The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 7:22 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:18 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
I still don't get it. Assuming Solyndra was doing very well, that would be 550million, for 1,100 jobs. WTF.



It is 1,100 secured votes. Its 1,100 faces for political ads showing that "something" as done. The cost doesn't matter because it isn't coming out of their personal bank accounts or their campaign accounts.

This is how politicians work. Every day in every way.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Solyndra
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
This guy says it's all about getting the stimulus money dispersed. They didnt care about efficient, they just wanted to get money out there.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... les?page=2

Quote:
But putting all that aside, Bilbray is astonished that no one appears to have second-guessed the decision to build a new facility in the first place, which he calls “absurd.” With the number of Bay-Area start-ups constantly in flux, and with businesses “fleeing the state” in search of more favorable economic conditions, there is no shortage of facilities available to be rented or retrofitted to accommodate even high-tech companies like Solyndra.

Bilbray suspects that costs weren’t taken into account in this case because, as far as the administration was concerned, cost wasn’t an issue. “Part of the reason it was chosen was as more stimulus,” he says. “Which means we don’t worry about the cost-effectiveness. Throwing money at the economic crisis is an answer in itself. The taxpayer should be really nervous about that.”

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
So, basically, what most of the board has been saying since before the Stimulus was passed...

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:04 pm 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
I'm past nervousness and into dull acceptance.

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Solyndra
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:39 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/from-scand ... ree-weeks/

Good read.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Solyndra
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Meh, I don't see there being much in the way of corruption on this deal; just poor judgment and excessive enthusiasm. After all, the government went in for $550 million, but private investors went in for roughly twice that, so it's kind of inconsistent to think the government's involvement could only be due to corruption rather than good-faith, but ultimately mistaken, business judgment. It's also worth remembering that this really isn't a ridiculous amount of money in context. DOE backs something like $40 billion in loans, most of it in coal, gas and nukes, and the numbers for other government-backed loan programs are even higher. Hell, I've personally worked on multiple deals with hundreds of millions of dollars in government guarantees and/or direct loans (some US, some non-US), and I'm a very, very small cog in a very, very big machine.

At the end of the day, I suspect this was just a classic example of investors and lenders (in this case, DOE) convincing themselves that if they just threw a bunch of upfront money at something innovative, it'd pay off down the road, combined with some added time pressure because of the stimulus and the political optics and cool factor of "green energy/jobs".

*ETA that I'm not saying there was definitely no impropriety involved; in fact, I'm sure there was. I just don't see much to suggest that whatever "unofficial channels" might have been involved were out of the ordinary or the driving force behind the deal.


Last edited by RangerDave on Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:15 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
What are your thoughts on the Gunwalker issue RD?

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Nitefox wrote:
What are your thoughts on the Gunwalker issue RD?

Not familiar with that one. Is that the thing where ATF was selling guns to Mexican drug cartels as part of some elaborate (and seemingly very incompetent) sting operation?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:21 am 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Yep.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Those private investors?

Quote:
Billionaire philanthropist and entrepreneur George Kaiser has come under scrutiny for his possible role in a complex investment scandal involving California solar company Solyndra, the White House and two of Kaiser’s investment firms.

It’s a complicated story, and one that’s still unfolding.

The short of it: In 2009, Solyndra received $527 million dollars in loan guarantees from the Federal Financing Bank/U.S. Treasury. So when the firm filed bankruptcy on Wednesday, citing an inability to compete with its Chinese rivals, the FBI responded by raiding the company. From Thomson-Reuters:

The search comes amid intensifying pressure on the Obama administration, which championed Solyndra as being at the forefront of solar technology when President Barack Obama visited the company’s Fremont, California, facility in 2010.

“We are executing search warrants at Solyndra regarding a joint FBI and Department of Energy Office of Inspector General investigation,” Julianne Sohn of the FBI said in an email.

Here’s where Kaiser enters the picture. From MuniLand:

Two of Solyndra’s largest investors are Argonaut Ventures I, L.L.C. and the GKFF Investment Company, LLC. Both firms are represented on the Solyndra board of directors by Steven R. Mitchell (see Solyndra S-1 page 119). Both are investment vehicles of the George Kaiser Family Foundation of Tulsa, Oklahoma.

According to the Daily Caller, Kaiser was present at the White House 16 of the 20 times Solyndra officials and investors visited.

The insinuation is that Kaiser, an Obama donor, may have had undue influence in convincing the Obama Administration to invest $500 million in an unproven upstart energy company.

To further complicate things: according to MuniLand, Solyndra’s financing documents were re-written in February of this year, re-prioritizing Kaiser’s Argonaut above the Department of Energy (as in, above the taxpayers) as the first in line to be repaid.

Kaiser, for his part, has denied any impropriety.


This is why the private investment angle is problematic.

http://thislandpress.com/roundups/george-kaiser-and-the-solyndra-investment-scandal/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:46 am 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Would there have been private investment if the government did not toss its hat in?

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Nitefox wrote:
Yep.

Ah. I'm afraid I don't know much about that whole thing beyond the "this obviously wasn't going to end well" perspective I mentioned. I'll poke around a bit later, but I'm guessing from the context of this thread that there's some suggestion of Obama Administration corruption/influence involved?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
This made frontpage on the Drudgereport... this could be big.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
This is why the private investment angle is problematic.

Yeah, I read about that. I don't know if I'm a naif or a cynic, but I generally figure there's some baseline amount of extra access and influence that big money donors and/or business interests get, but that it rarely rises to the level of "Here's a big envelope of cash, Senator. Now, about those contracts...." For example, I have no doubt that Cheney's connections with Halliburton had an impact on Halliburton's level of access and thus its success in obtaining contractor work in Iraq; and I don't doubt that Paulson's Wall Street background influenced his decisions about how to handle the big banks with the TARP bailout. Likewise, I wouldn't be at all surprised if Solyndra had a better shot at securing government backing because Kaiser was able to bend the President's ear about this great new solar project he was working on.

I guess I just don't think of that sort of thing as "corruption", per se, as long as the ultimate decision that gets made is reasonable on its own merits. Even without their extra connections, Halliburton would have been on every shortlist for Iraq construction projects; Goldman Sachs would have received TARP funds; and Solyndra would have been in the running for DOE support. So, absent some pretty compelling evidence of true quid pro quo, I tend not to get too worked up about those sorts of defensible decisions.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Hannibal wrote:
Would there have been private investment if the government did not toss its hat in?

Hard to say. There's been some talk that government loans/guarantees can crowd out private lenders in some circumstances because the government has first priority in bankruptcy, so if the government wasn't there, maybe more private lenders would have come in, and we'd have ended up with similar levels of private equity investors as well. Alternatively, I've seen some reports that private lenders were staying away because they were wary of Solyndra's business projections, in which case, absent the government, there would have been no debt funding and the private investors probably would have stayed away.

Conceptually, though, the whole idea of government loans/guarantees is to fund things private lenders/investors are reluctant to get into and, ultimately, to draw that private debt/equity funding into the deal.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
This is why the private investment angle is problematic.

Yeah, I read about that. I don't know if I'm a naif or a cynic, but I generally figure there's some baseline amount of extra access and influence that big money donors and/or business interests get, but that it rarely rises to the level of "Here's a big envelope of cash, Senator. Now, about those contracts...." For example, I have no doubt that Cheney's connections with Halliburton had an impact on Halliburton's level of access and thus its success in obtaining contractor work in Iraq; and I don't doubt that Paulson's Wall Street background influenced his decisions about how to handle the big banks with the TARP bailout. Likewise, I wouldn't be at all surprised if Solyndra had a better shot at securing government backing because Kaiser was able to bend the President's ear about this great new solar project he was working on.

I guess I just don't think of that sort of thing as "corruption", per se, as long as the ultimate decision that gets made is reasonable on its own merits. Even without their extra connections, Halliburton would have been on every shortlist for Iraq construction projects; Goldman Sachs would have received TARP funds; and Solyndra would have been in the running for DOE support. So, absent some pretty compelling evidence of true quid pro quo, I tend not to get too worked up about those sorts of defensible decisions.


This is a reasonable position, overall. However, there was that Bush-era tabling of the loan. It wasn't until Obama got into office that it was resurrected and pushed through. This calls into question the "as long as the ultimate decision that gets made is reasonable on its own merits" basis for your argument. DOE under Bush did not think it was a wise investment, and they were correct.

I'm not saying it's corrupt either, but it looks very bad, and an investigation by the FBI seems warranted. Congress should also do so.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
RangerDave wrote:
Conceptually, though, the whole idea of government loans/guarantees is to fund things private lenders/investors are reluctant to get into and, ultimately, to draw that private debt/equity funding into the deal.

In this case, though, the private lending charge was lead by an individual who was pretty deep in bed, it seems, with both the administration and Solyndra, and who, less than a year after the gov't loan was made, got his investment prioritized over the gov't.

Sounds like he was arranging for the gov't to buy capital that could be sold off in bankruptcy for him to recoup his losses if Solyndra didn't pan out, to me.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
In this case, though, the private lending charge was lead by an individual who was pretty deep in bed, it seems, with both the administration and Solyndra, and who, less than a year after the gov't loan was made, got his investment prioritized over the gov't.

Yeah, a couple partners at my firm were speculating about that the other day. They were pretty surprised DOE agreed to it, and more to the point, that DOE's outside counsel (MoFo) let them agree to it. The upshot of their speculation was that DOE was probably trying to induce additional private debt to come in (and thereby keep the company afloat) by letting the new debt take priority, but that it was a really stupid move at that point in the deal, given how likely bankruptcy was starting to look. Whether they did that because of wishful thinking or political pressure remains to be seen, of course.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
DOE's outside counsel (MoFo)


Wait... what?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Heh. Yep, Morrison Foerester. Such an unfortunate nickname. They've embraced it, though - here's their actual web address: http://www.mofo.com/ :thumbs:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:18 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
RangerDave wrote:
Hannibal wrote:
Would there have been private investment if the government did not toss its hat in?

Hard to say. There's been some talk that government loans/guarantees can crowd out private lenders in some circumstances because the government has first priority in bankruptcy, so if the government wasn't there, maybe more private lenders would have come in, and we'd have ended up with similar levels of private equity investors as well. Alternatively, I've seen some reports that private lenders were staying away because they were wary of Solyndra's business projections, in which case, absent the government, there would have been no debt funding and the private investors probably would have stayed away.

Conceptually, though, the whole idea of government loans/guarantees is to fund things private lenders/investors are reluctant to get into and, ultimately, to draw that private debt/equity funding into the deal.


Amazing as it may seem to a lot of people, Cheney probably had almost nothing to do with Haliburton's receipt of most contracts. A great many of the no-bid contracts were that way because they involved specialized requirements that only Haliburton had maintained the ability to meet.

It's much like contracts for nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. Newport News Shipbuilding (Now owned by Northrop Grumman) is the only company that can build these, and thus there is no point in competition; there will never be enough orders for such ships to allow for it. They have build every nuclear-powered carrier, and in fact every full sized carrier since Enterprise.

I believe much of the same applies to KBR for a great deal of other more mundane contractor work in Iraq. When the needs these companies and their contracts service arise, they are needed now, and it simply is not practicable for more than one company to maintain these capabilities. In the case of KBR, however, they already had a standing contract to provide support.

They also really do serve some decent chow.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Last edited by Diamondeye on Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:53 am 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Looks like the Solyndra execs won't testify before Congress:
Reuters
Quote:
Sept 20 (Reuters) - Solyndra LLC's chief executive and chief financial officer will invoke their Fifth Amendment rights and decline to answer any questions put to them at a Congressional hearing on Friday, according to letters from their attorneys obtained by Reuters.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Solyndra
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Makes sense. This thing has political grandstanding written all over it. Senators and Representatives using their subpoena power and "contempt of Congress" clubs to drag people before Congress and use them as props for the latest dog-and-pony show has always been a pet peeve of mine. You think there was a crime? Fine, let the Justice Department file charges. You want to shine a light on something you think is shameful but not illegal? Fine, get up on your soapbox. Just don't mix the two and use quasi-judicial powers to compel private citizens to come listen to you harangue them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:08 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Umm, what public act of Congress doesn't have "political grandstanding written all over it"?

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:13 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Their testimony won't be needed. Apparently there is no shortage of maltreated former employees who are lining up to whistleblow and offer testimony.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group