Elmarnieh wrote:
No, thats not my position and you know it isn't.
The bill originated in the Senate (see those words which don't end in "the House") was sent to the house then back to the Senate. That is not the same as "The bill originated in the House" which is what is mandated by law.
It's not a strawman when the Constitution lists a process and you encourage elected officials to break that oath of office. It is literally what you're doing.
IT DOES NOT MATTER what happens in the Senate. The Senate can do whatever it wants. If the House agrees to take up the bill, and then it goes back to the Senate, they aren't breaking the rules. The process isn't violated. The bill goes through the House, then through the Senate. That's the process, and is being followed.
House Reps have the right to introduce the bill they want. It doesn't matter if the language came from the Senate, their staffers, or their wife's crazy uncle Bob. As long as it goes through the House, then the Senate, it does not violate procedure.