The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:50 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
http://www.wfaa.com/news/Neighborhood-h ... =1&clmob=y
Quote:
ROWLETT - A maze created by a Rowlett homeowner has been a Halloween treat for hundreds of children for years.

Byran Norfolk took weeks to plan out the haunted maze for this year and a week to actually build it, but no children will actually get a chance to give it a go this Halloween weekend.

The problem, according to the homeowner, was an unhappy neighbor who has been called a "Halloween Grinch." Due to the neighbor's complaints, the maze was canceled.

Since 2001, Norfolk has spent the week before Halloween setting up the maze.

“We have kids go through here three, four, five times," Norfolk said.

The winding hallways take thrill-seekers through a series of makeshift rooms filled with clowns, monsters and a chainsaw-toting zombie.

Thursday, Norfolk began disassembling the maze after a single neighbor complained to the City of Rowlett Code Enforcement Department about sidewalks being blocked. A sign in front of Norfolk's house reads, “Due to complaining neighbor, the 9th annual haunted maze has been canceled."

Rowlett officials told Norfolk any sidewalk obstruction violates the law. In this case, children would be forced to take a detour into the street to get by the maze.

“It’s kind of sad that we live in a country where one person can shut down the fun of hundreds of kids," said Rob Morgan, a neighbor.

Morgan’s wife, Angela, agreed.

“There's going to be a lot of disappointed people this year," she said.

Norfolk said since the haunted maze tradition began almost a decade ago, this is the first time anyone has ever complained.

“Be a neighbor," he said. "Come up to the front door to say, 'Hey, you guys are blocking the sidewalk,'" he said. "Don't call the police."

Rowlett code enforcers told Norfolk the maze would be fine as long as he moved it off the sidewalk. But, the creator of the popular neighborhood attraction said he would have to redesign the entire structure, an impossible task just three days before Halloween.

WFAA tried to find the neighbor who complained, but Rowlett officials said whoever called chose to remain anonymous.


What a jerk!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:30 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Boo Hoo the evil local government is enforcing the law. What's the world coming to?

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 12:50 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Doesn't change the fact that the guy complaining is a jerk.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Rorinthas wrote:
Boo Hoo the evil local government is enforcing the law. What's the world coming to?


Just because it's the law doesn't mean it should always be enforced. The law isn't perfect. Ever hear of warnings given instead of speeding tickets?

The neighbor didn't have to complain. And the town could have told the maze owner, "Please keep it off the sidewalk next year."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:38 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Rorinthas wrote:
Boo Hoo the evil local government is enforcing the law. What's the world coming to?


Apparently more non-neighborly neighbors and more evil in local government and crappy laws that emphasize the problem with "public property".

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
It's much more likely that the neighbor didn't want a crapload of screaming kids around every night and the fact that it was over the sidewalk was the leverage point he could use to get it shut down.

If it was the 9th year the guy was doing it, I'm guessing that he was tired of the noise, etc.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:20 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
This is a great example of why over-regulation is bad.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Well, strictly speaking, some guys entertainment activity was spilling over on public property and creating a nuisance.

If it were next door to me, it would depend on the level of nuisance, and if I suffered any appreciable property damage in the past I'm not so sure I'd be OK with it either.

Like anything, the answer is "it depends".

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:37 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
As far as I am concerned. Children getting hit cause they had to walk in traffic is worse.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:52 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
Elmarnieh wrote:
[..] and crappy laws that emphasize the problem with "public property".

I'm not sure why you've put "public property" in scare-quotes. In Texas, sidewalks are located fully within the street right-of-way, which is literally owned by the City, County, or State, depending on locale. It isn't "public property", it's just public property, period.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:55 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
The quotes are for the idea that the public can own property at all Stathol.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 2:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
And if the guys display was extending into the road?

irrational sentiment Elmo.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:11 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Ladas wrote:
And if the guys display was extending into the road?

irrational sentiment Elmo.


Foolish but same issue.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
And still an irrational sentiment on your part.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:49 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Rorinthas wrote:
As far as I am concerned. Children getting hit cause they had to walk in traffic is worse.



This statement caught my eye, but just for the words, not because I'm trying to start flinging doo doo at you Ror.

Why did the children have to walk into traffic? If they are out and about then one could assume their parents (who are responsible for them) have determined that they are capable of keeping out of a cars way all on their own. If they are kids who don't have that necessary skill to survive in todays enviorment- then the parents should be with the children to keep their genes viable. Kids are in streets outside of sanctioned crosswalks at all hours of the day in all sorts of weather, in all sorts of traffic, weather and visibility conditions yet we don't have hundreds of people picking little Sally or Bobby parts out of their mudflaps. I thoroughly reject the idea of passing laws "to protect teh childrenz". Thats the gorram parents job. Maybe if some of these #()%$# parents lost a few dependants they would either A) use birth control or B) start being freaking parents.

This I type as packs of feral urchins that live around me run unsupervised and roughshod over the area. I'd welcome a few distracted drivers through the parking lots to clear some of them out I think. Maybe set up a bag limit.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:57 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
The children had to walk into traffic because some selfish individual blocked the proper lane for foot traffic with his Holloween display.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Stop being such a dickins.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:01 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
And I'm saying that walking into the street is the choice of the individual. If your path is blocked, you make a decision on how to proceed and deal with the concequences of your decision. Take the long way across the yard, or the immediate path which may or may not be dangerous.

(just a mental exercise to see where people sit on the personal resp fence)

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Hannibal wrote:
This I type as packs of feral urchins that live around me run unsupervised and roughshod over the area. I'd welcome a few distracted drivers through the parking lots to clear some of them out I think. Maybe set up a bag limit.


Death Race 2000 Point System wrote:
Women: 10 points
Teenagers: 40 points
Race officials: 50 points
Children under 12: 70 points
Senior citizens: 100 points


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:22 am
Posts: 385
Rorinthas wrote:
The children had to walk into traffic because some selfish individual blocked the proper lane for foot traffic with his Holloween display.


Taking a step off the curb isn't "walking into traffic."

Especially on a night when crowds of children will be going door to door and crossing the street. Most of the street traffic that night probably *will* be kids.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:09 pm
Posts: 252
Rorinthas wrote:
The children had to walk into traffic because some selfish individual blocked the proper lane for foot traffic with his Holloween display.


Do you have a problem with kids crossing the street to trick-or-treat on the other side of the road? I think to be consistent, you'd have to have a problem with that.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:40 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Not necessarily. Children can cross the street at crosswalks, or at corners which are customarily accepted safe crossing points where crosswalks are not available.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:47 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
Elmarnieh wrote:
The quotes are for the idea that the public can own property at all Stathol.

So, who should own the court house building (and the land it occupies)? Or a police station? Or, for that matter, the weapons and equipment used by the army?

I know you're opposed to public roads, but I don't see why it's a ridiculous idea that the government can be granted ownership of property in general. In fact, I'd say that's pretty much a necessity for a government of any meaningful size to function.

Or maybe you take issue with a less specific sense of public property which isn't government property? As I explained above, that wouldn't apply to this case because right-of-ways are actually titled to the State of Texas or one of its sub-entities (county, city, etc.). But regardless, even this less specific sense is really just an instance of corporate ownership. I'm sure you'd agree that 3 people can come together and share in the ownership of land. So could 50 people or 1,000. We also allow for Corporate (big C) ownership, which is even more nebulous corporate (small c) ownership than a simple land trust. "The public" is just another superset of citizens, and you would have to limit their individual property rights in order to prohibit them from owning land together.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 10:31 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
Couldn't he have redesigned the maze so it wasn't on the sidewalk? He is as much responsible for the removal of the maze as the neighbor making the complaint.

And folks, Elmarnieh doesn't have viable real world solutions for the problems he brings up. He just likes to complain about what he and a few other whiners misinterpret in the Constitution. Really, why argue with him about these points.

---------------

Article 4, Section 3.

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

---------------

The second paragraph clearly states that the congress has power over property. The law is clear. Under the Property Clause above, and under the Supremacy Clause proclaiming the constitution the Supreme law of the land, the Federal government possesses the unfettered authority to manage public lands. If the Federal government did not have the right to manage territory or other property, Elm might have a case. It does, and it cedes the right to States and their subdivisions for the public good.

'All the public lands of the nation are held in trust for the people of the whole country.' United States v. Trinidad Coal & Coking Co. 137 U.S. 160, 34 L.Ed. 640, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 57.

Public land exists, the constitution says the federal government has authority over it, the supreme court says the Congress determines the use of it, and so on and so forth. Saying it does not exist is one of Elm's fantasies.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 5:26 am 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
If the sidewalk in front of someone's home is considered public property... why is the homeowner usually held responsible for taking care of that patch of sidewalk?

Not baiting, just a question I have always wondered.

I am firmly in the camp of... "If it is not my sidewalk... let the city shovel the snow off of it."

I also think... it is shitty that the guy had to cancel is decade old tradition, but he really should have kept it off of the sidewalk. I also agree that children getting hit by traffic is bad.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 247 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group