Müs wrote:
19 innings is a good thing? Having to resort to a second baseman to pitch?
Ridiculous. That'd be like an NFL game going for 8 hours and putting the punter in as QB because your 3rd string passed the hell out an hour ago.
If its tied after 10... call it a tie and go the hell home. Its not like one game *really* matters in baseball
See, this is the difference between baseball and football. Baseball never gets boring, and in fact revels in the absurdity of a lengthy game like this. Talk to those guys in 20 years, this will be the one game they remember, most likely, except for maybe All-Star games and World Series, if they're lucky. To this day, I remember a NY Mets game in the summer of 1986 that was still going on when I got home after work at 11:30 - and it went on for another hour and half or something. (Best thing Tim McCarver ever said: At midnight, after a commercial break, "If you're just tuning in ... " (hesitates) " ... Call us up and tell us why!"
So, for the fans, it was like getting two games for the price of one. And, it points up the beauty of the generalist (baseball) vs. the specialist (football). In baseball, you can put your 2nd baseman in to pitch if you need to. In football, once you're out of quarterbacks, forget it. No one else has taken the time to figure out the 5000-page playbook that you need to be able to run a team.