Taskiss wrote:
Let me guess - you have a rack of servers that aren't on maintenance anymore and you want them to run with something current?
Sadly, being out of maintenance means nothing on this.
At the company I am with:
We have a switch that is still under service contract. We do not run at the newest and latest software, we run a few versions behind.
Supposedly on stable releases of the software. We had a software upgrade that we ran on our lab equipment for a few weeks with no issues.
When we deployed the software to our live servers, we started having massive redundancy fail overs. We get our vendor back on the phone and they seem stunned. BUT.... the exact same bug is present on a newer version of the software and they are working on a patch for it already.
"So let me get this straight: Your QA group apparently not only missed this bug on the newest software, but on the last several versions as well?"
"Well we did not know the bug would affect this version of the software, the patch may fix your equipment."
"So in order to fix the bugs you implemented last time we upgraded... you required us to upgrade to this version, which has stability issues."
"Yeah, sorry good luck on getting this working!"
"Really? We pay you for service and you wish us good luck getting your bugged product to work?"