Corolinth wrote:
Those automobiles are primarily for short range usage. We have several of them on campus. They probably don't travel much more than twenty miles per day, and they recharge at night. That much stop and go is hell on a combustion engine's efficiency. An electric motor doesn't really care.
Yes, that's what an electric vehicle is good for. That's why golf carts have mainly been electric for a long time.
Despite that, the new communo-green movement pushes electric cars. Now, the debate about
why they want that is probably more suited for hellfire or heckfire, but I'm pretty sure we can agree that electric cars in the current vernacular are being pushed by the greenies.
Now, the current generation of electric cars do NOT meet the average American driver's needs. They
potentially meet a European driver's needs, if that driver is willing to make some sacrifices. The foreseeable improvements in battery output and longevity do not appear to overcome the current limitations.
Therefore, people like me (and apparently Arafys, though I don't want to speak for him) are much more in the hydrogen fuel cell camp.
To be clear, using the current industry terms, a hydrogen fuel cell in a car powers an electric motor. Any other motor would be rather silly, as then it wouldn't really be running on the fuel cell. Therefore, adding the distinction that a hydrogen fuel cell car is technically an electric hybrid is moot, as the former inherently implies the latter. Whereas, the phrase "electric car" in auto industry vernacular, indicates a plug-in, such as the Leaf, Volt, or G-Wiz. This phrase is morphing in the last couple of years to include hybrids as well, however, and may one day soon change meanings.