The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:24 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:29 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Amanar wrote:
You're looking way too closely at things. All the "socialist" nations of Western Europe are still highly individualistic. Rationalism is still a huge influence, even among religious people in the US. Freedom of speech doesn't have to be absolute to be a part of our political philosophy. And this idea that western philosophy is dead is just absurd.

Anyway, if you want to argue that the US has as much in common with China and Russia than with say, Germany and France, go ahead. But if you just don't like my random examples of what I consider "western philosophy," then you can just assume for my argument that by "western philosophy" I mean everything that we (Canada and the US) have in common with Western Europe.


You shouldn't assume that China and Russia have that much in common.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:31 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Talya wrote:
Amanar wrote:
Freedom of speech doesn't have to be absolute to be a part of our political philosophy.


There's nothing said about "absolute" in what I said.

In Canada and the USA you have free speech as long as the government doesn't dislike what you say enough to declare it criminal. Julian Assange has been hunted on various charges since wikileaks, and he didn't break any laws while doing it. Furthermore, he is not an American nor was he ever on American soil. Then there's various aspects of copyright and other ridiculous laws -- "Freedom of Speech" is dead.


Yes he did. He was a government employee, and what he did is illegal for a government employee to do. He gave up freedom of speech in that regardwhen he signed up. Furthermore, your desire for free movies does not make freedom of speech dead.

Edit: that was Edward Snowden, not Julian Assange. It's irrelevant whether Assange committed any crimes though; he's a foreign target as an intelligence thread.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Last edited by Diamondeye on Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:53 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Müs wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
This invasion is definitely strange. Both sides clearly know how quickly things could go to hell, and are too close to one another to really be ready to kill the other.

It's like if Texas invaded Oklahoma.


Nah, its more like if Texas invaded Mexico. Texas and OK are too ideologically close to invade each other.


Texas and Mexico are business partners, someone needs to keep the drug war afloat.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:07 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Hey DE: How do Texans feel about Oklahomans?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 8:15 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Diamondeye wrote:

Yes he did. He was a government employee, and what he did is illegal for a government employee to do. He gave up freedom of speech in that regardwhen he signed up.


Julian Assange was never a government employee. His informant Bradley Manning was, but we're not talking about his informant.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Talya wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:

Yes he did. He was a government employee, and what he did is illegal for a government employee to do. He gave up freedom of speech in that regardwhen he signed up.


Julian Assange was never a government employee. His informant Bradley Manning was, but we're not talking about his informant.


Sorry, you're right. I was thinking of Edward Snowden.

Julian Assange, however, is a foriegn national and if he gets pursued as an enemy of our country, it's up to his own country to defend him, if they want to. If they can't.. tough ****. Much like it's tough **** for Ukraine.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:26 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Lenas wrote:
Müs wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
This invasion is definitely strange. Both sides clearly know how quickly things could go to hell, and are too close to one another to really be ready to kill the other.

It's like if Texas invaded Oklahoma.


Nah, its more like if Texas invaded Mexico. Texas and OK are too ideologically close to invade each other.


Texas and Mexico are business partners, someone needs to keep the drug war afloat.


Yeah, because the drug war is definitely good business for Texas and Mexico. :roll:

Quote:
Hey DE: How do Texans feel about Oklahomans?


Oklahoma is to Texas what Canada is to the US: Similar but with a lot less people, and in both cases those of us at the couthern tip don't concern ourselves much with it.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Müs wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
This invasion is definitely strange. Both sides clearly know how quickly things could go to hell, and are too close to one another to really be ready to kill the other.

It's like if Texas invaded Oklahoma.


Nah, its more like if Texas invaded Mexico. Texas and OK are too ideologically close to invade each other.


Like Russian and Crimea. That was kind of my point.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:05 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Image

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 11:56 am 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 1:19 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Diamondeye wrote:
Yeah, because the drug war is definitely good business for Texas and Mexico.


Yes, that's what I was getting at. Mexican cartels continue to make ungodly amounts of money selling a harmless drug while we keep putting non-violent offenders into jails run by guard unions and profits.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 1:50 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Harmless? /facepalm

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:34 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Lenas wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Yeah, because the drug war is definitely good business for Texas and Mexico.


Yes, that's what I was getting at. Mexican cartels continue to make ungodly amounts of money selling a harmless drug while we keep putting non-violent offenders into jails run by guard unions and profits.


If we want to completely distort the issues, sure.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:43 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Hopwin wrote:
Harmless? /facepalm


Most studies seem to indicate that, yes.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:44 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Hopwin wrote:
Harmless? /facepalm


Yes. Weed is relatively harmless.

Meth, Coke, and Heroin on the other hand... Not so much.

The drug cartels make most of their money from weed though.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:53 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Lenas wrote:
Hopwin wrote:
Harmless? /facepalm


Most studies seem to indicate that, yes.

Which?

Quote:
A number of studies have linked chronic marijuana use and mental illness. High doses of marijuana can produce a temporary psychotic reaction (involving hallucinations and paranoia) in some users, and using marijuana can worsen the course of illness in patients with schizophrenia. A series of large studies following users across time also showed a link between marijuana use and later development of psychosis. This relationship was influenced by genetic variables as well as the amount of drug used, drug potency, and the age at which it was first taken—those who start young are at increased risk for later problems.

Associations have also been found between marijuana use and other mental health problems, such as depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts among adolescents, and personality disturbances, including a lack of motivation to engage in typically rewarding activities. More research is still needed to confirm and better understand these linkages.

Marijuana use during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of neurobehavioral problems in babies. Because THC and other compounds in marijuana mimic the body’s own endocannabinoid chemicals, marijuana use by pregnant mothers may alter the developing endocannabinoid system in the brain of the fetus. Consequences for the child may include problems with attention, memory, and problem solving.

Additionally, because it seriously impairs judgment and motor coordination, marijuana contributes to risk of injury or death while driving a car. A recent analysis of data from several studies found that marijuana use more than doubles a driver’s risk of being in an accident. The combination of marijuana and alcohol is worse than either substance alone with respect to driving impairment.

Research shows marijuana may cause problems in daily life or make a person's existing problems worse. Heavy marijuana users generally report lower life satisfaction, poorer mental and physical health, more relationship problems, and less academic and career success compared to non-marijuana-using peers. For example, marijuana use is associated with a higher likelihood of dropping out of school. Several studies also associate workers' marijuana smoking with increased absences, tardiness, accidents, workers' compensation claims, and job turnover.

http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/d ... /marijuana

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:08 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
First I'll say that I don't think that referencing a government website is going to give you a very fair or balanced outlook. Secondly I'd point out that the majority of those claims are not qualified by any citation or proof of research. The wording of many of those claims are deliberately misleading.

My anecdotal evidence is that I've been a daily "user" for years and I've never been in better physical shape, my career is stable / on an upward trajectory and my personal relationships including a happy marriage are just fine.

Some links:
• No one has ever died of a marijuana overdose, it's physically impossible to inhale/ingest enough (1,500lbs within 15 minutes - source) (aside: LD50 of salt is 7-10oz)
• It has legitimate medical use and is irrefutably safer than other acceptable vices (tobacco, alcohol) when considering recreational use

• Regarding driving:
Quote:
There was a clear relationship between alcohol and culpability. … In contrast, there was no significant increase in culpability for cannabinoids alone. While a relatively large number of injured drivers tested positive for cannabinoids, culpability rates were no higher than those for the drug free group. This is consistent with other findings.

Patients testing positive for illicit drugs (marijuana, opiates, and cocaine), in the absence of alcohol, were in crashes very similar to those of patients with neither alcohol nor drugs. When other relevant variables were considered, these drugs were not associated with more severe crashes or greater injury.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:16 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Lenas wrote:
First I'll say that I don't think that referencing a government website is going to give you a very fair or balanced outlook. Secondly I'd point out that the majority of those claims are not qualified by any citation or proof of research. The wording of many of those claims are deliberately misleading.


Hilarious, given that pro-marijuana sites and information are at least as guilty in the other direction. I haven't known the NIH to deliberately publish false information.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:22 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
At least all of the data is cited and backed up. I'm sure I can find more reputable sources but I'm at work so I don't have much time for sleuthing. The retarded classification of being a schedule one narcotic makes studying marijuana much more difficult than it should be.

The weedpress website talking about the LD50 is from a judge, the second link is from CNN and the third link is from an obviously biased source but I didn't quote any opinion text, just the reported findings.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:26 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Lenas wrote:
The retarded classification of being a schedule one narcotic makes studying marijuana much more difficult than it should be.

On that we completely agree.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:28 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Lenas wrote:
It has legitimate medical use






and in my non-medical opinion is irrefutably safer than other acceptable vices (tobacco, alcohol) when considering recreational use

FTFY

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:31 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
If you're going to do **** like that you could at least take a few minutes to pretend like you can actually back up your ... "statement" with a link or two.

• Alcohol has an easily attainable toxicity level and many people die every year from overdose.
• Tobacco is responsible for over 480,000 deaths per year, many of which are types of cancer.
• Marijuana cannot be overdosed and has been linked in many studies to cancer remission.

I think it's safe to say which of the three is the least dangerous. Objectively.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:43 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
If you believe pot is dangerous you haven't looked at the data.

It really is that simple.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
On the other end of the scale of drug users from Lenas, is this asshat, who was high when he crossed a centerline and killed a pregnant woman.

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 4:04 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
And probably on other drugs. Or alcohol. Or ignorance.

People drive drunk all the time, and yet, alcohol is still legal and has far fewer redeeming qualities.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 230 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group