RangerDave wrote:
Fair enough. I'm mostly speaking in terms of my own views rather than whatever the relevant laws and school policies are in practice. It's also quite likely that my view is heavily influenced by my own anecdotal experiences and those of my family and friends, all of which are from low-crime settings and most of which are from rural settings to boot. I saw many fights in school, but none that didn't end with a teacher, janitor, coach, bus driver or whoever stepping in and pulling the kids apart. I'm sure things would be different in an urban and/or high-crime district.
Fair enough. My mother and some friends did the urban school thing for quite a well.
The rural/suburban setting is changed though, and you may not recognize it. Schools don't want teachers or anybody else stopping fights unless they're the "proper" authority to do so. Schools are afraid of lawsuits. If I'm the teacher/intervener, I'm afraid of prosecution or harm to self.
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
If someone, like Arathin, wants to be "**** the consequences" that's fine, but I don't blame him (the driver) for not wanting to and he shouldn't be held legally liable for not doing so in light of school policy.
To be honest, the consequences of not intervening are far worse.
For the kid, not for you.
No, for me. I think I would have a hard time coming to terms with my cowardice and waste of space.
(To reiterate, I'm not judging anyone who feels it is unsafe for them physically to intervene. I would, I think - always tough to say - intervene regardless, but I can't demand that of others. I'm only referring to folks who are more concerned about their pocketbooks or being punished than a 13YO boy.)
Also "fair enough." Again, I wouldn't call it cowardice in this circumstance though.
To your point of "demand that of others," that's a very good discussion as well: for people who feel the driver should have intervened, how far does "should" go? Are we compelling action, under the views of those people, or is it a moral "should?"
Ultimately, it comes back to incentives. We have created incentives to stay a sheep, and disincentives to be a sheep dog. Personally, in such an environment, I don't think it's very "right" of me to judge others for being not helping.
And don't get me wrong, I have NO problem judging others in a myriad of circumstances. Just not this one.