Elmarnieh wrote:
What is the point of getting to ask questions if you can't ask the big questions.
Why not just send a foam cutout for everyone to hug and adorn with flowers?
Okay okay in all seriousness now...
We don't really ask them to come for fawning and accolades. By way of explanation, I work at a law school. One of the things that some of our kids participate in each year is an advocacy competition. Their efforts are judged by a bench of real sitting judges, and we try to bring in someone neat each time. Two years ago Clarence Thomas was the headliner, last year we had a panel of 6th Circuit judges, and this time around Kagan is coming.
So it's not like we asked them to come specifically to do interviews or q&a; they're there to preside over an event for the students. Now granted, they do other stuff while they're here; they'll hold lectures, probably speak at a lunch, etc. But you can probably make a case that it'd be bad form to have them come down and then ask them to defend themselves. In the question of whether Kagan ought to have recused herself over PPACA, someone in one of the articles I read noted that Clarence Thomas made a specific effort to qualify himself once, to explain his rationale for not recusing himself. I don't remember if it was for Monsanto or something else. But anyway, for whatever reason, Kagan hasn't chosen to explain herself, at least not in anything that I've seen. An advocacy competition for the students that a Justice of the US Supreme Court has agreed to attend probably isn't the best venue to choose to start taking her to task for her decisions. It's almost hubris to think that, okay, you haven't bowed to pressure yet to explain why you're still there for PPACA, but today you're going to answer it for us, you know?
Now, that's not to say that the question can't be asked! If she pipes up and says "man you all are too nice, someone give me a hard one!" then it's on