The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:28 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 7:19 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
I would have thought that would be pages long by now.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 7:42 am 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Why don't you post your take on it? All the news stories I've seen make him sound like a total nutter who has been mooching on Federal Lands for 20+ years after several reasonable attempts to get him to stop.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 7:56 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Haven't really looked into the details all that much so can't really say. I just figured this would have been a hot button issue for the forum.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:58 am 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
I'm more surprised we haven't brought up Heartbleed yet.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:42 am 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
TheRiov wrote:
I'm more surprised we haven't brought up Heartbleed yet.


Don't worry, The Glade is immune.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:09 pm 
Offline
God of the IRC
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 3041
Location: The United States of DESU
Lenas wrote:
TheRiov wrote:
I'm more surprised we haven't brought up Heartbleed yet.


Don't worry, The Glade is immune.


We don't even use SSL.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:32 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Hopwin wrote:
Why don't you post your take on it? All the news stories I've seen make him sound like a total nutter who has been mooching on Federal Lands for 20+ years after several reasonable attempts to get him to stop.


He's a rancher that has been in the same area since the late 1800's. He has valid claims to the land, and the BLM is taking his cattle away because of tortoises that have been euthanized or something. Also the BLM thinks he owes them money for the land his family has owned for over a hundred years.

Its seriously **** up.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:34 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Yeah the act on which the BLM claim to exercise authoity over was passed in 1934 about 70 years after his family started ranching on the land.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:38 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Elmarnieh wrote:
Yeah the act on which the BLM claim to exercise authoity over was passed in 1934 about 70 years after his family started ranching on the land.

The argument of "we were here first" didn't work too well for Native American's either. He also makes no claim to own the land, just that he should be allowed to let his cattle eat everything off of it because they've been doing it for a long time.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:45 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
From his own mouth (bold):

Quote:
In removing Bundy's livestock from public lands, the park service and land bureau are carrying out two U.S. District Court orders from two different judges.

"Cattle have been grazing in trespass on public lands in Southern Nevada for more than two decades," the National Park Service said. "The BLM and NPS have made repeated attempts to resolve this matter administratively and judicially. Impoundment of cattle illegally grazing on public lands is an option of last resort."

Added the BLM: "Mr. Bundy has also failed to comply with multiple court orders to remove his cattle from the federal lands and to end the illegal trespass."

The bureau does allow grazing on federal lands -- it administers 18,000 grazing permits and leases on 157 million acres across the country, the agency said.

Bundy's dispute with the government began about 1993 when the bureau changed grazing rules for the 600,000-acre Gold Butte area to protect an endangered desert tortoise, KLAS reported.

Bundy refused to abide by the changes and stopped paying his grazing fees to the federal bureau, which he contends is infringing on state rights. His family has been ranching since the 1800s, before the U.S. Department of Interior was created and endangered species became a federal issue, he said in an interview with KLAS.

"My forefathers have been up and down the Virgin Valley ever since 1877. All these rights I claim have been created through pre-emptive rights and beneficial use of the forage and the water. I have been here longer. My rights are before the BLM even existed," Bundy told the station.

"With all these rangers and all this force that is out here, they are only after one man right now. They are after Cliven Bundy. Whether they want to incarcerate me or whether they want to shoot me in the back, they are after me. But that is not all that is at stake here. Your liberty and freedom is at stake," he continued.

And Bundy sees it as a state issue.

"The federal government has seized Nevada's sovereignty ... they have seized Nevada's laws and our public land. We have no access to our public land and that is only a little bit of it," he said.


Also his group kicked a police dog so **** them.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:57 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Quote:
Bundy's dispute with the government began about 1993 when the bureau changed grazing rules for the 600,000-acre Gold Butte area to protect an endangered desert tortoise, KLAS reported.


Those tortoises have since been removed.

As for kicking the police dog... They shouldn't have been in a standoff over this. There shouldn't have been a police dog there. Its ridiculous the amount of force the BLM has brought forth.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:10 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Müs wrote:
Quote:
Bundy's dispute with the government began about 1993 when the bureau changed grazing rules for the 600,000-acre Gold Butte area to protect an endangered desert tortoise, KLAS reported.


Those tortoises have since been removed.

As for kicking the police dog... They shouldn't have been in a standoff over this. There shouldn't have been a police dog there. Its ridiculous the amount of force the BLM has brought forth.

You live in Nevada so you probably have better information than the national news. So what force has the BLM brought down upon these people exactly that is not being reported in the news?

I'd say after twenty years of attempts to get him to peacefully comply with two separate court rulings their confiscation of his cattle is justified. All the violence and force that I have seen reported has been on the part of the Bundys and their whackadoo supporters who are ramming civilian vehicles with ATVs, vandalizing BLM vehicles and kicking police dogs.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:26 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
There's a lot of FUD going around on this.

Check this, take with grain of salt.

Quote:
"By SHIREE BUNDY COX: I have had people ask me to explain my dad's stance on this BLM fight.
Here it is in as simple of terms as I can explain it. There is so much to it, but here it s in a nut shell.
My great grandpa bought the rights to the Bunkerville allotment back in 1887 around there. Then he sold them to my grandpa who then turned them over to my dad in 1972.
These men bought and paid for their rights to the range and also built waters, fences and roads to assure the servival of their cattle, all with their own money, not with tax dollars.
These rights to the land use is called preemptive rights.
Some where down the line, to keep the cows from over grazing, came the bureau of land management. They were supposed to assist the ranchers in the management of their ranges while the ranchers paid a yearly allotment which was to be use to pay the BLM wages and to help with repaires and improvements of the ranches.
My dad did pay his grazing fees for years to the BLM until they were no longer using his fees to help him and to improve.
Instead they began using these money's against the ranchers.
They bought all the rest of the ranchers in the area out with they're own grazing fees.
When they offered to buy my dad out for a penence he said no thanks and then fired them because they weren't doing their job.
He quit paying the BLM but, tried giving his grazing fees to the county, which they turned down.
So my dad just went on running his ranch and making his own improvements with his own equipment and his own money, not taxes.
In essence the BLM was managing my dad out of business.
Well when buying him out didn't work, they used the indangered species card.
You've already heard about the desert tortis.
Well that didn't work either, so then began the threats and the court orders, which my dad has proven to be unlawful for all these years.
Now their desperate.
It's come down to buying the brand inspector off and threatening the County Sheriff.
Everything their doing at this point is illegal and totally against the constitution of the United States of America.
Now you may be saying," how sad, but what does this have to do with me?" Well, I'll tell you.
They will get rid of Cliven Bundy, the last man standing on the Bunkerville allotment and then they will close all the roads so no one can ever go on it again.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:43 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
At the risk of coming across a bigger flaming dickhole than I am (seriously). Perhaps someone who cannot grasp the basics of the English language isn't the most credible source for Constitutional law...

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:16 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Constitutionality aside, the BLM is being awfully fascist about it.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Quote:
My dad did pay his grazing fees for years to the BLM until they were no longer using his fees to help him and to improve.


He quit paying the grazing fees. Seems his problem is self-inflicted.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:33 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Its likely about money.
http://www.shalereporter.com/industry/a ... 0.facebook

Actually, Elko County is in NE NV, I thought Bundy was more north than it is. Its actually down here near Mesquite. Mea Culpa.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:47 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Müs wrote:
Its likely about money.
http://www.shalereporter.com/industry/a ... 0.facebook

Actually, Elko County is in NE NV, I thought Bundy was more north than it is. Its actually down here near Mesquite. Mea Culpa.

They made $1.27M off the sales and Bundy owes grazing fees of $1M. I'd agree it's about money.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 10:53 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Taskiss wrote:
Quote:
My dad did pay his grazing fees for years to the BLM until they were no longer using his fees to help him and to improve.


He quit paying the grazing fees. Seems his problem is self-inflicted.


Indeed. Seems this goes in this thread as well:
Image[/quote]

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:39 am
Posts: 452
Eh, the situation sounds pretty complicated so it's hard to say who's in the right here.

However, working on and maintaining a piece of land is the essence of land ownership, in my opinion. If you "own" a huge tract of land and you do absolutely nothing on it for a hundred years, I don't think you have any moral claim for charging others rent to use that land. I know that's probably not how the laws/courts see things though.

Consider that the federal government owns 83% of the land in Nevada. Does that make it okay for them to impose whatever arbitrary restrictions they want on people using that land? Can they just close off 83% of the state of Nevada to everyone, without any input from the residents of that state?

Now, maybe the restrictions they want to impose here aren't arbitrary and there is good reason for them. Maybe the Bundys aren't responsible stewards of the land they claim to be managing. Maybe they're doing environmental damage or destroying precious natural resources. I don't know, I'm open to such arguments. But I don't buy that it's a clear case of them "mooching off of public lands" and "disobeying the law."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 11:49 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
The residents certainly do have a say through their representatives and state government. Furthermore, "not doing anything with it" is a form of conservation and management. If his family had owned outright the land in question for 100 years and someone squatting on it suddenly got mad that he started charging rent, no oe would have any confusion. Rules change from time to time.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:39 am
Posts: 452
How does their state government have any control over what a federal agency does with their federally owned land? That's not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely curious if there is anything they could do through their state or local government to deal with this situation.

As for your statement about squatters... we have squatters rights for exactly that kind of situation.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:40 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Amanar are you suggesting it'd be alright for me to graze my cattle in Arlington? Or is the fact that someone cuts the grass there the line where stewardship comes into play?

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:39 am
Posts: 452
No, that's not what I'm suggesting at all. There's probably a hundred good reasons to not allow people to graze their cattle on federal lands in Arlington, I don't think I need to go into them.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 1:16 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Amanar wrote:
How does their state government have any control over what a federal agency does with their federally owned land? That's not a rhetorical question, I'm genuinely curious if there is anything they could do through their state or local government to deal with this situation.

As for your statement about squatters... we have squatters rights for exactly that kind of situation.

Its still a part of the state of Nevada, so yes the state government definitely has input. As cor squatters rights, yez we have them. So what? They aren't an unlimited right of squatters to remain on anywhdere indefinitely and for free.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 233 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group