
Author: | shuyung [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:27 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Oh unintended consequences, how you do go on. |
Author: | Corolinth [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:52 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Let's bail out Hostess and save all those Union jobs. |
Author: | Ulfynn [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Corolinth wrote: Let's bail out Hostess and save all those Union jobs. We must! To not do so would be as un-American as over-processed, simulated apple pie-like products! |
Author: | darksiege [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
18k jobs lost because some stupid cocksuckers could not just take a small paycut... |
Author: | Xequecal [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Horde your Twinkies |
Hopwin wrote: DFK! wrote: Rorinthas wrote: Way to stay strong bakers union. Hope it was worth it. I bet that 8% cut that was on the table is looking pretty good compared to the 100% cut they're now going to receive. Why? Now they get 99 weeks of unemployment right? That'll carry them to the next congressional election. In the vast majority of states, you're not eligible for unemployment benefits if you lose your job while striking. |
Author: | LadyKate [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
darksiege wrote: 18k jobs lost because some stupid cocksuckers could not just take a small paycut... That happened to a local manufacturing plant where we live. The union had a hissy fit about pay cuts and other benefits and went on strike, then refused the compromise that was offered them...they stubbornly kept striking for over a year and then the company just decided to sell the location altogether and close it down. They spent a year not working and have no jobs at all now and over 2/3 of the former employees were all within striking distance of retirement age with nothing more than high school educations and that one job on their resume....they really screwed themselves over as they have zero job prospects now. No more twinkies, eh? |
Author: | Hopwin [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Horde your Twinkies |
Xequecal wrote: Hopwin wrote: DFK! wrote: Rorinthas wrote: Way to stay strong bakers union. Hope it was worth it. I bet that 8% cut that was on the table is looking pretty good compared to the 100% cut they're now going to receive. Why? Now they get 99 weeks of unemployment right? That'll carry them to the next congressional election. In the vast majority of states, you're not eligible for unemployment benefits if you lose your job while striking. You cannot while on strike. If your strike forces your employer out of business you are GTG in all but 6 states (Idaho, Michigan, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas and Virginia) http://www.ehow.com/info_8446270_union- ... efits.html |
Author: | Midgen [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
As much disdain as I have for most unions in their current form, I would love to blame them for this. Unfortunately, the Hostess company, which was already in bankruptcy is mostly to blame. Their product line was failing because, generally, people are trending towards healthier snacks, and they failed to adapt. I don't know what their post bankruptcy business plan was. Hopefully it was more substantial than just reducing pay and benefits. |
Author: | Xequecal [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Horde your Twinkies |
Hopwin wrote: You cannot while on strike. If your strike forces your employer out of business you are GTG in all but 6 states (Idaho, Michigan, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas and Virginia) http://www.ehow.com/info_8446270_union- ... efits.html Quote: If you are a member of a union but your class or grade of employee does not actively participate in the strike, you would remain eligible for unemployment benefits in most states if you subsequently lose your job. If you actively participate in the strike, you don't get unemployment if you subsequently lose your job. Those 6 states go even further and prevent you from collecting umemployment if your union strikes anywhere, for any reason, even if you aren't striking. But if you actually go on strike and then lose your job you can't collect unemployment. |
Author: | Rorinthas [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Horde your Twinkies |
Attachment: ImageUploadedByTapatalk1353105041.618217.jpg [ 20.79 KiB | Viewed 2625 times ] |
Author: | Mookhow [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
At least Frito Lay seems to be doing ok. |
Author: | Leshani [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hostess outlet just down the road from where we live, My wife and I stopped in this morning with and bought everything. had a truck pick it up distribute to as many shelters as we could find. Did save few boxes of Twinkies though. |
Author: | Rynar [ Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
**** em'. |
Author: | Aizle [ Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:23 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I'd be wildly curious to look at the books for them, and see how the distribution of cuts and wages were between all employess, including management. |
Author: | Hopwin [ Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: |
Aizle wrote: I'd be wildly curious to look at the books for them, and see how the distribution of cuts and wages were between all employess, including management. When you go out of you business both sides get paid 0%. Coming off your 2nd bankruptcy I'd bet ownership gets a nice hunk of 0% too. |
Author: | Sean [ Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:03 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Quote: BCTGM members are well aware that as the company was preparing to file for bankruptcy earlier this year, the then CEO of Hostess was awarded a 300 percent raise (from approximately $750,000 to $2,550,000) and at least nine other top executives of the company received massive pay raises. One such executive received a pay increase from $500,000 to $900,000 and another received one taking his salary from $375,000 to $656,256. Totally, 100% the fault of the Unions, yep. |
Author: | Aizle [ Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Hopwin wrote: Aizle wrote: I'd be wildly curious to look at the books for them, and see how the distribution of cuts and wages were between all employess, including management. When you go out of you business both sides get paid 0%. Coming off your 2nd bankruptcy I'd bet ownership gets a nice hunk of 0% too. Riiight. Money says that every senior executive there has a golden parachute. That said, what I was indicating was what cuts were made on the last proposal that the union refused. |
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |