NephyrS wrote:
DE:
Perhaps we have different definitions of injustice. From MW, injustice implies an unfairness against the party with a grievance. I think we can certainly agree that it is unfair that one group should be made to feel uncomfortable with their bathroom/locker room facilities just so a second group can feel comfortable.
The magnitude is debatable, as Ladas points out- obviously, on one hand you have something that makes a lot of people uncomfortable, and on the other hand, you have something that makes only a few people uncomfortable... But pleasing one group at the cost of another group does pretty distinctly constitute an injustice.
I don't see how it does. Failing to please someone or make them comfortable isn't an injustice at all. An injustice is when you intentionally go out of your way to harm them, make them more uncomfortable than necessary, humiliate them, etc, not when those things happen as a result of equal treatment in the first place. We should try to please and make comfortable as many people as we reasonably can, but we can't please everyone.
Quote:
Moving past the injustice angle, why not just let the admittedly few people with a legitimate intersexual or transsexual condition be allowed to use the facilities they feel more comfortable in?
Because it will make far more people uncomfortable. If these people want to use the facilities they prefer, they should wait until such time as they get medical correction to make that appropriate for them. If it's not serious enough to require that, or they feel that option isn't appropriate for them, they should deal with the hand they're dealt.
Quote:
It shouldn't be many, and they are not disrupting the use of the facilities for anyone else- it might make a few people uncomfortable, but it isn't like you're making the bathrooms completely unisex.
It's far more than "a few", the vast majority of people are very uncomfortable at the idea of having to share such facilities with the opposite sex. If that discomfort were not the prevailing feeling, we'd already have integrated facilities. I don't, in any case see the "few" uncomfortable people being any "fewer" than this vague group of people with gender issues, and so I don't see any reason to spend any special effort on their feelings.