The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:53 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 11:27 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Austrians seek right to partnership created for gays

A heterosexual Austrian couple have embarked on a court battle to have their relationship legally recognised as a "registered partnership" - a new form of civil union for same-sex couples.

Half-married: Frederic Morel and Delphine Rorive in half a wedding outfit
Helga Ratzenboeck and Martin Seydl say they don't want a traditional marriage and insist that the law should be blind to gender and sexuality.
Meanwhile, the kind of pared-down marriage they want is proving a huge hit with straight couples in France, where 95% of couples taking up the pacte civil de solidarite (Pacs) in 2009 were heterosexual.
As the number of straight French couples opting for Pacs has grown, the number of marriages has shrunk, to the point that there are now two couples entering into a Pacs for every three getting married.
'A little bit equal'
In both Austria and France, some gay couples are fighting for the right to full marriage. Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Norway are currently the only European countries allowing same-sex marriages.

Should we want to get divorced it would be easier, which is good, because marriage is heavily criticised for being too strict
Joerg Epper Kaiser
But legal battles for the right to registered partnership, like Ms Ratzenboeck and Mr Seydl's, are rarer.
"The couple involved already have grown up children and are not interested in adopting," says their lawyer, Helmut Graupner.
"They are more interested in a more loose, modern form of partnership with a shorter time period for divorce and lower maintenance obligations afterwards."
Mr Graupner is also representing two Austrian same-sex couples, one gay and other lesbian, wanting a traditional marriage.
He has an argument that applies to both sets of clients: "You can't be a little bit equal, in the same way as you can't be a little bit dead or a little bit pregnant. You can only be equal or unequal."
The Constitutional Court turned down the idea of marriage for gay couples in 2003, on the grounds that the purpose of marriage was reproduction.
But Mr Graupner, who points out that infertile people are allowed to marry, thinks there is now a chance the court will change its mind.
"There are some younger judges and younger judges are normally more open on this question," he says.
Sexual fidelity
Austria is the eighth EU country to have introduced partnerships for same-sex couples. They are very similar, but not the same as marriage. The others are Britain, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary and Slovenia.

REGISTERED PARTNERSHIPS
Introduced in Austria on 1 January 2010
270 partnerships concluded by end of April
185 (69%) involving men, 85 (31%) involving women
Source: Interior Ministry
Austria's "registered partnerships" do not bring adoption rights or access to fertility treatment, but despite more than 70 differences, gay and lesbian groups tended to see their introduction on 1 January as significant progress for a conservative, Catholic country.
Some, like Kurt Krickler of Viennese gay rights group HOSI, were pleasantly surprised at how far the partnerships went. Particularly surprising, he says, is that that it offers non-Austrian partners a right to work in Austria, where fears about immigration run very high.
Supporters cite a number of reasons why registered partnerships are better than marriages. Dissolving a marriage can take up to six years, while for registered partnerships it takes three at most. The law also puts more emphasis on openness and honesty than on strict sexual fidelity.

We just wanted to pay less taxes
Delphine Rorive
"Should we want to get divorced it would be easier, which is good, because marriage is heavily criticised for being too strict," says Joerg Eipper Kaiser, a 34-year-old museum worker in Austria's second city of Graz. Joerg, who was one of the first people to enter into a registered partnership, says his only complaint is that he is not allowed, under the law, to hyphenate his last two names.
Fancy dress
France's Pacs has some similarities. There are tax advantages and, for many straight couples, it seems like a low-risk stepping stone to marriage.
Delphine Rorive a 31-year-old management consultant "Pacsed" her boyfriend Frederic Morel, 29, in July last year.
"We just wanted to pay less taxes," she says.
"To us, it was only an administrative process. We had an appointment at the court at 0800 one morning, just the two of us, and 15 minutes later we were outside, Pacsed and ready to go to work, which we did.
"Soon after we decided to organise a fancy-dress party to celebrate. We invited all of our friends but no family, otherwise it would have been too much like a wedding.
"My boyfriend and I dressed as 'half-married' people, with our top halves in wedding outfits and the bottom half casual," says Ms Rorive.
And what of the future? "To me, it doesn't replace marriage. I'd still like to get married one day."

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
I hope they win.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Müs wrote:
Austrians seek right to partnership created for gays]The Constitutional Court turned down the idea of marriage for gay couples in 2003, on the grounds that the purpose of marriage was reproduction.
But Mr Graupner, who points out that infertile people are allowed to marry, thinks there is now a chance the court will change its mind.
We just wanted to pay less taxes
Delphine Rorive
France's Pacs has some similarities. There are tax advantages and, for many straight couples, it seems like a low-risk stepping stone to marriage.
Delphine Rorive a 31-year-old management consultant "Pacsed" her boyfriend Frederic Morel, 29, in July last year.
"We just wanted to pay less taxes," she says.

If this gets overturned, I hope their country starts looking at abolishing the tax benefits for both. The primary reason for the benefits was to promote reproductive families. If the decision gets overturned (especially based on the "marriage isn't about reproduction" thing the lawyer seems to be pursuing), then it's time to pursue that vestigial relic in the tax code. And then, I hope the US follows suit.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 6:37 pm 
Offline
Asian Blonde

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 2075
alternatively they could just let everyone get married as they wish under the same rule...

KISS


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 8:37 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Keeping it simple would be the federal and maybe even state governments not caring about who is and isn't married and treating all individuals the same in the eyes of getting from and being taxed by the government.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Rorinthas wrote:
Keeping it simple would be the federal and maybe even state governments not caring about who is and isn't married and treating all individuals the same in the eyes of getting from and being taxed by the government.

Ding ding ding!

Leave marriage to the churches (or temples, or mosques), and **** the tax breaks universally. Then, nobody would care what government thought!

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:11 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
So... no tax breaks until married couple (anyone) is responsible for a child, adopted or otherwise?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:33 pm 
Offline
Asian Blonde

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 2075
Maybe thats the trick, it's the kids who get the tax breaks, and parents must fight to keep them around to receive it!

Im sure that'll do wonders on adoption rates...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 5:58 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Well in my perfect government ideal we have this thing called a flat tax anyway.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 6:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Rorinthas wrote:
Well in my perfect government ideal we have this thing called a flat tax anyway.

Fair Tax, but yes.

Lenas, if we insist on offering tax breaks for kids (despite already distributing much of the cost of children across the rest of society already, via public education and increasing student aid for post-secondary education), then that's the way I'd do it. Get rid of the marriage tax advantages, and instead increase the dependent deductions for working incomes.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:02 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Who gets to claim the kids?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Nobody because there are no deductions just a flat percentage of your gross income.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:30 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Rorinthas wrote:
Nobody because there are no deductions just a flat percentage of your gross income.

But if marriage isn't recognized then you would file separately. So which return reflects the kids or do both adjust their gross income? Do you get to deduct your kids if you are a deadbeat? How's that work under the current system anyway?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:41 am 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
The idea was hinging on the assumption that everyone could be recognized as "married." I don't see a return being a problem when it's a percentage based on your gross income. Deadbeat parents = less income = less tax break = less reason to have kids? Don't make enough and the kids are hungry? Off to social services, hopefully to be adopted (with incentive!) by a more supportive family.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 12:23 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
I have no idea how the curent system works as far as deadbeats and a deduction. No one would claim the children on the taxes because there would be no reason too do so. Everyone just pays X percent off your gross pay. No adjustments deductions exclusions or transfusions allowed.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 12:25 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Rori wrote:
I have no idea how the curent system works as far as deadbeats and a deduction. No one would claim the children on the taxes because there would be no reason too do so. Everyone just pays X percent off your gross pay. No adjustments deductions exclusions or transfusions allowed.


Or we could stop taxing income at all, based upon its disincentive affect on achievement, unjust and corrupt application, tendency to destroy wealth, and foundation in communist thought.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 9:17 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Baby steps, D, baby steps. We got to ween them off slowly.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Civil unions should be offered to any 2 consenting adults, whether they are a "couple" or not. The government should regulate this as a contract, not regulate couplehood.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 12:33 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
My company offers benefits to "life-partners" regardless of whether they are same sex or opposite sex. The qualification is that you have to live together for 6 months.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Hopwin wrote:
My company offers benefits to "life-partners" regardless of whether they are same sex or opposite sex. The qualification is that you have to live together for 6 months.

Sweet! DFK!, his fiance, and I are all life-partners, and two of us can drop our health insurance premiums...

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 12:54 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
My company offers benefits to "life-partners" regardless of whether they are same sex or opposite sex. The qualification is that you have to live together for 6 months.

Sweet! DFK!, his fiance, and I are all life-partners, and two of us can drop our health insurance premiums...

You wouldn't catch any flak from my company over it. Poly-whatever-you-call-it is fine.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 2:10 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
And as a private company that us their decision to make.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 271 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group