Monte wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Doctors don't get multimillion dollar parachutes either, and they don't make money by providing substandard care.
Happens all the time. Ever heard of an HMO?
You will now show evidence that HMOs provide multimillion dollar golden parachutes to the average doctor.
Quote:
Quote:
They make money by being the best in their field; that's where money, attention, prestige, professional respect and new patients come from.
So, in your opinion, doctors are never bad at their job, never screw up, never provide poor or substandard care? Really?
So in your opinion it's ok to make a total strawman, and in doing so imply that lack of perfection is a reason for anything at all?
No, in my opinion doctors have strong incentives to try their best. They are not served by doing a poor job.
Quote:
Yeah. Because having your leg cut off when you were in for appendicitis is something we probably shouldn't really make sure to punish financially. Private business *definitely* needs to be held accountable and regulated, like government. And the bigger the business, the more it should be transparent and restrained.
Sorry, but I didn't say that there should be no regulation. You cannot hold up a gross error like a flase amputation and argue that means any arbitrary amount of control or accountability is needed because of that. It is not an argument that it needs to be controlled like government; in fact it indicates that you have no argument other than that you want it to be held accountable for accountability's sake.
It does not take a great deal of accountability to deal harshly with people who are total idiots and amputate the wrong limb.
Quote:
Granted, small private practices are not really what I am talking about.
Why? Becuase when you go in the little doctor's office, he and his workers are people you actually know and trust because you see them, but bigger medical establishments that you don't have a personal warm and fuzzy with are somehow automatically less trustworthy?
Quote:
I look at it like how the car companies decide on a recall or not. That speech, in the beginning of Fight Club? It's not bullshit. Large companies look at the potential costs of a large suit, and do the math. If they think they will make more money by allowing an unsafe product on to the market, they will do it. That's not the sort of calculation I think should ever be made, but I definitely think that it's not the kind of calculation that should be made regarding health care.
I don't see any reason why not. Health care is a limited commodity; like anything else. We could spend every single dollar on healthcare and always be in need of more. As long as there are restrictions on the scope of that authority to make those decisions, it's not a problem, and the biggest restriction is that people will stop paying for healthcare if it doesn't work.
As for fight club, I never saw it, and I don't give a **** what some Hollywood nitwit thought.