The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:56 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Salem, MA
...on a driver larger than 32GB

does anyone know how to do it? I tried the dos method but after an hour of supposedly formatting and getting to 100% it told me the volume was too big for FAT32 :/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:32 am 
Offline
God of the IRC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 3041
Location: The United States of DESU
The 32 gigabyte limit seems to be an arbitrary restriction placed on Microsoft's disk utilities, to encourage you to use NTFS insead. The workarounds I've seen have been 1) use a Win98 or WinME boot disk, which doesn't have the arbitrary restriction, or 2) use a third party disk utility. This forum post recommends a utility called fat32format: http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content ... 06/#564584

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Why not use NTFS?

Wikipedia wrote:
For most purposes, the NTFS file system is superior to FAT in terms of features and reliability; its main drawbacks are the size overhead for small volumes and the very limited support by anything other than the NT-based versions of Windows, since the exact specification is a trade secret of Microsoft. The availability of NTFS-3G since mid 2006 has led to much improved NTFS support in Unix-like operating systems, considerably alleviating this concern.




edit: What Mookhow said


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Salem, MA
Mookhow wrote:
The 32 gigabyte limit seems to be an arbitrary restriction placed on Microsoft's disk utilities, to encourage you to use NTFS insead. The workarounds I've seen have been 1) use a Win98 or WinME boot disk, which doesn't have the arbitrary restriction, or 2) use a third party disk utility. This forum post recommends a utility called fat32format: http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content ... 06/#564584


Thanks, that works perfectly :)

Lex Luthor wrote:
Why not use NTFS?


Because many devices that implement External USB storage don't support NTFS, only FAT16/32, including the device I need to use the drive on.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
I had problems with large drives formatting for FAT32 after attaching them to Win7. Somehow, they were converted to what my Mac thought was ntfs. I'm not sure what happened, and it was a long time after whatever happened that I found I had a problem, so I couldn't do much investigation.

Just FYI

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Salem, MA
Taskiss wrote:
I had problems with large drives formatting for FAT32 after attaching them to Win7. Somehow, they were converted to what my Mac thought was ntfs. I'm not sure what happened, and it was a long time after whatever happened that I found I had a problem, so I couldn't do much investigation.

Just FYI


Weird. Well so far no problem for me, I formatted the drive to FAT32 on a Windows 7 machine and then transferred all my MP3's onto the drive and plugged it into the USB port on my car stereo and it worked fine this time, so hopefully I won't get that issue, though using the drive is only temporary anyways until I get my tablet mounted in the car.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:58 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
You need 32gb of music in your car as a temporary solution? Sheesh. I'm happy with a few podcasts and maybe 5 hours worth of music.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Salem, MA
Lenas wrote:
You need 32gb of music in your car as a temporary solution? Sheesh. I'm happy with a few podcasts and maybe 5 hours worth of music.


No, only 22.4gb of music :p

The drive size Which is a 64gb SSD is only because that's the drive that was in my windows computer that used to control all my music, so atm that's what I have available to store the music on, and since it can hold my entire library there's no reason to not have it all on the drive, then I can listen to whatever I want from my collection whenever I want ;) Just annoyingly I wasn't able to simply plug the drive in as is and use it because it was formatted as NTFS and additionally may have be an issue because it was a system drive since that was the drive windows XP was install on on that computer.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:47 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastardâ„¢
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
What a waste of an SSD.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Salem, MA
Khross wrote:
What a waste of an SSD.


Well an SSD is somewhat of a necessity due to the environment, the computer originally has a standard HDD, however the fluid bearings would freeze in single digit temps and the constant vibration and shock on the drive would eventually cause drive corruption and require a re-install every 1-2 year, the only other option at the time was a military grade HDD which was more expensive than the SSD.

Plus we're not talking a modern 500+mb/s read/write speed drive, it's like 2-3 years old and is marginally faster than a modern traditional HDD at best, I think it's rated for 160mb/s sequential read, still once the tablet is install I'll likely be using it to replace the OS drive in my desktop which is an old 74gb WD raptor drive which only has sequential read speeds around 65mb/s.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:25 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastardâ„¢
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Still wasting an SSD.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:35 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Salem, MA
Lenas wrote:
Image


Except that cost money, the SSD I already had sitting around currently unused :p


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:45 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
But it's... like... $35! That SSD was probably like $200 when you got it :P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 614
Location: Salem, MA
Lenas wrote:
But it's... like... $35! That SSD was probably like $200 when you got it :P


Actually it was only like $150 :p

But still, that's $35 more than what I have to spend using that SSD for something I only need for a couple weeks and would then have zero use for, and fortunately using the SSD I have was very viable as it has both SATA and USB built into the drive itself. And who knows what the real usable lifespan is left on the SSD anyways since it is an older one with less writes before failure and it was the OS drive on an XP build which isn't SSD friendly in itself. Also like most old SSD's it's prone to micro stutters, I actually had to create a batch file for running the music playing software I use to run the program at above normal priority because without that when I was also running GPS nav the music would occasionally stutter which didn't happen with the old 5400rpm 2.5" drive that was in the computer prior to the SSD.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 169 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group