Rynar wrote:
No. He isn't taking anything out of context.
Your expressed viewpoint gives all forms of despotism, past or present, the Grace of God.
Yes he is. Anything in the Bible must be taken in context of the entire rest of the Bible.
Furthermore, the requirements in this section do not apply to obeying a leader that is (in his leadership, not in his personal life; leaders can no more be perfect people than anyone else) not following God's law himself. Leaders are bound by the same commandments as anyone else. This passage is not a license for abuse.
As to whether it's giving "despotism the Grace of God", whether it is or not is irrelevant. That's just an appeal to consequences. God does not have to adhere to earthly political ideas, principles, or philosophy
at all. Who are you to tell God he cannot endorse despoitism if He pleases? It all exists at His sufferance and because of Him in the first place.
As to whether the words of the Apostle are as important as the words of Christ - everything that is in the Bible is the Word of Christ because He is God. What history has allowed to enter into canon has been so because He has allowed it. It is absurd to think that God does not control His own Word. Yes, I'm aware of issues like the Apocrypha. Nothing in the disputed books between Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox is hugely important; and more importantly, we must trust God to do His job and be God. What He allows into His word he does for His reasons.