The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:59 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Hannibal wrote:
Xequecal wrote:
Am I the only one who doesn't see any contradictions in the article? A 71/21 split for more government amongst nonwhites easily overpowers a 52/39 split for less government amongst whites. The minority population of the US definitely trends younger, especially if illegal immigrants are counted and I see no way that these studies could exclude them.


The article is also saying that the non white liberals are fractured among ethnic lines. So the liberal dilemma is going to be how to wrangle the most votes across that spectrum. IMO that is going to lead to more of the same wishy washy policies that are big general ideas with few details.

Especially as whites become marginalized enough (either policy-wise as stuff goes through, or population-wise) that you can't use "anti-white" as a unifying platform.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 8:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Xequecal wrote:
Am I the only one who doesn't see any contradictions in the article? A 71/21 split for more government amongst nonwhites easily overpowers a 52/39 split for less government amongst whites. The minority population of the US definitely trends younger, especially if illegal immigrants are counted and I see no way that these studies could exclude them.

Sure, but in a majority-white country (with an even more overwhelmingly white representation in popular media), white people are often instinctively perceived as being the baseline/default unless non-white status is specified. Moreover, "what white people think" is often perceived/presented as having nothing to do with their race, whereas "what non-white people think" is perceived/presented as being affected by racial politics/bias. So, when an article says millenials lean liberal yet 52% of white millenials favor smaller government, that feels like an inconsistency to many people at first blush, and the 71/21 split in the other direction among non-white millenials (which explains the overall "liberal" characterization) is subconsciously set aside rather than being viewed as a co-equal part of what millenials as a whole think. In short, the gut takeaway for a lot of people is, "Except among minorities, most millenials actually favor smaller government, so it's silly to say millenials lean liberal."


Last edited by RangerDave on Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:12 am, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 8:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Quote:
Especially as whites become marginalized enough (either policy-wise as stuff goes through, or population-wise) that you can't use "anti-white" as a unifying platform.


The conservatives have this ten times worse, by the way. You have the Tea Party/libertarian conservatives and the religious right, who disagree on pretty much everything except gun control.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Xequecal wrote:
Quote:
Especially as whites become marginalized enough (either policy-wise as stuff goes through, or population-wise) that you can't use "anti-white" as a unifying platform.


The conservatives have this ten times worse, by the way. You have the Tea Party/libertarian conservatives and the religious right, who disagree on pretty much everything except gun control.

Which is why I've pretty well given up on voting Republican. I'm just excited to think that the Democrats will be facing similar troubles in the near future. Then, maybe the threat of the other side's unity won't hold our nation hostage to a two-party farce.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:29 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Xequecal wrote:
Quote:
Especially as whites become marginalized enough (either policy-wise as stuff goes through, or population-wise) that you can't use "anti-white" as a unifying platform.


The conservatives have this ten times worse, by the way. You have the Tea Party/libertarian conservatives and the religious right, who disagree on pretty much everything except gun control.

Which is why I've pretty well given up on voting Republican. I'm just excited to think that the Democrats will be facing similar troubles in the near future. Then, maybe the threat of the other side's unity won't hold our nation hostage to a two-party farce.

This is actually my concern. Amongst millennials at least it appears liberalism is no longer a unified political theory, instead you have people who identify it as a life-style choice rather than a philosophy or group of core beliefs. That would seem to indicate that people are voting liberal because they like to be called liberal rather than because they understand/buy into the policy choices of the people they are electing.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Last edited by Hopwin on Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Hopwin wrote:
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Xequecal wrote:
Quote:
Especially as whites become marginalized enough (either policy-wise as stuff goes through, or population-wise) that you can't use "anti-white" as a unifying platform.


The conservatives have this ten times worse, by the way. You have the Tea Party/libertarian conservatives and the religious right, who disagree on pretty much everything except gun control.

Which is why I've pretty well given up on voting Republican. I'm just excited to think that the Democrats will be facing similar troubles in the near future. Then, maybe the threat of the other side's unity won't hold our nation hostage to a two-party farce.

This is actually my concern. Amongst millennials at least it appears liberalism is no longer a unified political theory, instead you have people who identify it as a life-style choice rather than a philosophy or group of core beliefs. That would seem to indicate that people are voting liberal because they as liberal rather than because they understand/buy into the policy choices of the people they are electing.

So then the political landscape just shifts such that you get real liberals running and a bunch of LINOs trying to take advantage of that. A rose by any other name...

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:26 am 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
The country's ****. We need to start a new one on Mars.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:49 pm
Posts: 3455
Location: St. Louis, MO
But then the latency to all of my favorite game servers is going to be horrible.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:52 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
The GOP and tea Party puppeteers continued siding with the religious right is the disturbing thing for me. I could be convinced to vote for a economic conservative if I felt they would not be manipulated or forced into voting for anti-abortion, anti-evolution, anti-science, anti-reproductive/marriage equality, fundamentalist agenda. I have yet to see a candidate who can fit that bill. In the end we're forced to vote away from the party who has the most odious practices in our own hot button issues.

I'm pragmatic enough to vote for a candidate who can win if it means a more repellent official doesn't take rise.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:05 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Republicans are no more anti science than Democrats. In fact, they both hate the same scientific discipline.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:09 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Corolinth wrote:
Republicans are no more anti science than Democrats. In fact, they both hate the same scientific discipline.

^ That. If you took the Democratic anti-science firebrands and combined them with the Republican ones we'd be back to the stone age.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:41 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
That has not been my observation.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:46 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Let's peak under the Democrat anti-science movements:
Vaccinations
Nuclear Power
GMO
Holistic "Medicine"
Clean Fossil Fuels
Now I am sleepy, go here:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... n-science/
Quote:
There is more, and recent, antiscience fare from far-left progressives, documented in the 2012 book Science Left Behind (PublicAffairs) by science journalists Alex B. Berezow and Hank Campbell, who note that “if it is true that conservatives have declared a war on science, then progressives have declared Armageddon.”

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:48 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Xequecal wrote:
Quote:
Especially as whites become marginalized enough (either policy-wise as stuff goes through, or population-wise) that you can't use "anti-white" as a unifying platform.


The conservatives have this ten times worse, by the way. You have the Tea Party/libertarian conservatives and the religious right, who disagree on pretty much everything except gun control.


While that may be true (and they agree on plenty more than that) liberals have a myriad of different conflicting agendas lumped under "not white males". It even includes a lot of the "religious right". "Religious right" really means "WHITE fundamentalists", while everyone pretends black fundamentalists and to a lesser extent Hispanic fundamentalists and Catholics don't exist and aren't voting against the party line on social issues. It even includes large numbers of those racial minorities that are socially conservative for CULTURAL reasons, despite not being particularly religious.. since "socially conservative" is a euphamism for "sexually conservative" in order to exclude social issues where the right is CLEARLY more freedom-oriented... like gun control, for example.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:48 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Hopwin wrote:
Let's peak under the Democrat anti-science movements:
Vaccinations
Nuclear Power
GMO
Holistic "Medicine"
Clean Fossil Fuels
Now I am sleepy, go here:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... n-science/
Quote:
There is more, and recent, antiscience fare from far-left progressives, documented in the 2012 book Science Left Behind (PublicAffairs) by science journalists Alex B. Berezow and Hank Campbell, who note that “if it is true that conservatives have declared a war on science, then progressives have declared Armageddon.”


You can add evolution under there too, unless you think black fundamentalist churches that vote democrat and lean liberal on anything else don't preach Creationism.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 2:54 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
I didn't mean to suggest that there are not fundamentalists on the left side of the aisle. But that's not who gets them elected and in the end the elected officials end up voting with the loudest voices on 'their side'


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 3:05 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
TheRiov wrote:
I didn't mean to suggest that there are not fundamentalists on the left side of the aisle. But that's not who gets them elected and in the end the elected officials end up voting with the loudest voices on 'their side'


It's a very substantial portion of who gets them elected - if you mean "elected President". They just don't vote FOR PRESIDENT on those issues because they vote their wallets. When it comes to Congressional, state, and local elections though, they're voting skin color; and that means people likely to represent the same religious and social views as their community. Issues like Prop 8 in California end as they do in a large part because of ostensibly "liberal" voters, while the left gets away with pretending that it's the "religious white right" doing it.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 3:58 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Corolinth wrote:
Republicans are no more anti science than Democrats. In fact, they both hate the same scientific discipline.


Truth. In fact, if you want NASA funded as the absolutely-vital-to-the-future-of-humanity institution that it is, you pretty much have to vote GOP. Oh, they won't fund it ENOUGH, but the democrats tend to cut it more.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 184 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group