I always get a kick out of folks that ramble on about topics they haven't a clue about. I suppose some just need to feel as though they are experts in every topic, even if they dead wrong about what they are rambling on about.
Quote:
1) It should cost less because they're still charging you additional fees to be able to play online.
So it should cost less because some people don't like the multiplayer game?
Funny enough, when *I* think of MW2, the single player game isn't the first thing I think about. In fact, I've yet to even touch my single player game at all; I jumped right in to multiplayer.
I'm not sure who the "they're" you are referring to in your sentence, but XBOX live charges roughtly a whopping .17 cents a day to play what ever multiplayer games I choose to online. It's not breaking my bank so I just don't understand people complaining that some games do not have the single player hours that others do. Should I buy a game that's ONLY single player style, my XBOX live account goes virtually untouched, so to me it all balances out in the end.
If you don't wish to fork over the $60 for the single player campaign in MW2 then just...don't. There's certainly no sense in arguing with others about it.
Quote:
2) MW2's multiplayer doesn't have any customizability beyond the first MW, and therefore probably took very little investment.
Well, you're wrong. Don't know where you're getting your information from but I can tell you that MW2 multiplayer has a LOT more custimazation then CoD4. If you're going to come and state something as a fact, you should at least research your accusations first so that you at least appear credible in what you're speaking of.