RangerDave wrote:
Hannibal wrote:
Would there have been private investment if the government did not toss its hat in?
Hard to say. There's been some talk that government loans/guarantees can crowd out private lenders in some circumstances because the government has first priority in bankruptcy, so if the government wasn't there, maybe more private lenders would have come in, and we'd have ended up with similar levels of private equity investors as well. Alternatively, I've seen some reports that private lenders were staying away because they were wary of Solyndra's business projections, in which case, absent the government, there would have been no debt funding and the private investors probably would have stayed away.
Conceptually, though, the whole idea of government loans/guarantees is to fund things private lenders/investors are reluctant to get into and, ultimately, to draw that private debt/equity funding into the deal.
Amazing as it may seem to a lot of people, Cheney probably had almost nothing to do with Haliburton's receipt of most contracts. A great many of the no-bid contracts were that way because they involved specialized requirements that only Haliburton had maintained the ability to meet.
It's much like contracts for nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. Newport News Shipbuilding (Now owned by Northrop Grumman) is the only company that can build these, and thus there is no point in competition; there will never be enough orders for such ships to allow for it. They have build every nuclear-powered carrier, and in fact every full sized carrier since
Enterprise.
I believe much of the same applies to KBR for a great deal of other more mundane contractor work in Iraq. When the needs these companies and their contracts service arise, they are needed
now, and it simply is not practicable for more than one company to maintain these capabilities. In the case of KBR, however, they already had a standing contract to provide support.
They also really do serve some decent chow.