The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:34 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Arizona counter sue's
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:02 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/02 ... forcement/

Quote:
The announcement is the latest swipe in the ongoing legal dispute between Arizona and the U.S. Department of Justice over the state's tough immigration law. After the Obama administration challenged that law, a judge last year blocked key portions of it from going into effect. While the case is on appeal, Brewer said the countersuit will be filed as part of the federal government's challenge.

"It's outrageous the United States Department of Justice sued the people of Arizona to stop Senate Bill 1070," Brewer said. "Our message for the federal government is very simple -- use federal resources to combat the cartels who are breaking the federal law."

Arizona plans to sue on five different counts, including a claim that the federal government has failed to enforce immigration laws enacted by Congress and a claim it has failed to reimburse the state for costs associated with jailing criminal immigrants.


It's like watching a tennis match, back and forth we go.

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Teeheehee! Arizona has really been a dark horse surprise coming up strong on Texas in the "delighting States' rights people" race lately.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
I don't think people should be jailed unless they're doing something violent or destructive against others, or stealing, so I agree with not reimbursing them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:32 pm 
Offline
Deuce Master

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 3099
Lex Luthor wrote:
I don't think people should be jailed unless they're doing something violent or destructive against others, or stealing, so I agree with not reimbursing them.

So because of your personal feelings, you'll overlook the rule of law. Good stuff.

_________________
The Dude abides.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:38 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Lex Luthor wrote:
I don't think people should be jailed unless they're doing something violent or destructive against others, or stealing, so I agree with not reimbursing them.


They're breaking the law, and that doesn't make it fair to all the good hard working people who do the paperwork and get it right. They're getting to be here for free when others have to work for it. Isn't that a form of stealing?

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:59 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Screeling wrote:
So because of your personal feelings, you'll overlook the rule of law. Good stuff.

All of Lex's political reasoning is based on how he feels about a topic.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Rorinthas wrote:
They're breaking the law, and that doesn't make it fair to all the good hard working people who do the paperwork and get it right. They're getting to be here for free when others have to work for it. Isn't that a form of stealing?


I'm one of the people who got in legally, and I have to say the legal process is a little scummy. You can wait on a list for 7-14 years, and then hope you win the lottery for a slot, or you can get an immigration lawyer and essentially spend $20,000 to bypass the list and buy your way in. The Mexicans cannot get in legally because they simply can't afford it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:16 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
My girlfriend was on the list for seven years before she turned 21, qualified as an adult and the government told her she had to reapply by herself. That cost a lawyer and $10k to fix. Such a shitty system we've got here, it's ridiculous. "Give me your tired, your poor," my ***.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Rorinthas wrote:
Lex Luthor wrote:
I don't think people should be jailed unless they're doing something violent or destructive against others, or stealing, so I agree with not reimbursing them.


They're breaking the law, and that doesn't make it fair to all the good hard working people who do the paperwork and get it right. They're getting to be here for free when others have to work for it. Isn't that a form of stealing?


I don't care, and that doesn't make it stealing. They shouldn't go to jail for walking over land without harming anything. It's barbaric.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Honestly, there are very good reasons the immigration system works the way it does.

The fact is, Americans are not going to do backbreaking labor farm jobs. Those jobs are not worth minimum wage, (remember 90 hours/week even on minimum wage is not exactly a pittance, even if there's no overtime) but even if they paid minimum wage I suspect Americans would still not do them.

I get this suspicion because in Germany (admittedly not the US, but still first world with first world attitudes) they actually tried this. Germany has no minimum wage, in case you didn't know, so the government decided they would try subsidizing the farm labor jobs for German citizens. The jobs were worth like 7 Euro per hour for 80 hours a week and guess what? The Germans by and large turned up their noses and they still had to bring in immigrant labor.

This is the first world. People don't want to do 90 hours a week of manual labor in the outdoors in the first world.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Soon machines will do 100% of this manual labor instead of 95% or whatever it is, and then this aspect of the debate will be moot.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 10:01 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Repeal our entitlement systems and open the borders.

Win win.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 10:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Oh, there are plenty of theoretical solutions that would work great, but frankly, if you try to vote me into a 90-hour/week manual labor job, I'm fairly certain I can find five friends with votes that will vote to tell you to go **** yourself.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:04 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Xequecal wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
They're breaking the law, and that doesn't make it fair to all the good hard working people who do the paperwork and get it right. They're getting to be here for free when others have to work for it. Isn't that a form of stealing?


I'm one of the people who got in legally, and I have to say the legal process is a little scummy. You can wait on a list for 7-14 years, and then hope you win the lottery for a slot, or you can get an immigration lawyer and essentially spend $20,000 to bypass the list and buy your way in. The Mexicans cannot get in legally because they simply can't afford it.


I can't afford a new car. The car companies mark them up way too much. We know how much value they loose once they are driven off the lot. Should I go steal one? No I'd go to jail and they'd take the car away.

That said I appreciate your effort and think the process needs reform.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:10 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Lenas wrote:
Screeling wrote:
So because of your personal feelings, you'll overlook the rule of law. Good stuff.

All of Lex's politicalreasoning is based on how he feels about a topic.

Fixed.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:16 am 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
So how does that make him any different from the rest of you?

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Quote:
"It's outrageous the United States Department of Justice sued the people of Arizona to stop Senate Bill 1070," Brewer said. "Our message for the federal government is very simple -- use federal resources to combat the cartels who are breaking the federal law."


I think my Irony-o-meter just pegged...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Where's the irony? They passed a law to let state resources perform the necessary tasks that the federal government was not committing the resources to perform.

The Federal government is trying to stop them from doing so, saying "that's none of your business, that's our job!" So Arizona is saying back, "If it's your job, **** do it so we don't have to."

Where's the irony?

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Essentially it's "We're pissed you sued us, so we're going to sue you!" Seems pretty clear and obvious to me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:41 am 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Aizle wrote:
Essentially it's "We're pissed you sued us, so we're going to sue you!" Seems pretty clear and obvious to me.


Really? It's all about hurt feelings and childishness, and not about the process by which the law works when you have major disagreements between the state and federal governments?

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:49 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Aizle wrote:
Essentially it's "We're pissed you sued us, so we're going to sue you!" Seems pretty clear and obvious to me.



Please tell me your kidding.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Rynar wrote:
Aizle wrote:
Essentially it's "We're pissed you sued us, so we're going to sue you!" Seems pretty clear and obvious to me.


Really? It's all about hurt feelings and childishness, and not about the process by which the law works when you have major disagreements between the state and federal governments?


Of course it's not all about hurt feelings. And obviously it's how the process works. What I'm amused by is that they are "outraged" that they were sued, when as you stated that's the process for working out major disagreements. Yet that outrage didn't prevent them from suing right back. Again, as is the process.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:06 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Aizle wrote:
Rynar wrote:
Aizle wrote:
Essentially it's "We're pissed you sued us, so we're going to sue you!" Seems pretty clear and obvious to me.


Really? It's all about hurt feelings and childishness, and not about the process by which the law works when you have major disagreements between the state and federal governments?


Of course it's not all about hurt feelings. And obviously it's how the process works. What I'm amused by is that they are "outraged" that they were sued, when as you stated that's the process for working out major disagreements. Yet that outrage didn't prevent them from suing right back. Again, as is the process.



IT'S NOT ABOUT THE SUING!

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:08 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Aizle wrote:
Of course it's not all about hurt feelings. And obviously it's how the process works. What I'm amused by is that they are "outraged" that they were sued, when as you stated that's the process for working out major disagreements. Yet that outrage didn't prevent them from suing right back. Again, as is the process.
Actually, it was rather outrageous that the Federal Government sued, and the Justice Department relocated the suit repeatedly until it got a sympathetic judge. It was more outrageous that the Federal Government used the arguments it did to get an injunction against the law as well.

There's no irony here. The Justice Department will relocate Arizona's suit until it gets a sympathetic judge, and the States and Citizens lose a First Amendment right. And after that is all said and done, you'll still defend the President directing that Justice Department.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:15 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
So Aizle since you do not appear to get it (or care)... We work for the same company. You run the maintenance department and part of that job is pest control.

You do maintenance, but there is a mouse infestation... My kitchen staff is constantly having mouse related trouble.

Since you will not get the job done, i take some of my departments budget and say "I will do it myself"

You get pissy and run to HR about my department stepping onto your job. And they tell me ro cease and desist.

But i still have the mouse problem, why is it ironic for me to go to HR and demand that you do your job to keep the mice out?

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 247 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group