The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 1:23 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 8:15 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
As the US moves more towards the European social benefits model, the Europeans look for ways to stop their system from collapsing. Is this a surprise to anyone? We've been hearing this is coming for years.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/world ... anted=1&hp

Spoiler:
PARIS — Across Western Europe, the “lifestyle superpower,” the assumptions and gains of a lifetime are suddenly in doubt. The deficit crisis that threatens the euro has also undermined the sustainability of the European standard of social welfare, built by left-leaning governments since the end of World War II.

Europeans have boasted about their social model, with its generous vacations and early retirements, its national health care systems and extensive welfare benefits, contrasting it with the comparative harshness of American capitalism.

Europeans have benefited from low military spending, protected by NATO and the American nuclear umbrella. They have also translated higher taxes into a cradle-to-grave safety net. “The Europe that protects” is a slogan of the European Union.

But all over Europe governments with big budgets, falling tax revenues and aging populations are experiencing rising deficits, with more bad news ahead.

With low growth, low birthrates and longer life expectancies, Europe can no longer afford its comfortable lifestyle, at least not without a period of austerity and significant changes. The countries are trying to reassure investors by cutting salaries, raising legal retirement ages, increasing work hours and reducing health benefits and pensions.


“We’re now in rescue mode,” said Carl Bildt, Sweden’s foreign minister. “But we need to transition to the reform mode very soon. The ‘reform deficit’ is the real problem,” he said, pointing to the need for structural change.

The reaction so far to government efforts to cut spending has been pessimism and anger, with an understanding that the current system is unsustainable.

In Athens, Aris Iordanidis, 25, an economics graduate working in a bookstore, resents paying high taxes to finance Greece’s bloated state sector and its employees. “They sit there for years drinking coffee and chatting on the telephone and then retire at 50 with nice fat pensions,” he said. “As for us, the way things are going we’ll have to work until we’re 70.”

In Rome, Aldo Cimaglia is 52 and teaches photography, and he is deeply pessimistic about his pension. “It’s going to go belly-up because no one will be around to fill the pension coffers,” he said. “It’s not just me; this country has no future.”

Changes have now become urgent. Europe’s population is aging quickly as birthrates decline. Unemployment has risen as traditional industries have shifted to Asia. And the region lacks competitiveness in world markets.

According to the European Commission, by 2050 the percentage of Europeans older than 65 will nearly double. In the 1950s there were seven workers for every retiree in advanced economies. By 2050, the ratio in the European Union will drop to 1.3 to 1.

“The easy days are over for countries like Greece, Portugal and Spain, but for us, too,” said Laurent Cohen-Tanugi, a French lawyer who did a study of Europe in the global economy for the French government. “A lot of Europeans would not like the issue cast in these terms, but that is the storm we’re facing. We can no longer afford the old social model, and there is a real need for structural reform.”

In Paris, Malka Braniste, 88, lives on the pension of her deceased husband. “I’m worried for the next generations,” she said at lunch with her daughter-in-law, Dominique Alcan, 49. “People who don’t put money aside won’t get anything.”

Ms. Alcan expects to have to work longer as a traveling saleswoman. “But I’m afraid I’ll never reach the same level of comfort,” she said. “I won’t be able to do my job at 63; being a saleswoman requires a lot of energy.”

Gustave Brun d’Arre, 18, is still in high school. “The only thing we’re told is that we will have to pay for the others,” he said, sipping a beer at a cafe. The waiter interrupted, discussing plans to alter the French pension system. “It will be a mess,” the waiter said. “We’ll have to work harder and longer in our jobs.”

Figures show the severity of the problem. Gross public social expenditures in the European Union increased from 16 percent of gross domestic product in 1980 to 21 percent in 2005, compared with 15.9 percent in the United States. In France, the figure now is 31 percent, the highest in Europe, with state pensions making up more than 44 percent of the total and health care, 30 percent.

The challenge is particularly daunting in France, which has done less to reduce the state’s obligations than some of its neighbors. In Sweden and Switzerland, 7 of 10 people work past 50. In France, only half do. The legal retirement age in France is 60, while Germany recently raised it to 67 for those born after 1963.


With the retirement of the baby boomers, the number of pensioners will rise 47 percent in France between now and 2050, while the number under 60 will remain stagnant. The French call it “du baby boom au papy boom,” and the costs, if unchanged, are unsustainable. The French state pension system today is running a deficit of 11 billion euros, or about $13.8 billion; by 2050, it will be 103 billion euros, or $129.5 billion, about 2.6 percent of projected economic output.

President Nicolas Sarkozy has vowed to pass major pension reform this year. There have been two contentious overhauls, in 2003 and 2008; the government, afraid to lower pensions, wants to increase taxes on high salaries and increase the years of work.

But the unions are unhappy, and the Socialist Party opposes raising the retirement age. Polls show that while most French see a pension overhaul as necessary, up to 60 percent say working past 60 is not the answer.

Jean-François Copé, the parliamentary leader for Mr. Sarkozy’s center-right party, says that change is painful, but necessary. “The point is to preserve our model and keep it,” he said. “We need to get rid of bad habits. The Germans did it, and we can do the same.”

More broadly, many across Europe say the Continent will have to adapt to fiscal and demographic change, because social peace depends on it. “Europe won’t work without that,” said Joschka Fischer, the former German foreign minister, referring to the state’s protective role. “In Europe we have nationalism and racism in a politicized manner, and those parties would have exploited grievances if not for our welfare state,” he said. “It’s a matter of national security, of our democracy.”

France will ultimately have to follow Sweden and Germany in raising the pension age, he argues. “This will have to be harmonized, Europeanized, or it won’t work — you can’t have a pension at 67 here and 55 in Greece,” Mr. Fischer said.

The problems are even more acute in the “new democracies” of the euro zone — Greece, Portugal and Spain — that embraced European democratic ideals and that Europe embraced for political reasons in the postwar era, perhaps before their economies were ready. They have built lavish state systems on the back of the euro, but now must change.

Under threat of default, Greece has frozen pensions for three years and drafted a bill to raise the legal retirement age to 65. Greece froze public-sector pay and trimmed benefits for state employees, including a bonus two months of salary. Portugal has cut 5 percent from the salaries of senior public employees and politicians and increased taxes, while canceling big projects; Spain is cutting civil service salaries by 5 percent and freezing pay in 2011 while also chopping public projects.

But all three need to do more to bolster their competitiveness and growth, mostly by changing deeply inflexible employment rules, which can make it prohibitively expensive to hire or fire staff members, keeping unemployment high.

Jean-Claude Meunier is 68, a retired French Navy official and headhunter, who plays bridge to “train my memory and avoid Alzheimer’s.” His main worry is pension. “For years, our political leaders acted with very little courage,” he said. “Pensions represent the failure of the leaders and the failure of the system.”

In Athens, Mr. Iordanidis, the graduate who makes 800 euros a month in a bookstore, said he saw one possible upside. “It could be a chance to overhaul the whole rancid system,” he said, “and create a state that actually works.”

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 8:55 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Quote:
Europeans have benefited from low military spending, protected by NATO and the American nuclear umbrella.


There you have it, folks. They've cut defense and cut defense for 60 years and now there's very little defense left to be cut. You can't pay for social progrms that way. You just eventually end up with a crippled military that can't be cut anymore, a social welfare pig that keeps growing, an aging population that's learned life is supposed to be all about taking it easy ont he government dime, and an ally that's sick and tired of paying for your defense.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 12:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
I think the idea that Euros don't spend much on the military is quite exaggerated:

Wikipedia wrote:
US = $548,531,000,000 (4.0% of GDP)
EU (total) = $254,633,000,000 (1.4% of GDP)
China = $63,643,000,000 (2.0% of GDP)
Russia = $38,238,000,000 (3.5% of GDP)


Obviously, they could raise their spending as a % of GDP, but in raw dollars, they're spending 4 times as much as the Chinese and almost 7 times as much as the Russians. And compared to pretty much anywhere else in the world (Brazil = $15.5 billion, Iran = $6 billion, Pakistan = $4 billion, Nigeria = $1.2 billion) they're outspending other countries by incredible amounts. I mean jeez, they're spending more than 40 times as much as the big, bad Iranians! So, by really any comparative standard, the Euros spend vast amounts of money on their militaries. It's just that US spending is so huge that we make everyone look cheap.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 2:00 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
RangerDave wrote:
I think the idea that Euros don't spend much on the military is quite exaggerated:

Wikipedia wrote:
US = $548,531,000,000 (4.0% of GDP)
EU (total) = $254,633,000,000 (1.4% of GDP)
China = $63,643,000,000 (2.0% of GDP)
Russia = $38,238,000,000 (3.5% of GDP)


Obviously, they could raise their spending as a % of GDP, but in raw dollars, they're spending 4 times as much as the Chinese and almost 7 times as much as the Russians. And compared to pretty much anywhere else in the world (Brazil = $15.5 billion, Iran = $6 billion, Pakistan = $4 billion, Nigeria = $1.2 billion) they're outspending other countries by incredible amounts. I mean jeez, they're spending more than 40 times as much as the big, bad Iranians! So, by really any comparative standard, the Euros spend vast amounts of money on their militaries. It's just that US spending is so huge that we make everyone look cheap.


No, they really are not. The EU/NATO collectively is comparable in size to the U.S. in terms of land area and population (in the sense of being in the same category of size) yet it spends less than half, collectively, of what the U.S. does. This is, in fact, why it complains about unilateral U.S. action; it wants the U.S. to provide the forces but submit them to everyone else's command getting just one national vote in how they are used. The same is true of Canada but to a much lesser degree since it has a far smaller population and military.

This is most obvious in terms of naval forces; the U.S. has 10 nuclear powered supercarriers and their associated battle groups. Europe should have at least 4, but in fact it has NO supercarriers, and only one full-sized carrier in comission (as in, capable of operating non-VSTOL aircraft), and not a single cruiser comapred to 22 cruisers for the U.S. This is partly because the European defence budget is split among numerous countries but the real reason is that Europe expects to have U.S. carriers present if it needs them, all the while castigating us if we use them in ways they don't care for.

As for a comparison, raw dollar numbers are rather pointless because Russian, Chinese, and other servicement form the nations you cite are paid far, far less, and they use less modern, cheaper weapons in far greater proportions. Although the USSR tank swarm and the Chinese human wave ae things of the past, they ultimately still rely on cheap stuff in greater numbers and simply spend less on keeping either the soldier or his weapon or vehicle alive compared to either Europe or the U.S.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 2:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
It seems to me that the fundamental problem is the low birth rate, not the socialism. If they were still running the birth rate of the 50s and 60s there would be no problems with the social programs. That definitely feeds into the military too, they have less young people to put into their armies. That's not new either, a major reason France lost in WWII was their relatively low birthrate for the time.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Xequecal wrote:
It seems to me that the fundamental problem is the low birth rate, not the socialism. If they were still running the birth rate of the 50s and 60s there would be no problems with the social programs.


If they didn't have the social programs, the low birth rate would be no problem.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 4:06 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Xequecal wrote:
It seems to me that the fundamental problem is the low birth rate, not the socialism. If they were still running the birth rate of the 50s and 60s there would be no problems with the social programs.


If they didn't have the social programs, the low birth rate would be no problem.


Yeah, but what would their quality of life be like without the social programs?

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 5:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Xequecal wrote:
It seems to me that the fundamental problem is the low birth rate, not the socialism. If they were still running the birth rate of the 50s and 60s there would be no problems with the social programs.


If they didn't have the social programs, the low birth rate would be no problem.


Sure it would. It would just be a different problem, namely the older people who either couldn't or chose not to save will be dying in the street.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Xequecal wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Xequecal wrote:
It seems to me that the fundamental problem is the low birth rate, not the socialism. If they were still running the birth rate of the 50s and 60s there would be no problems with the social programs.


If they didn't have the social programs, the low birth rate would be no problem.


Sure it would. It would just be a different problem, namely the older people who either couldn't or chose not to save will be dying in the street.


Anyone have some statistics on how many old people "died in the street" prior to the Social Security program?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 7:16 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Xequecal wrote:
It seems to me that the fundamental problem is the low birth rate, not the socialism. If they were still running the birth rate of the 50s and 60s there would be no problems with the social programs. That definitely feeds into the military too, they have less young people to put into their armies. That's not new either, a major reason France lost in WWII was their relatively low birthrate for the time.


No it wasn't. Who told you this? The main reasons the French lost were that the BEF and a large amount of French forces had to be evacuated after being cut off by the unexpected German Ardennes offensive, followed by having the worthless Maginot line outflanked, followed in turn by Italian entry into the war.

The low French birthrate and overall population forced France to mobilize most of its young adult male population which would have been a serious problem in a long campaign but as it happened the issue was decided before that became an issue. The French forces actually outnumbered the Wehrmacht 6 million to 5.4 million before counting Allied troops anyhow.

In any case, large populations aren't needed for proper defense these days. Even China has only a 2 million man active army. What's needed is less cheap-ass defence with smaller, less-capable systems being used to save money and more training for the military that does exist. If they were spending more on training we wouldn't have stories of NATO troops that can't patrol because they're too fat and too incompetant, thereby leaving all the hard stuff to the U.S., Britain, and Canada. Of course, maybe they want it that way because it allows them to use their militaries as another social welfare system and keeps their hands lilly-white in the eyes of their populations that want to not work and ***** about American nukes that they conveniently ignore are there so their own governments can "borrow" them.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 7:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
There's a great trade off... have children to support the pyramid scheme and further screw the environment...

Lets argue it would be better to maintain the past population growths rather than face the inevitable situation that it can't be sustained forever.

/thumbs up


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 9:41 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Is friend of mine who is British and also a mild socialist seems to think that the EU will give up it's remaining national identity and become a proper fedalist nation- a United States of Europe if you will- rather than give up the wellfare state.

Scary, eh?

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 9:44 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Sounds like he thinks that because he hopes that.. and why does he think combining into one nation will help? Has he explained?

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 1:12 am 
Offline
Bitterness, Love & Violence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:47 pm
Posts: 459
Location: Valhalla
Franz Kafka - Ein altes Blatt
Quote:
Es ist, als wäre viel vernachlässigt worden in der Verteidigung unseres Vaterlandes. Wir haben uns bisher nicht darum gekümmert und sind unserer Arbeit nachgegangen; die Ereignisse der letzten Zeit machen uns aber Sorgen.

Ich habe eine Schusterwerkstatt auf dem Platz vor dem kaiserlichen Palast. Kaum öffne ich in der Morgendämmerung meinen Laden, sehe ich schon die Eingänge aller hier einlaufenden Gassen von Bewaffneten besetzt. Es sind aber nicht unsere Soldaten, sondern offenbar Nomaden aus dem Norden. Auf eine mir unbegreifliche Weise sind sie bis in die Hauptstadt gedrungen, die doch sehr weit von der Grenze entfernt ist. Jedenfalls sind sie also da; es scheint, daß jeden Morgen mehr werden.

Ihrer Natur entsprechend lagern sie unter freiem Himmel, denn Wohnhäuser verabscheuen sie. Sie beschäftigen sich mit dem Schärfen der Schwerter, dem Zuspitzen der Pfeile, mit Übungen zu Pferde. Aus diesem stillen, immer ängstlich rein gehaltenen Platz haben sie einen wahren Stall gemacht. Wir versuchen zwar manchmal aus unseren Geschäften hervorzulaufen und wenigstens den ärgsten Unrat wegzuschaffen, aber es geschieht immer seltener, denn die Anstrengung ist nutzlos und bringt uns überdies in die Gefahr, unter die wilden Pferde zu kommen oder von den Peitschen verletzt zu werden.

Sprechen kann man mit den Nomaden nicht. Unsere Sprache kennen sie nicht, ja sie haben kaum eine eigene. Untereinander verständigen sie sich ähnlich wie Dohlen. Immer wieder hört man diesen Schrei der Dohlen. Unsere Lebensweise, unsere Einrichtungen sind ihnen ebenso unbegreiflich wie gleichgültig. Infolgedessen zeigen sie sich auch gegen jede Zeichensprache ablehnend. Du magst dir die Kiefer verrenken und die Hände aus den Gelenken winden, sie haben dich doch nicht verstanden und werden dich nie verstehen. Oft machen sie Grimassen; dann dreht sich das Weiß ihrer Augen und Schaum schwillt aus ihrem Munde, doch wollen sie damit weder etwas sagen noch auch erschrecken; sie tun es, weil es so ihre Art ist. Was sie brauchen, nehmen sie. Man kann nicht sagen, daß sie Gewalt anwenden. Vor ihrem Zugriff tritt man beiseite und überläßt ihnen alles.

Auch von meinen Vorräten haben sie manches gute Stück genommen. Ich kann aber darüber nicht klagen, wenn ich zum Beispiel zusehe, wie es dem Fleischer gegenüber geht. Kaum bringt er seine Waren ein, ist ihm schon alles entrissen und wird von den Nomaden verschlungen. Auch ihre Pferde fressen Fleisch; oft liegt ein Reiter neben seinem Pferd und beide nähren sich vom gleichen Fleischstück, jeder an einem Ende. Der Fleischhauer ist ängstlich und wagt es nicht, mit den Fleischlieferungen aufzuhören. Wir verstehen das aber, schießen Geld zusammen und unterstützen ihn. Bekämen die Nomaden kein Fleisch, wer weiß, was ihnen zu tun einfiele; wer weiß allerdings, was ihnen einfallen wird, selbst wenn sie täglich Fleisch bekommen.

Letzthin dachte der Fleischer, er könne sich wenigstens die Mühe des Schlachtens sparen, und brachte am Morgen einen lebendigen Ochsen. Das darf er nicht mehr wiederholen. Ich lag wohl eine Stunde ganz hinten in meiner Werkstatt platt auf dem Boden und alle meine Kleider, Decken und Polster hatte ich über mir aufgehäuft, nur um das Gebrüll des Ochsen nicht zu hören, den von allen Seiten die Nomaden ansprangen, um mit den Zähnen Stücke aus seinem warmen Fleisch zu reißen. Schon lange war es still, ehe ich mich auszugehen getraute; wie Trinker um ein Weinfaß lagen sie müde um die Reste des Ochsen.

Gerade damals glaubte ich den Kaiser selbst in einem Fenster des Palastes gesehen zu haben; niemals sonst kommt er in diese äußeren Gemächer, immer nur lebt er in dem innersten Garten; diesmal aber stand er, so schien es mir wenigstens, an einem der Fenster und blickte mit gesenktem Kopf auf das Treiben vor seinem Schloß.

»Wie wird es werden?«, fragen wir uns alle. »Wie lange werden wir diese Last und Qual ertragen? Der kaiserliche Palast hat die Nomaden angelockt, versteht es aber nicht, sie wieder zu vertreiben. Das Tor bleibt verschlossen; die Wache, früher immer festlich ein und ausmarschierend, hält sich hinter vergitterten Fenstern. Uns Handwerkern und Geschäftsleuten ist die Rettung des Vaterlandes anvertraut; wir sind aber einer solchen Aufgabe nicht gewachsen; haben uns doch auch nie gerühmt, dessen fähig zu sein. Ein Mißverständnis ist es; und wir gehen daran zugrunde.


...ruh roh

_________________
"I've got twenty ways to tell you shut the f*ck up / nineteen of them are twenty-four bars long / the other one goes: SHUT THE F*CK UP" - Aesop Rock
"There is no God higher than truth." -- Gandhi
Formerly: Tulamian


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 4:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
To be perfectly honest, the European Mediterranian "bailout" is not going to work. There is no way these countries can come to terms with their debt, the "bailout" is just so the big German, French, and English banks as well as politically connected individuals can foist their bad Mediterranian debt onto the taxpayers before they let it fall apart.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 6:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:54 am
Posts: 2369
Rorinthas wrote:
Is friend of mine who is British and also a mild socialist seems to think that the EU will give up it's remaining national identity and become a proper fedalist nation- a United States of Europe if you will- rather than give up the wellfare state.

Scary, eh?


I would think the opposite. If I'm Germany and I've been pushing up my retirement rates and trying to at least be (relatively) fiscally responsible about my welfare state system, and then be forced to bail out nations like Greece and Portugal etc, I'd want out of that deal.

As for the low birth rate, definitely a problem, but I was under the impression they are able to mitigate it through immigration. That's another problem in and of itself of course.

_________________
“Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general”. - Mark Rippetoe


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 8:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
From an article today:

Quote:
Some basic economics make the Greek crisis universal.

From the first quarter of 2001 to the third quarter of 2009, unit labor costs in Greece -- that's how much a worker earned for producing one unit of something -- rose 33%. That's a 33% increase in the cost of producing one gimcrack in Greece after you've deducted all the benefits of any increase in the productivity of Greek workers. In other words, if a Greek worker went from making one gizmo an hour to making two an hour and got paid twice as much for that hour, the unit-labor-cost increase would be 0%.

Greek productivity did climb, at an average annual rate of about 2% from 2000 to 2010. Greece showed the same productivity growth as Germany, but wages climbed faster. According to Greece's national collective labor agreement, wages rose 6.2% in 2006, 5.4% in 2007, 6.2% in 2008 and 5.7% in 2009.

The result was that Greece priced itself out of global export markets. If your unit labor costs climb 33% while those of Italy go up just 30% and those of Spain 28% -- and while Germany's costs increase just 6% and U.S. costs plummet 27% (as they did from 2001 to 2009) -- you can be sure that selling your exports will get harder.

And as Greece was becoming less competitive, it was growing older. In 1971, 11.1% of Greeks were 65 or older, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. By 2001, that was up to 17%. By the end of 2009, 18.7%. The OECD takes its estimates out all the way to 2050. By 2031, 25% of Greeks will be 65 or older. By 2050, the figure is likely to close in on a third, at 32.5%.


and..

Quote:
To understand the full extent of Greece's debt problem you have to look beyond the current deficit problem. That's bad enough, with the net debt level forecast to rise to 120% of gross domestic product this year.

But you have to add in the value of all those promises made to the retired and soon-to-be retired. Economist Jagadeesh Gokhale, in a report for the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, calculates that adding the value of the liabilities in those promises brings the level of government liabilities to 875% of GDP.


Quote:
Greek politicians weren't alone in promising future benefits to voters. The average burden of debt, plus liability for pension and other social-service promises, averages 434% of GDP across the European Union. France, with its relatively generous social benefits, comes in at 549%. The United Kingdom stands at 442% and Germany at 418%. Spain, which has a bigger current deficit but relatively modest promises to its citizens, shows up in Gokhale's calculations at 244%.

And the United States? By these calculations, the debt-plus-promises burden comes to 890% of GDP. Move over Greece. Who's your daddy?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 9:23 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Ladas:

It's actually worse than that ...

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 9:31 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
I am sorry, I am still stunned by the concept of a "national collective labor agreement".

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 9:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Khross wrote:
Ladas:

It's actually worse than that ...

I know.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 9:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
I'm strongly suspecting that to get to 890% of GDP they're calculating that Social Security will pay 100%, when even SS says that they won't.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 10:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Xequecal wrote:
I'm strongly suspecting that to get to 890% of GDP they're calculating that Social Security will pay 100%, when even SS says that they won't.

Did you at least feel the wind move your hair or hear the whoosh?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 10:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
But don't worry Xequecal, with POGO promised void, our government will make up sure we live up to and surpass that 890% target.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 11:22 am 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
Loki wrote:
Franz Kafka - Ein altes Blatt

[...]

...ruh roh


Translation:

Spoiler:
AN OLD MANUSCRIPT
FRANZ KAFKA

It looks as if much has been neglected in our country’s system of defense. We have not concerned ourselves with it until now and have gone about our daily work; but things that have been happening recently begin to trouble us.

I have a cobbler’s workshop in the square that lies before the Emperor’s palace. Scarcely have I taken my shutters down, at the first glimpse of dawn, when I see armed soldiers already posted in the mouth of every street opening on the square. But these soldiers are not ours; they are obviously nomads from the North. In some way that is incomprehensible to me they have pushed right into the capital, although it is a long way from the frontier. At any rate, here they are; it seems that every morning there are more of them.

As is their nature, they camp under the open sky, for they abominate dwelling houses. They busy themselves sharpening swords, whittling arrows and practicing horsemanship. This peaceful square, which was always kept scrupulously clean, they have made literally into a stable. We do try every now and then to run out of our shops and clear away at least the worst of the filth, but this happens less and less often, for the labor is in vain and brings us besides into danger of falling under the hoofs of the wild horses or of being crippled with lashes from the whips.

Speech with the nomads is impossible. They do not know our language; indeed they hardly have a language of their own. They communicate with each other much as jackdaws do. A screeching of jackdaws is always in our ears. Our way of living and our institutions they neither understand nor care to understand. And so they are unwilling to make sense even out of our sign language. You can gesture at them till you dislocate your jaws and your wrists and still they will not have understood you and will never understand. They often make grimaces; then the whites of their eyes turn up and foam gathers on their lips, but they do not mean anything by that, not even a threat; they do it because it is their nature to do it. Whatever they need, they take. You cannot call it taking by force. They grab at something and you simply stand aside and leave them to it.

From my stock, too, they have taken many good articles. But I cannot complain when I see how the butcher, for instance, suffers across the street. As soon as he brings in any meat the nomads snatch it all from him and gobble it up. Even their horses devour flesh; often enough a horseman and his horse are lying side by side, both of them gnawing at the same joint, one at either end. The butcher is nervous and does not dare to stop his deliveries of meat. We understand that, however, and subscribe money to keep him going. If the nomads got no meat, who knows what they might think of doing; who knows anyhow what they may think of, even though they get meat every day.

Not long ago the butcher thought he might at least spare himself the trouble of slaughtering, and so one morning he brought along a live ox. But he will never date to do that again. I lay for a whole hour flat on the floor at the back of my workshop with my head muffled in all the clothes and rugs and pillows I had, simply to keep from hearing the bellowing of that ox, which the nomads were leaping on from all sides, tearing morsels out of its living flesh with their teeth. It had been quiet for a long time before I risked coming out; they were lying overcome round the remains of the carcass like drunkards round a wine cask.

This was the occasion when I fancied I actually saw the Emperor himself at the window of the palace; usually he never enters these outer rooms but spends all of his time in the innermost garden; yet on this occasion he was standing, or so at least it seemed to me, at one of the windows, watching with bent head the on goings before his residence.

“What is going to happen?” we all ask ourselves. “How long can we endure this burden and torment? The Emperor’s palace has drawn the nomads here but does not know how to drive them away again. The gate stays shut; the guards, who used to be always marching out and in with ceremony, keep close behind barred windows. It is left to us artisans and tradesmen to save our country; but we are not equal to such a task; nor have we ever claimed to be capable of it. This is a misunderstanding of some kind; and it will be the ruin of us.”

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 197 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group