TheRiov wrote:
All anyone here has is the facts reported in the news.
You're editing out certain statements that you deem untrustworthy and then saying "OMG THOSE FASCIST THUGS"
Really? Quote where I said that.
Quote:
I'm drawing bad conclusions based on the stated conditions. If the stated conditions are untrue then obviously my conclusions would be re-evaluated. Then again, if the facts are in question, the debate is pointless since we have no common frame of reference.
FTFY. Your conclusions should be reevaluated based on your own inputs.
Quote:
You're inventing facts to fit a scenario that demonizes the police without based on your distrust of the established report. If you want to have a debate about just how factual local news reporting is, that's another discussion.
I'm not inventing anything. Even using your "facts", your conclusions are terrible.
Quote:
I'm taking the facts/statement's we're given, and using that as an established set of facts (maybe we'll get dash-cam) and making an assessment of the situation of that, without cherry picking my data.
Your coming to the conclusion that maybe he was planning on shooting the officers based on items he had in his apartment. It's a terrible conclusion. Ridiculous.