The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 4:02 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Our stupid Government.
PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:01 am 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
Not directed at any party or political ideology this time. Just a comment on how stupid the Government model is.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12 ... net-error/

Quote:
WASHINGTON - The federal government improperly posted an internal guide to its airport passenger screening procedures on the Internet in a way that could offer insight into how to sidestep security.

The document outlines who is exempt from certain additional screening measures, including members of the U.S. armed forces, governors and lieutenant governors, the mayor of Washington, D.C., and their immediate families.

It offers examples of identification documents that screeners accept, including congressional, federal air marshal and CIA ID cards; and it explains that diplomatic pouches and certain foreign dignitaries with law enforcement escorts are not subjected to any screening at all. It said certain methods of verifying identification documents aren't used on all travelers during peak travel crushes.


Quote:
According to the blog, TSA posted a redacted version of the document but did not delete the sensitive information from the file. Instead of removing the text, the government covered it up with a black box. But the text was still embedded in the document and could be uncovered.


With these as our protectors I am afraid.

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:29 am 
Offline
Bru's Sweetie

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:04 am
Posts: 2675
Location: San Jose, CA
Uncle Fester wrote:
With these as our protectors I am afraid.


As am I!!

_________________
"Said I never had much use for one, never said I didn't know how to use one!"~ Matthew Quigley

"nothing like a little meow in bed at night" ~ Bruskey

"I gotta float my stick same as you" Hondo Lane

"Fill your hand you son of a *****!"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 3:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Anyone with an IQ over 85 knows airport security is useless for stopping terrorist attacks. It has some value in that it can stop the really crazy or stupid people from just putting a shotgun in their carry-on and going to town with it, but it's not going to do jack **** to determined terrorists. Remember that the 9/11 planes were hijacked using only materials that were perfectly legal to bring on board. Then you had the shoe bomber, the bojinka plot, and that UK plot, all of which would have walked right through security no problem. You think the terrorists don't already know another way to walk right through, given this history?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:42 am 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
Xequecal wrote:
Anyone with an IQ over 85 knows airport security is useless for stopping terrorist attacks. It has some value in that it can stop the really crazy or stupid people from just putting a shotgun in their carry-on and going to town with it, but it's not going to do jack **** to determined terrorists. Remember that the 9/11 planes were hijacked using only materials that were perfectly legal to bring on board. Then you had the shoe bomber, the bojinka plot, and that UK plot, all of which would have walked right through security no problem. You think the terrorists don't already know another way to walk right through, given this history?


So we should make it easier for said mundane crazies to bypass security because smart criminals can do so regardless? Brilliant!

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:53 am 
Offline
Mountain Man
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 3374
In most cases, Rafael, the mundane crazies were already probably going to be stopped by the measures that were in place prior to 9/11. I think what Xeq is suggesting is that the huge hassles we have to go through now are just a palliative, and an expensive one, at that.

_________________
This cold and dark tormented hell
Is all I`ll ever know
So when you get to heaven
May the devil be the judge


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 11:05 am
Posts: 1111
Location: Phoenix
In the over 8 years since 9/11, has any airplane been hijacked? I can't think of any, but it is possible I'm forgetting.

I don't think hijacking an airplane is something likely to happen successfully much at all. Before 9/11 the response ingrained into everyone during a hijacked plane scenario was "Don't do anything, stay calm, and let the authorities handle it." When 9/11 occured, that completely changed. Now people on the plane are likely to go all out to prevent a hijacking, even risking their own lives.

Edit: The idea of someone hijacking an airplane using box cutters, in a post-9/11 world, is preposterous.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:40 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Aethien wrote:
In most cases, Rafael, the mundane crazies were already probably going to be stopped by the measures that were in place prior to 9/11. I think what Xeq is suggesting is that the huge hassles we have to go through now are just a palliative, and an expensive one, at that.


What huge hassels? As annoying as taking your shoes off for the metal detector is, it really isn't that big of an imposition.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:59 am 
Offline
God of the IRC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 3041
Location: The United States of DESU
All coats and jackets must be removed and placed in in a bin on the conveyor belt.
All shoes must be removed and placed in a bin on the conveyor belt.
Laptops must be removed from their bag and placed in a separate bin on the conveyor belt.
No liquid in quantities greater than 10oz.
All liquids must fit into a 1 quart storage bag.
This storage bag must be removed from your carry-on and placed in a bin on the conveyor belt.
Only people with a valid boarding pass may pass security.

Now, if you manage to get through the metal detector and the xray without being randomly selected for a more thorough screening, then you get to put your shoes back on, put your coat back on, put your liquid bag back in your suitcase, put your laptop back in your laptop bag, and THEN you can be on your way.

Yeah, no hassle at all...

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:01 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Mookhow wrote:
All coats and jackets must be removed and placed in in a bin on the conveyor belt.
All shoes must be removed and placed in a bin on the conveyor belt.
Laptops must be removed from their bag and placed in a separate bin on the conveyor belt.
No liquid in quantities greater than 10oz.
All liquids must fit into a 1 quart storage bag.
This storage bag must be removed from your carry-on and placed in a bin on the conveyor belt.
Only people with a valid boarding pass may pass security.

Now, if you manage to get through the metal detector and the xray without being randomly selected for a more thorough screening, then you get to put your shoes back on, put your coat back on, put your liquid bag back in your suitcase, put your laptop back in your laptop bag, and THEN you can be on your way.

Yeah, no hassle at all...


Yeah, because clearly someone claimed there was no hassle at all.

None of that is anything more than an inconvenience, and as for "managing" to get through without additional screening, that's what about 99% of the people "manage" to do. I haven't ever even seen anyone pulled aside for more screening, much less been selected and I've flown quite a bit since 9/11. It's not a regular thing you can expect, and even then, how are they really holding you up? You might have to drink one less beer at the terminal bar before you get on the plane.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:09 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Funny thing about that "inconvenience" ...

A company who's name I'm not at liberty to mention now charters flights for all of its business travels because of that "inconvenience." This includes small charter aircraft (Piper Malibu for example) and executive aircraft (King Air 3xx for example) and small jets (Cessna Citation). Hiring a pilot and chartering an aircraft for a single passenger is pretty expensive, generally more than the cost of a plane ticket. The 4 hours of airport time lost to security measures, however, means they save money--to the tune 1.3 billion dollars last year.

And the rest of our research indicates that private aviation would be flourishing and saving the country money, provided our President and Congress hadn't ***** about GM and Chrysler using the cheaper alternative to get their people to Washington last Spring.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:13 am 
Offline
God of the IRC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 3041
Location: The United States of DESU
I apologize for my vagueness. When I said "no hassle at all", what I was trying to say sarcastically is that the new procedure is a HUGE hassle to me, because not only do I have to remove my coat, hat, shoes, laptop, and liquids, but afterwards I have to put them all back. This is in addition to the standard keys, change, phone, etc that I've always had to deal with. Not only do I have extra hassle, I also have to wait while everybody else does the same thing.

You may not consider it a big hassle, but not everybody agrees with you.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:54 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Khross wrote:
Funny thing about that "inconvenience" ...

A company who's name I'm not at liberty to mention now charters flights for all of its business travels because of that "inconvenience." This includes small charter aircraft (Piper Malibu for example) and executive aircraft (King Air 3xx for example) and small jets (Cessna Citation). Hiring a pilot and chartering an aircraft for a single passenger is pretty expensive, generally more than the cost of a plane ticket. The 4 hours of airport time lost to security measures, however, means they save money--to the tune 1.3 billion dollars last year.

And the rest of our research indicates that private aviation would be flourishing and saving the country money, provided our President and Congress hadn't ***** about GM and Chrysler using the cheaper alternative to get their people to Washington last Spring.


4 hours of lost airport time? Is that per passanger per airport visit (i.e. 8 hours for a round trip?)

Where are these people going to the airport? I've never seen anything approaching a 4 hour security delay.

Mookhow wrote:
I apologize for my vagueness. When I said "no hassle at all", what I was trying to say sarcastically is that the new procedure is a HUGE hassle to me, because not only do I have to remove my coat, hat, shoes, laptop, and liquids, but afterwards I have to put them all back. This is in addition to the standard keys, change, phone, etc that I've always had to deal with. Not only do I have extra hassle, I also have to wait while everybody else does the same thing.

You may not consider it a big hassle, but not everybody agrees with you.


Obviously not everyone agrees. That, however, doesn't matter much since it's essentially an appeal to popularity.

The fact of the matter is that yes, airport security measures are an annoyance, but that's all they are. It's hardly some travesty that they are in place.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
The difference in my security checkpoint preparations before and after 9/11 is at least 5 minutes. Shoes, coat, disassembling and reassembling luggage for laptop and liquids, etc. all slow down the line. And that 5 minutes compounds, as other people have to wait for it, then do their own 5 minutes, etc.

This is why you have lines at the security checkpoints, now. And at larger airports, they can be very long lines, indeed.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:14 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Diamondeye:

It's 4 hours round trip, since even small commuter hubs now require sequestered passengers at least 90 minutes in advance of boarding.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:46 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Khross wrote:
Diamondeye:

It's 4 hours round trip, since even small commuter hubs now require sequestered passengers at least 90 minutes in advance of boarding.


They require nothing of the sort. Any timeline like that is purely a recommendation to the passanger so that they don't miss their flight if for some reason there is a delay.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:50 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Diamondeye wrote:
Khross wrote:
Diamondeye:

It's 4 hours round trip, since even small commuter hubs now require sequestered passengers at least 90 minutes in advance of boarding.


They require nothing of the sort. Any timeline like that is purely a recommendation to the passanger so that they don't miss their flight if for some reason there is a delay.
Yes, actually, they do. My last four flights have REQUIRED me to be in the post-security part of the airport 90 minutes before boarding. I'll try to remember to scan the notices from Hartsfield and the two commuter hubs I fly out of regularly.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:16 am 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
The problem with airport security is the passgengers. It's also the problem with boarding the planes, deboarding etc. People are stupid, slow, and move in ineffecient sequences. Maybe I have an unfair advantage since I go through more security than a TSA checkpoint 3-4 times a day or more, but even before that, I knew how to get all my **** on and off the conveyor quickly and effeciently.

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:07 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Khross wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
Khross wrote:
Diamondeye:

It's 4 hours round trip, since even small commuter hubs now require sequestered passengers at least 90 minutes in advance of boarding.


They require nothing of the sort. Any timeline like that is purely a recommendation to the passanger so that they don't miss their flight if for some reason there is a delay.
Yes, actually, they do. My last four flights have REQUIRED me to be in the post-security part of the airport 90 minutes before boarding. I'll try to remember to scan the notices from Hartsfield and the two commuter hubs I fly out of regularly.


I find that very odd. I've flown through airports of varying sizes in Florida, Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin within the last year or so. No requirement whatsoever for being through security a certain amount of time beforehand was evident; in fact I was through only 5 minutes before scheduled time for one flight in Florida and no problem appeared.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
There is a local private company here that charges a flat fee for the pilot and then an hourly fee for actual flight time.

Overall, depending on the distance, it is a little bit more expensive than commercial flight, but as a trade off, you can show up at the airport and immediately board the plane, when you land the company has a rental car waiting for your use. The plane waits (at no cost as long as it is within a few hours) for you to return and you can board the plane and leave.

It saves at least 1 hour on each side of the trip over commercial flight, plus the random amount of time between when the meeting/site visit ends and the next scheduled commercial flight (potentially not an insignificant amount of time).

Additionally, the costs are per plane/per hour, not per passenger, so the direct savings for 2 or more people compared to commercial tickets is better, not including time savings.

Plus, you can effectively work on the private plane, unless most commercial, unless you pay for better seating.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Khross wrote:
And the rest of our research indicates that private aviation would be flourishing and saving the country money, provided our President and Congress hadn't ***** about GM and Chrysler using the cheaper alternative to get their people to Washington last Spring.


Yeah, most liberals are aware this costs more. If they had their way these CEOs would have been forced to endure this and many other inconveniences for no pay, as a "public service" for "helping ruin the economy."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:31 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
It's the same way with any kind of securty. All you can do is patch the holes you know about and increase the risk vis reward ration for any intruder, or as the old saying goes keep honest people honest.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:44 pm 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
I find it funny that any military charter flight I'm on requires us to pass security check points. Aren't we the front line of Homeland Security? I'm carrying an M16 with me...

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:46 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Xequecal wrote:
Khross wrote:
And the rest of our research indicates that private aviation would be flourishing and saving the country money, provided our President and Congress hadn't ***** about GM and Chrysler using the cheaper alternative to get their people to Washington last Spring.


Yeah, most liberals are aware this costs more. If they had their way these CEOs would have been forced to endure this and many other inconveniences for no pay, as a "public service" for "helping ruin the economy."


Technically it would have been for very little pay, and if they'd decided to quit, no one could have stopped them.

Quote:
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.


I trust evryone can figure out where that's from without a link.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 1:53 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
necrowombicon?

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 167 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group