The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 252 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Fair enough. I'm mostly speaking in terms of my own views rather than whatever the relevant laws and school policies are in practice. It's also quite likely that my view is heavily influenced by my own anecdotal experiences and those of my family and friends, all of which are from low-crime settings and most of which are from rural settings to boot. I saw many fights in school, but none that didn't end with a teacher, janitor, coach, bus driver or whoever stepping in and pulling the kids apart. I'm sure things would be different in an urban and/or high-crime district.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
DFK! wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
If someone, like Arathin, wants to be "**** the consequences" that's fine, but I don't blame him (the driver) for not wanting to and he shouldn't be held legally liable for not doing so in light of school policy.


To be honest, the consequences of not intervening are far worse.


For the kid, not for you.


No, for me. I think I would have a hard time coming to terms with my cowardice and waste of space.

(To reiterate, I'm not judging anyone who feels it is unsafe for them physically to intervene. I would, I think - always tough to say - intervene regardless, but I can't demand that of others. I'm only referring to folks who are more concerned about their pocketbooks or being punished than a 13YO boy.)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
DFK! wrote:
First, you shouldn't have to "convince them" of that.


I don't - now. If I go around ignoring the pleas for help of children, then I would suddenly need to.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Security guard is so far out of line of the expected duties for the pay, training, and equipment of the driver as to be just "right out." Because that's basically what you're asking them to do as part of their job function.

I have the opposite view, in that I think general responsibility for the kids' safety is a core function of every school employeeadult., so watered-down versions of everything from security guard to firefighter to EMT are part of the job.


FTFY.

Sack up, people.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:53 am 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
RangerDave wrote:
Fair enough. I'm mostly speaking in terms of my own views rather than whatever the relevant laws and school policies are in practice. It's also quite likely that my view is heavily influenced by my own anecdotal experiences and those of my family and friends, all of which are from low-crime settings and most of which are from rural settings to boot. I saw many fights in school, but none that didn't end with a teacher, janitor, coach, bus driver or whoever stepping in and pulling the kids apart. I'm sure things would be different in an urban and/or high-crime district.


Fair enough. My mother and some friends did the urban school thing for quite a well.

The rural/suburban setting is changed though, and you may not recognize it. Schools don't want teachers or anybody else stopping fights unless they're the "proper" authority to do so. Schools are afraid of lawsuits. If I'm the teacher/intervener, I'm afraid of prosecution or harm to self.
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Rorinthas wrote:
If someone, like Arathin, wants to be "**** the consequences" that's fine, but I don't blame him (the driver) for not wanting to and he shouldn't be held legally liable for not doing so in light of school policy.


To be honest, the consequences of not intervening are far worse.


For the kid, not for you.


No, for me. I think I would have a hard time coming to terms with my cowardice and waste of space.

(To reiterate, I'm not judging anyone who feels it is unsafe for them physically to intervene. I would, I think - always tough to say - intervene regardless, but I can't demand that of others. I'm only referring to folks who are more concerned about their pocketbooks or being punished than a 13YO boy.)


Also "fair enough." Again, I wouldn't call it cowardice in this circumstance though.

To your point of "demand that of others," that's a very good discussion as well: for people who feel the driver should have intervened, how far does "should" go? Are we compelling action, under the views of those people, or is it a moral "should?"




Ultimately, it comes back to incentives. We have created incentives to stay a sheep, and disincentives to be a sheep dog. Personally, in such an environment, I don't think it's very "right" of me to judge others for being not helping.

And don't get me wrong, I have NO problem judging others in a myriad of circumstances. Just not this one.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:03 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
DFK! wrote:
First, you shouldn't have to "convince them" of that.


I don't - now. If I go around ignoring the pleas for help of children, then I would suddenly need to.


Let's get something straight. The bus driver did not ignore anything. He took action per his training and per what he, personally, felt was safe and right.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
DFK! wrote:
Security guard is so far out of line of the expected duties for the pay, training, and equipment of the driver as to be just "right out." Because that's basically what you're asking them to do as part of their job function.

Clearly, the only morally right way forward is to Federally mandate Bus Marshalls nation-wide. Obama can bill it as job creation, too!

And if you oppose this measure, you hate children.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:21 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
DFK! wrote:
Security guard is so far out of line of the expected duties for the pay, training, and equipment of the driver as to be just "right out." Because that's basically what you're asking them to do as part of their job function.

Clearly, the only morally right way forward is to Federally mandate Bus Marshalls nation-wide. Obama can bill it as job creation, too!

And if you oppose this measure, you hate children.

Didn't the NRA propose this after Newtown only to be shot down by Obama?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
DFK! wrote:
To your point of "demand that of others," that's a very good discussion as well: for people who feel the driver should have intervened, how far does "should" go? Are we compelling action, under the views of those people, or is it a moral "should?"


Depends on his motivation. If he cites a policy or fear of punishment/lawsuit, he's a coward and I'd tell him so.

If he says he was afraid of getting hurt, then I'd try not to judge, but ultimately, I'll either agree with him (5'3" pixie woman) or disagree. My opinion of him would be shaped by this, though I would likely not voice it.

If he came up with some other reason (afraid it would escalate to include more students or something), then I'd base my opinion on that.

I also want to point out that it is not/should not be illegal to be a coward and/or waste of space.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
DFK! wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
DFK! wrote:
First, you shouldn't have to "convince them" of that.


I don't - now. If I go around ignoring the pleas for help of children, then I would suddenly need to.


Let's get something straight. The bus driver did not ignore anything. He took action per his training and per what he, personally, felt was safe and right.


I don't agree with this. Not completely. Yes, he made a call on the radio. Maybe "ignore" isn't the right word, but I'm not sure the better term for a half-step above ignore.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:27 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Quote:
Police say the beating was motivated by revenge. According to police, one of the three boys allegedly tried to sell drugs to the 13-year-old victim earlier in the day. The victim told school authorities of the incident. All four students ended up on the same bus that afternoon.


Just as I suspected. Little white ****'s a snitch. He got what he deserved. Snitches get stitches.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Müs wrote:
Quote:
Police say the beating was motivated by revenge. According to police, one of the three boys allegedly tried to sell drugs to the 13-year-old victim earlier in the day. The victim told school authorities of the incident. All four students ended up on the same bus that afternoon.


Just as I suspected. Little white ****'s a snitch. He got what he deserved. Snitches get stitches.


School's getting sued.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:34 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Müs wrote:
Quote:
Police say the beating was motivated by revenge. According to police, one of the three boys allegedly tried to sell drugs to the 13-year-old victim earlier in the day. The victim told school authorities of the incident. All four students ended up on the same bus that afternoon.


Just as I suspected. Little white ****'s a snitch. He got what he deserved. Snitches get stitches.


School's getting sued.


Well yeah, that **** goes without saying. I don't know what they're getting sued for honestly. Dude woulda got beaten up anyway. Not like the school had anything to do with it.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Müs wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Müs wrote:
Quote:
Police say the beating was motivated by revenge. According to police, one of the three boys allegedly tried to sell drugs to the 13-year-old victim earlier in the day. The victim told school authorities of the incident. All four students ended up on the same bus that afternoon.


Just as I suspected. Little white ****'s a snitch. He got what he deserved. Snitches get stitches.


School's getting sued.


Well yeah, that **** goes without saying. I don't know what they're getting sued for honestly. Dude woulda got beaten up anyway. Not like the school had anything to do with it.


The school's going to be hard pressed to demonstrate they provided adequate protection for the children in their charge. KNOWN threat, no action.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:39 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
/troll mode hardcore on

But if you need to after someone three against one, you are just a little pussy who deserves the shooting or incarceration you will undoubtedly receive in the future.

/troll mode nominal on

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:41 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Müs wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Müs wrote:
Quote:
Police say the beating was motivated by revenge. According to police, one of the three boys allegedly tried to sell drugs to the 13-year-old victim earlier in the day. The victim told school authorities of the incident. All four students ended up on the same bus that afternoon.


Just as I suspected. Little white ****'s a snitch. He got what he deserved. Snitches get stitches.


School's getting sued.


Well yeah, that **** goes without saying. I don't know what they're getting sued for honestly. Dude woulda got beaten up anyway. Not like the school had anything to do with it.


The school's going to be hard pressed to demonstrate they provided adequate protection for the children in their charge. KNOWN threat, no action.


So they should have provided an armed guard for the snitch?

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:43 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Uh, no. The snitch should have been armed. THIS IS AMERICA.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:44 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Lenas wrote:
Uh, no. The snitch should have been armed. THIS IS AMERICA.

Or plead for asylum from Putin.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:55 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
They were just playing Quidditch. They were the beaters, and he was the snitch. It was all a huge misunderstanding.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:58 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Lenas wrote:
Uh, no. The snitch should have been armed. THIS IS AMERICA.


I'm all for lowering the handgun age.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:59 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
DFK! wrote:
To your point of "demand that of others," that's a very good discussion as well: for people who feel the driver should have intervened, how far does "should" go? Are we compelling action, under the views of those people, or is it a moral "should?"


Depends on his motivation. If he cites a policy or fear of punishment/lawsuit, he's a coward and I'd tell him so.

If he says he was afraid of getting hurt, then I'd try not to judge, but ultimately, I'll either agree with him (5'3" pixie woman) or disagree. My opinion of him would be shaped by this, though I would likely not voice it.

If he came up with some other reason (afraid it would escalate to include more students or something), then I'd base my opinion on that.

I also want to point out that it is not/should not be illegal to be a coward and/or waste of space.


Not sure why any of this makes you a coward or waste of space. At this point I have to believe you're intentionally trolling, or wrapping into some sort of machismo ideal. Which is demonstrably.... impractical.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:16 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Xequecal wrote:
Anyone remember the Penn state thread where I said I wouldn't help someone getting beaten to death if it would permanently end my career, and then got called the scum of the universe for like two pages straight? Yeah.


Not directly, but if I espoused such a view, I apologize.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Müs wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Müs wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Müs wrote:
Quote:
Police say the beating was motivated by revenge. According to police, one of the three boys allegedly tried to sell drugs to the 13-year-old victim earlier in the day. The victim told school authorities of the incident. All four students ended up on the same bus that afternoon.


Just as I suspected. Little white ****'s a snitch. He got what he deserved. Snitches get stitches.


School's getting sued.


Well yeah, that **** goes without saying. I don't know what they're getting sued for honestly. Dude woulda got beaten up anyway. Not like the school had anything to do with it.


The school's going to be hard pressed to demonstrate they provided adequate protection for the children in their charge. KNOWN threat, no action.


So they should have provided an armed guard for the snitch?


No, it should have been turned over to police. Or the kid's parents. Or something. Allowing them to all get on the same bus immediately afterward is pretty dumb. A little common sense goes a long way.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
DFK! wrote:
Not sure why any of this makes you a coward or waste of space. At this point I have to believe you're intentionally trolling, or wrapping into some sort of machismo ideal. Which is demonstrably.... impractical.


What are you talking about? Protecting/helping children, or otherwise helpless people, is pretty much the number 1 responsibility of any adult in a society. Refusing to perform the most basic of tasks diminishes a man's societal worth pretty dramatically IMO. Waste of space? Maybe not completely, but other responsibilities are pretty minor in comparison.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:17 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
^So being a member of society means that I am required to risk my livelihood, life and health for everyone else in society? Interesting.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 252 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 316 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group