The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 12:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 1:33 am 
Offline
Solo Hero
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:32 pm
Posts: 3874
Location: Clarkston, Mi
Just got back, I liked it. It was dirty though. Even Empire felt clean next to this one. It is the first time the Star Wars U felt grubby to me. As for the story...I was honestly expecting something closer to Ocean's Eleven, not the Dirty Dozen.

Tarkin had one flaw that I could see. He looked far too sinister. Also, that face would not have with stood the full power of a well lit room.

_________________
Raell Kromwell


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 1:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
I thought the CGI was fine. If I hadn't read this thread, I might not have given it a second thought (at least in Tarkin's place, I didn't even know he was dead).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:40 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Midgen wrote:
I thought the CGI was fine. If I hadn't read this thread, I might not have given it a second thought (at least in Tarkin's place, I didn't even know he was dead).



He was an old man 39 years ago when Star Wars came out. You wouldn't have needed to know he was dead to know there was some magic afoot.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
Talya wrote:
Midgen wrote:
I thought the CGI was fine. If I hadn't read this thread, I might not have given it a second thought (at least in Tarkin's place, I didn't even know he was dead).



He was an old man 39 years ago when Star Wars came out. You wouldn't have needed to know he was dead to know there was some magic afoot.


It's just not something I would have given any thought too.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 25, 2016 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:40 am
Posts: 3188
Midgen wrote:
It's just not something I would have given any thought too.


I knew they got an actress who looked similar to Mon Mothma, I assumed they did the same for Tarkin. I thought maaaaybe he was touched up a little with CG, sort of like JGL in Looper. But that was it. Having no knowledge of the ful CG-ness beforehand didn't make it stand out to me.

_________________
Les Zombis et les Loups-Garous!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 3:31 pm 
Offline
Mountain Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 3374
I wish they'd get away from the idea of having to have a specific actor to play a specific role. There are thousands of actors in the world, and I'm sure they could have dug up one who looked roughly similar and could put his own take on the role.

Heck, Everyone's gonna look different anyway when they remake Ep. IV in ten years.

_________________
This cold and dark tormented hell
Is all I`ll ever know
So when you get to heaven
May the devil be the judge


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:49 pm
Posts: 3455
Location: St. Louis, MO
They did get away from it, that's the point. Now you just need somebody who is roughly the appropriate dimensions. All they really need to do is get James Earl Jones in to recite the dictionary for a couple of weeks, and they can make any story they want involving Darth Vader forever, as long as they don't lose the audio files. And I suspect that the Disney Sound Archives look very similar to the Imperial Archives.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2016 12:40 am 
Offline
Eatin yur toes.
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:49 am
Posts: 836
Diamondeye wrote:
Well, I guess we can all rest assured that an AT-AT can, indeed, shrug off a shoulder-fired missile.

Other than that, it was **** awesome.


Respectfully.

It was just **** awesome.

Love you [emoji16]


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2016 7:57 am 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
https://net.vocaloid.com/en/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:40 am
Posts: 4281
Finally saw it, it's the first movie that gives me the Star Wars glow since the OT. Force unleashed did well, but I had major issues with the story (and the un-finishedness of it, also known as the "JJAffect". So much of it seemed to be designed to set up VIII and IX that it did not feel like a complete film.)

This one did not have that problem. With it being Disney, I had serious doubts they were going to kill off the entire main cast, which I believe actually made it more impactful when it happened. The choice to not have a crawl, to not start with STAR WARS zooming away from the camera were definitely a calculated play to make this film stand alone, while fitting brilliantly as a lead-in to the OT. The grittier camerawork, the choice to pan from one battle to the other (as one ship crashes, simply panning to the ground battle instead of hard cutting between them like Jedi) made it feel much more connected and intense. Definitely my favorite Star Wars film since Jedi, and the aesthetic was perfectly executed, it felt unmistakably Star Wars, while still unique.

As a final note, Vader is finally a badass again! While his beatdown on Krennic was cheesy (but fun to see the evil Vader back in form), his Vorhees-esque moment at the end of the movie stole the show for me. Nice to see the character restored to his former terrifying glory after all this time.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Diamondeye wrote:
Well, I guess we can all rest assured that an AT-AT can, indeed, shrug off a shoulder-fired missile.


You know, AT-ATs are so ridiculous as a combat weapon (especially as wide-spread as hover-technology is) that they AT LEAST need to be able to take a missile.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:40 am
Posts: 4281
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Well, I guess we can all rest assured that an AT-AT can, indeed, shrug off a shoulder-fired missile.


You know, AT-ATs are so ridiculous as a combat weapon (especially as wide-spread as hover-technology is) that they AT LEAST need to be able to take a missile.


Right? "Hey guys, lets design a tank, but with WAY more instability and additional points of failure. Don't worry, it's going to look kind of like a camel! Worth it!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 5:09 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Darkroland wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Well, I guess we can all rest assured that an AT-AT can, indeed, shrug off a shoulder-fired missile.


You know, AT-ATs are so ridiculous as a combat weapon (especially as wide-spread as hover-technology is) that they AT LEAST need to be able to take a missile.


Right? "Hey guys, lets design a tank, but with WAY more instability and additional points of failure. Don't worry, it's going to look kind of like a camel! Worth it!"



If for some reason you need a walker design, they should have simply made a bigger, more heavily armored version of the AT-TE from the Clone Wars. It was inherently far more stable.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:11 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
After all of George Lucas' hard work to neuter Darth Vader, it was uplifting to see that he couldn't appear on camera without making someone **** themselves.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:41 pm
Posts: 1012
Caleria wrote:
But they were both so well done, that neither my wife, nor my kids noticed that they were CGI. That says a lot.


Tarkin was distracting to me simply because of the CGI. It didn't look real to me at all.

BTW, Saw Gerrera was in The Clone Wars, some of the novels, and Rebels, and one of the astromech droids from Rebels (C1-10P "Chopper") was at the base on Yavin 4. I haven't seen those, so I guess I'll need to go back and watch everything.

_________________
When he's underwater does he get wet? Or does the water get him instead?


Last edited by Serienya on Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:41 pm
Posts: 1012
Speaking of which...


_________________
When he's underwater does he get wet? Or does the water get him instead?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Corolinth wrote:
After all of George Lucas' hard work to neuter Darth Vader, it was uplifting to see that he couldn't appear on camera without making someone **** themselves.


In the audience or on screen.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:23 pm 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
It was meh. Lots of member berries. And apparently Jin (the only characters name i can remember) was such a terrible child, her mother would rather be shot by storm troopers than make sure she was raised by at least one of her parents.

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 2:45 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Darkroland wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Well, I guess we can all rest assured that an AT-AT can, indeed, shrug off a shoulder-fired missile.


You know, AT-ATs are so ridiculous as a combat weapon (especially as wide-spread as hover-technology is) that they AT LEAST need to be able to take a missile.


Right? "Hey guys, lets design a tank, but with WAY more instability and additional points of failure. Don't worry, it's going to look kind of like a camel! Worth it!"


Not to mention a total inability to protect its own sides and rear. Really, who needs that?

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 1:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:40 am
Posts: 3188
Star Wars is Fantasy, not Sci-Fi. Logic applies far less to fantasy.

_________________
Les Zombis et les Loups-Garous!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 9:04 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
So, I just rewatched this.

It's better every time. So much detail.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:44 am 
Offline
Deuce Master

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 3099
I stayed out of this thread because I hadn't seen it until recently. I think I knew they did CGI for Leia, but that was it. I instantly knew Tarkin was CGI though. I think some of you just had too much blood draining into your crotch to be lucid enough for it. :)

I thought the movie was okay, but as a couple people mentioned, I just didn't really care much about too many of the characters. Also, without the Force being more prominent (the Asian wannabe dude just didn't cut it for me), it felt less Star Wars-y to me. I understand why it had to be that way given the timeline, but it still impacted my enjoyment of it as a Star Wars movie.

_________________
The Dude abides.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 161 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group