The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 11:36 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:43 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Again I would like to say this: Not my **** concern to pay extra taxes to cover for some other ****'s health costs.

I work, I bust my *** to keep a job with decent health benefits... you cannot be bothered to work a decent job, or get a compensation package that accomidates all of your needs.. not my gorram problem. Stop making it my problem.

Just like you should not have to pay extra taxes to keep my unhealthy *** alive.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 889
Brit Hume made an excellent point on (I think it was) Fox news. Crunching numbers, he was guesstimating that the premium will be a couple of grand, while the fine is only 250.00 at this point. So many (most) young Americans will choose to pay the 250 per year, rather than several thousand. And, since the bill prohibits excluding pre-existing conditions, if they get sick, a phone call gets them the insurance coverage they need right then. It looks like a huge problem.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:57 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
$250.00 fine was only for businesses and was from the previous iteration. The personal fine involves Jail Time in the House approved version of the bill.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 889
Khross wrote:
$250.00 fine was only for businesses and was from the previous iteration. The personal fine involves Jail Time in the House approved version of the bill.

He said the Senate version only has a fine of 250.00


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:08 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Beryllin wrote:
Khross wrote:
$250.00 fine was only for businesses and was from the previous iteration. The personal fine involves Jail Time in the House approved version of the bill.

He said the Senate version only has a fine of 250.00


There are several Senate versions, none of which have passed.

The House bill has, and should thus probably be considered the definitive bill at this point.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:15 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
DFK! wrote:
Monte wrote:
That argument still fails. We spend more than you per capita. Much more. And we get worse results. If we went to a public plan, we would very quickly drive our costs down, per capita, and overall.


Demonstrate that a public option would decrease costs.


Can't be done, as under the current iteration of the House Bill - costs will go up. Democrats have promised that health reform would reduce health care costs, but legislation the House passed last week would increase costs over the next decade by $289 billion. By 2019, health costs would rise to 21.1 percent of GDP compared to 20.8 under current law, according to an actuarial report prepared by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:05 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Vindicarre wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Monte wrote:
That argument still fails. We spend more than you per capita. Much more. And we get worse results. If we went to a public plan, we would very quickly drive our costs down, per capita, and overall.


Demonstrate that a public option would decrease costs.


Can't be done, as under the current iteration of the House Bill - costs will go up. Democrats have promised that health reform would reduce health care costs, but legislation the House passed last week would increase costs over the next decade by $289 billion. By 2019, health costs would rise to 21.1 percent of GDP compared to 20.8 under current law, according to an actuarial report prepared by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.


Using hedonic regression (the Monetarist's favorite tool), since more people will be receiving care, and the gross increase in health care expenditures is not increasing proportionately, and this happens nearly "instantaneously" to where the quality of care bought with each dollar doesn't change (i.e. the change in expenditures and recipients is much faster than the health care technology improves so it is nearly a differential time element), we must therefore conclude the quality of care per dollar spent will decrease. So not only is the amount being spent in the aggregate increasing, but healthcare is becoming more expensive, dollar for dollar.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Khross wrote:
$250.00 fine was only for businesses and was from the previous iteration. The personal fine involves Jail Time in the House approved version of the bill.


Didn't someone already debunk that? I was pretty sure Xeq showed that the jail time was for not paying taxes in another thread.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:36 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Under H.R. 3962, anyone who does not carry healthcare is subject to an additional tax; if they don't pay the tax, they are subject to penalties up to and including felony evasion - $250,000 and five years in jail.

Joint Committee on Taxation

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:43 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Vindicarre wrote:
Under H.R. 3962, anyone who does not carry healthcare is subject to an additional tax; if they don't pay the tax, they are subject to penalties up to and including felony evasion - $250,000 and five years in jail.

Joint Committee on Taxation


Hey, you know what'd be great? If they made it a strict liability issue with no retroactive payment allowed. Then we'd truly be helping the uninsured.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:22 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Thanks, Vindicarre.

Fun times are ahead. Curiously enough, I will be considered uninsured under this new bill.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:59 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
No problem Khross. It's amazing what you can find on the interwebs. It's a sad commentary that relying on inter-committee correspondence seems to be more advantageous than reading the actual bills.

Why would you be considered uninsured under this bill?

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:04 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Vindicarre wrote:
Why would you be considered uninsured under this bill?


He's self-insured.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:08 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Vindicarre:

Because high deductible, catastrophic event insurance doesn't count.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:12 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Ahhh. Of course it doesn't Khross, it involves financial responsibility and makes use of logical steps to limit the control others can exert over you. Clearly, the government cannot let that stand.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:40 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Khross wrote:
Vindicarre:

Because high deductible, catastrophic event insurance doesn't count.

You won't count as uninsured then, (I thought you self-insured) instead it just won't be legal for you to buy a plan like that.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
So, it's a tax, and tax evasion is a crime. Again, what's the problem? (other than being annoyed about the tax).

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:58 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Monte wrote:
So, it's a tax, and tax evasion is a crime. Again, what's the problem? (other than being annoyed about the tax).



1. It is illegal.
2. It is an infringement on the rights of others.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:01 am 
Offline
Deuce Master

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 3099
Monte wrote:
So, it's a tax, and tax evasion is a crime. Again, what's the problem? (other than being annoyed about the tax).

It's a tax mandating we have to purchase a service. That's the problem.

_________________
The Dude abides.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
No, it's a tax that applies if you *don't* purchase a service, and if you avoid paying the tax, you are guilty of tax evasion.

I'm not saying it's not obnoxious, or even under handed. It is, however, not what it's being described as.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:12 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
It is not a tax.

It is a fine.

A tax punishes legal behavior.
A fine punishes illegal behavior.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
It's a fine for not paying a tax, Elmo.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:00 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Monte wrote:
It's a fine for not paying a tax, Elmo.


How do you avoid the tax?

All other Federal taxes in this country are at least remotely, though perhaps unrealistically, avoidable.

You're championing a tax to exist.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Like most other federal taxes, you avoid it by being poor enough to not have to pay it. In this case, you use medicaid.

I am not championing a "tax to exist", although I bet you could make a mint selling that particular frame to the RNC as a talking point. Much like "death tax" is an appeal to emotion, so is that phrase.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:04 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Elmarnieh wrote:
1. It is illegal.
2. It is an infringement on the rights of others.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 293 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group