The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:51 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Talya wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
The internet is simply another public square.

You can say whatever you want in the public square. You can say your piece without disclosing who you are, but you don't have a right to have your identity protected. If I recognize you, I can out you with no consequences.

Government should not be involved in either protecting your anonymity nor revealing your identity. They should be neutral. If you can protect it, great. If not, oh well.



Indeed. But if they legally force a website to reveal the identity of the people posting reviews, they are getting involved, yes?


Yes.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Khross wrote:
Ummm ...

The Net Neutrality ruling means the internet is not a public square.


I'm voicing my opinion.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:54 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Khross wrote:
Ummm ...

The Net Neutrality ruling means the internet is not a public square.
I'm voicing my opinion.
You are capable of voicing your opinion in the White House foyer; that doesn't mean it is a public square either.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Khross wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Khross wrote:
Ummm ...

The Net Neutrality ruling means the internet is not a public square.
I'm voicing my opinion.
You are capable of voicing your opinion in the White House foyer; that doesn't mean it is a public square either.


So you're saying my opinion on what should be is incorrect? That's retarded.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
I think he's saying that just because you can stand in a place an speak your opinion, that doesn't mean it's a 'public square'.

Is this where we get into a prolonged Glade Style™ debate about the definition of "public square" ?

(why do I feel like I just got trolled ? :( )


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 7:13 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
First define both public and square, then you can define how the two together mean something substantially different from either word.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 7:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:20 am
Posts: 1037
Yep. According to http://www.merriam-webster.com/:

Public - of, relating to, paid for by, or working for a government

Square - a person who is conventional or conservative in taste or way of life

So from there, it's pretty clear that the concept of a public square is being dismantled by the libs as retribution for the right-wing conspiracy.

_________________
Image Image Image Image Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Midgen wrote:
I think he's saying that just because you can stand in a place an speak your opinion, that doesn't mean it's a 'public square'.

Is this where we get into a prolonged Glade Style™ debate about the definition of "public square" ?

(why do I feel like I just got trolled ? :( )


And I'm saying it should be treated similar to a public square. So what's the problem?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Responding to posts to clarify one's position is not trolling. Stop being a jackass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:51 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Müs wrote:
Midgen wrote:
Müs wrote:
If you feel strongly enough to leave a negative review about a shitty steak.


Sorry Arafys, but I'm not going to expose private/personal information (even just my real name) to people on a review site. I wouldn't even register for such a place.


Then you don't feel strongly enough to leave a negative review about a shitty steak ;)


Not at all. Some of us simply don't work in fields that enable us to publicly espouse certain viewpoints in public forums. Anonymity is essentially required for us to voice directed opinions on things, specifically negative opinions but sometimes positive ones as well.

In general, though, all people should follow the same level of rigor, regardless of our field.


In addition, and tangentially, it also comes back to understanding that disclosure of private data on the web can lead to all sort of amazing privacy concerns, and review websites would literally never be worth that.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:27 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
DFK! wrote:
In addition, and tangentially, it also comes back to understanding that disclosure of private data on the web can lead to all sort of amazing privacy concerns, and review websites would literally never be worth that.


This just means people will have to be more cautious about how they register.

Do you actually use real personal information on any website with an account you don't use to purchase things?

Seriously. The internet is as anonymous as you want it to be. They can't even locate you by IP if you are really paranoid and careful.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
Review sites are completely pointless if users aren't free to post completely anonymous reviews.

As both a (former) anonymous reviewer, and consumer of anonymous reviews, I doubt I will even bother to use sites like yelp any more.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:00 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Midgen wrote:
Review sites are completely pointless if users aren't free to post completely anonymous reviews.

As both a (former) anonymous reviewer, and consumer of anonymous reviews, I doubt I will even bother to use sites like yelp any more.


Or ensure Yelp has no way to figure out who you are when you post there.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 8:38 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Talya wrote:
Midgen wrote:
Review sites are completely pointless if users aren't free to post completely anonymous reviews.

As both a (former) anonymous reviewer, and consumer of anonymous reviews, I doubt I will even bother to use sites like yelp any more.


Or ensure Yelp has no way to figure out who you are when you post there.


Total anonymity from directed internet search efforts by properly equipped and trained individuals is a myth.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:55 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
DFK! wrote:
Talya wrote:
Midgen wrote:
Review sites are completely pointless if users aren't free to post completely anonymous reviews.

As both a (former) anonymous reviewer, and consumer of anonymous reviews, I doubt I will even bother to use sites like yelp any more.


Or ensure Yelp has no way to figure out who you are when you post there.


Total anonymity from directed internet search efforts by properly equipped and trained individuals is a myth.


It really isn't. First they need a warrant to force a site like Yelp to reveal your account.
Then when they realize that account info is useless, they need the ip. Then they track it down to the provider, and need a warrant to get the provider to reveal who leased that IP at the time of posting. Then they find out it's McDonald's, and they try to find out what McDonald's customer was connected to their wireless router at the time... they need a warrant to even force McDonald's to reveal that information, and then they find out...wait, McDonald's doesn't make people log on to their free wi-fi. It's an open network with no records of any kind.


Free wi-fi with no account info required is pretty much ubiquitous these days. In the unlikely event they get a warrant to force the provider to reveal who owns the IP you posted from, they're going to get Starbucks/McDonald's/your neighbor's unsecured wireless router/whatever. And the legal pressure of someone trying to track down who posted an anonymous review when there's no evidence of any crime or even libelous claim is going to prevent them from even getting that far.

You can argue that that's a bit of a pain in the neck to achieve anonymity, but seriously, only logging on to your anonymous accounts from free public wi-fi locations is far less of an inconvenience than the futile attempt to track you down. One requires a five minute drive and the purchase of a $1 coffee. The other requires tens of thousands of dollars of billable lawyer time and man-hours, likely for nothing.

If you're really paranoid, layer some "Anonymizer" security (or TOR) on top of that. Sure, a dedicated enough intelligence organization like the NSA could still track you down, but a company angry about your product review doesn't have those resources.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 5:15 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
If only there were some kind of media access control address that was specific to a device.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 5:27 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Talya wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Talya wrote:
Midgen wrote:
Review sites are completely pointless if users aren't free to post completely anonymous reviews.

As both a (former) anonymous reviewer, and consumer of anonymous reviews, I doubt I will even bother to use sites like yelp any more.


Or ensure Yelp has no way to figure out who you are when you post there.


Total anonymity from directed internet search efforts by properly equipped and trained individuals is a myth.


It really isn't. First they need a warrant to force a site like Yelp to reveal your account.
Then when they realize that account info is useless, they need the ip. Then they track it down to the provider, and need a warrant to get the provider to reveal who leased that IP at the time of posting. Then they find out it's McDonald's, and they try to find out what McDonald's customer was connected to their wireless router at the time... they need a warrant to even force McDonald's to reveal that information, and then they find out...wait, McDonald's doesn't make people log on to their free wi-fi. It's an open network with no records of any kind.


Free wi-fi with no account info required is pretty much ubiquitous these days. In the unlikely event they get a warrant to force the provider to reveal who owns the IP you posted from, they're going to get Starbucks/McDonald's/your neighbor's unsecured wireless router/whatever. And the legal pressure of someone trying to track down who posted an anonymous review when there's no evidence of any crime or even libelous claim is going to prevent them from even getting that far.

You can argue that that's a bit of a pain in the neck to achieve anonymity, but seriously, only logging on to your anonymous accounts from free public wi-fi locations is far less of an inconvenience than the futile attempt to track you down. One requires a five minute drive and the purchase of a $1 coffee. The other requires tens of thousands of dollars of billable lawyer time and man-hours, likely for nothing.

If you're really paranoid, layer some "Anonymizer" security (or TOR) on top of that. Sure, a dedicated enough intelligence organization like the NSA could still track you down, but a company angry about your product review doesn't have those resources.


I think that, while most of this is correct, you're underestimating intelligence capabilities of agencies and overestimating the "anonymizing" capabilities at your disposal.

For a simple business? Perhaps. But all key intelligence is pattern recognition, and even anonymous traffic creates a pattern.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:54 pm 
Offline
Not the ranger you're looking for
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 321
Location: Here
Corolinth wrote:
If only there were some kind of media access control address that was specific to a device.


LOL

_________________
"If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me." - Alice R. Longworth

"Good? Bad? I'm the guy with the gun." - Ash Williams


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:39 am
Posts: 452
Well damn, maybe they should use all these resources to take down the people who are openly sharing child pornography on the web.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:57 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Amanar wrote:
Well damn, maybe they should use all these resources to take down the people who are openly sharing child pornography on the web.
Which is exactly what they do ...

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92686

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-l-pu ... 62194.html

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:33 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Corolinth wrote:
If only there were some kind of media access control address that was specific to a device.


You do know that most NIC drivers allow you to change your MAC in software, don't you?
MAC addresses are also only transmitted on the local subnet. You can't determine a MAC by IP unless you're on the same local network.
Not only that, but most wireless access points aren't configured to keep a running log of MACs that have connected to it in the past, only those currently connected to it.
Lastly, nobody keeps a record of who individually owns which MAC address.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Last edited by Talya on Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:48 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
None of those things are absolutely true. The MAC address has its origins in pre- world wide web networks, many of which had a vested interest in knowing who was part of the network at any given point in time. What the MAC address is currently used for is less relevant than what it can be used for.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:59 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Corolinth wrote:
None of those things are absolutely true. The MAC address has its origins in pre- world wide web networks, many of which had a vested interest in knowing who was part of the network at any given point in time. What the MAC address is currently used for is less relevant than what it can be used for.


Most pre-world-wide-web networks tended to be "single subnets," unconnected to anything else, which is actually likely why the MAC is not routable.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 211 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group