The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:11 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Does this count?
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
Does this count as racism? A Louisianna judge denied a marriage license to an interracial couple, saying that he just couldn't lay that kind of stigma on their children.

Does that constitute racism? The guys says he has lots of black friends, and he's not a racist. And yet, he denied a marriage license based on the couple's race.

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:08 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
It could be a cover for racism but if you believe his stated position its more of a fear of racism - still outside his authority.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:10 pm 
Offline
Perfect Equilibrium
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 3127
Location: Coffin Corner
What does it matter if it "counts"?

_________________
"It's real, grew up in trife life, the times of white lines
The hype vice, murderous nighttimes and knife fights invite crimes" - Nasir Jones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
Posts: 2410
I'm curious what the conservatives on the board will accept as racism. Clearly blatantly racist statements bade by commentators and other conservatives are not enough to qualify. I want to know where the line is for conservatives on the board. Is denying an interracial couple a marriage license indicative of racism? Or no?

_________________
Image

It feels like all the people who want limited government really just want government limited to Republicans.
---The Daily Show


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: South Strikes again.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:30 pm 
Offline
Too lazy for a picture

Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:40 pm
Posts: 1352
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,567 ... latestnews

Quote:
Interracial Couple Refused Marriage License in Louisiana

Thursday, October 15, 2009

* Print
* ShareThis

HAMMOND, La. — A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have.

Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.

"I'm not a racist. I just don't believe in mixing the races that way," Bardwell told the Associated Press on Thursday. "I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else."

Bardwell said he asks everyone who calls about marriage if they are a mixed race couple. If they are, he does not marry them, he said.

Bardwell said he has discussed the topic with blacks and whites, along with witnessing some interracial marriages. He came to the conclusion that most of black society does not readily accept offspring of such relationships, and neither does white society, he said.

"There is a problem with both groups accepting a child from such a marriage," Bardwell said. "I think those children suffer and I won't help put them through it."

If he did an interracial marriage for one couple, he must do the same for all, he said.

"I try to treat everyone equally," he said.

Bardwell estimates that he has refused to marry about four couples during his career, all in the past 2 1/2 years.

Beth Humphrey, 30, and 32-year-old Terence McKay, both of Hammond, say they will consult the U.S. Justice Department about filing a discrimination complaint.

Humphrey, an account manager for a marketing firm, said she and McKay, a welder, just returned to Louisiana. She plans to enroll in the University of New Orleans to pursue a masters degree in minority politics.

"That was one thing that made this so unbelievable," she said. "It's not something you expect in this day and age."

Humphrey said she called Bardwell on Oct. 6 to inquire about getting a marriage license signed. She says Bardwell's wife told her that Bardwell will not sign marriage licenses for interracial couples. Bardwell suggested the couple go to another justice of the peace in the parish who agreed to marry them.

"We are looking forward to having children," Humphrey said. "And all our friends and co-workers have been very supportive. Except for this, we're typical happy newlyweds."

"It is really astonishing and disappointing to see this come up in 2009," said American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana attorney Katie Schwartzmann. "The Supreme Court ruled as far back as 1963 that the government cannot tell people who they can and cannot marry."

The ACLU sent a letter to the Louisiana Judiciary Committee, which oversees the state justices of the peace, asking them to investigate Bardwell and recommending "the most severe sanctions available, because such blatant bigotry poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the administration of justice."

"He knew he was breaking the law, but continued to do it," Schwartzmann said.

According to the clerk of court's office, application for a marriage license must be made three days before the ceremony because there is a 72-hour waiting period. The applicants are asked if they have previously been married. If so, they must show how the marriage ended, such as divorce.

Other than that, all they need is a birth certificate and Social Security card.

The license fee is $35, and the license must be signed by a Louisiana minister, justice of the peace or judge. The original is returned to the clerk's office.

"I've been a justice of the peace for 34 years and I don't think I've mistreated anybody," Bardwell said. "I've made some mistakes, but you have too. I didn't tell this couple they couldn't get married. I just told them I wouldn't do it."

_________________
"Life isn't divided into genres. It's a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you're lucky."
— Alan Moore


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:34 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Monte beat ya to it.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:39 pm 
Offline
Asian Blonde

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 2075
Depends... does he deny ALL inter-racial marriages or just this one based specifically on 1 (or selected) race?

If it is ALL inter-racial marriages, then he's just an arsehole, if it's just this one then he's a racist.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:41 pm 
Offline
Asian Blonde

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 2075
oh wait .. haha .. I learnt to read...
Quote:
If he does an interracial marriage for one couple, he must do the same for all, he said.


He's just an un-informed arsehole.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: South Strikes again.
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:45 am
Posts: 889
I understand his reasoning, but that's not his call to make. Racist or not, he's in the wrong. IMO.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:12 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Monte wrote:
I'm curious what the conservatives on the board will accept as racism. Clearly blatantly racist statements bade by commentators and other conservatives are not enough to qualify. I want to know where the line is for conservatives on the board. Is denying an interracial couple a marriage license indicative of racism? Or no?


In and of itself, denying an interracial couple a marriage license is not racism. It does not appear to be in this case either. That still does not make it either acceptable or legal.

In order to show racism you would need to show how it favored one race over another; something I don't see in the article. That said, it is still ignorant and unacceptable.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
At least Monte has learned to curb his tendency to insult groups or demographics instead of individuals when making such remarks.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:17 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
This is racism alright: an extension of the racist, bigoted mindset behind affirmative action. Let me elaborate.

Affirmative action states that we must use racial discrimination to remove/combat racial discrimination against individuals within certain groups.

This judge is simply extending that logic: we must use racial discrimination to remove/combat racial discrimination against individuals who haven't been born yet within certain groups.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
To answer the question though, I am of the opinion that his position is racist.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
His position is clearly a reaction to the anticipated racism directed to such hypothetical offspring by others in the future. It is an inappropriate call to make on his part and falls clearly outside his duties, rights, and responsibilities as an officer of the law, but does not necessarily provide evidence one way or the other as to his own racism.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:47 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Ladas wrote:
At least Monte has learned to curb his tendency to insult groups or demographics instead of individuals when making such remarks.

Indeed. I'm impressed to learn that one Louisiana justice of the peace constitutes the political bearing of the whole of the southern United States. Why even bother holding elections for this quarter of the country when we're all of the same opinions about everything?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:52 pm 
Offline
The Game Master.
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:01 pm
Posts: 3729
FarSky wrote:
Ladas wrote:
At least Monte has learned to curb his tendency to insult groups or demographics instead of individuals when making such remarks.

Indeed. I'm impressed to learn that one Louisiana justice of the peace constitutes the political bearing of the whole of the southern United States. Why even bother holding elections for this quarter of the country when we're all of the same opinions about everything?


Interestingly, we can't even narrow you dirty southerners' political inklings down to party lines, since this particular justice's party affiliation remains undisclosed.

_________________
“The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” - Thomas Paine


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:54 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
His position is clearly a reaction to the anticipated racism directed to such hypothetical offspring by others in the future. It is an inappropriate call to make on his part and falls clearly outside his duties, rights, and responsibilities as an officer of the law, but does not necessarily provide evidence one way or the other as to his own racism.


I agree with this statement.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:56 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
DFK! wrote:
FarSky wrote:
Ladas wrote:
At least Monte has learned to curb his tendency to insult groups or demographics instead of individuals when making such remarks.

Indeed. I'm impressed to learn that one Louisiana justice of the peace constitutes the political bearing of the whole of the southern United States. Why even bother holding elections for this quarter of the country when we're all of the same opinions about everything?


Interestingly, we can't even narrow you dirty southerners' political inklings down to party lines, since this particular justice's party affiliation remains undisclosed.

Apparently, we don't have red states or blue states down here. We must be white states, then. As white as freshly-pressed sheets.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:07 am 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
sigh.

He's a racist by the way.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:30 am 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Ladas wrote:
At least Monte has learned to curb his tendency to insult groups or demographics instead of individuals when making such remarks.

FarSky wrote:
DFK! wrote:
FarSky wrote:
Indeed. I'm impressed to learn that one Louisiana justice of the peace constitutes the political bearing of the whole of the southern United States. Why even bother holding elections for this quarter of the country when we're all of the same opinions about everything?


Interestingly, we can't even narrow you dirty southerners' political inklings down to party lines, since this particular justice's party affiliation remains undisclosed.

Apparently, we don't have red states or blue states down here. We must be white states, then. As white as freshly-pressed sheets.

Oh come on, every time I see people from the south on the TV, they're always toothless with banjos - so it's gotta be true.

Micheal wrote:
sigh.

He's a racist by the way.


Really Micheal? His actions tell you that he believes one race to be superior? Which race does he believe to be superior?


darksiege wrote:
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
His position is clearly a reaction to the anticipated racism directed to such hypothetical offspring by others in the future. It is an inappropriate call to make on his part and falls clearly outside his duties, rights, and responsibilities as an officer of the law, but does not necessarily provide evidence one way or the other as to his own racism.


I agree with this statement.


Thirded.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:54 am 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
Either one over the third one, the mixed heritage race.

Isn't segregation considered racism anymore?

Separate but equal was considered racism during the civil rights movement. This not only applied to facilities, but in keeping the races separated. Is this not considered racism anymore? I'm confused, or you are.

My opinion is you must be, because it seems perfectly clear to me.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:41 am 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Micheal wrote:
Either one over the third one, the mixed heritage race.


Which action or statement of the jurist makes you think that he believes either parent to be inherently superior in racial qualities to the prospective child?

Jim Crow laws are symptomatic of racism. Anti-miscegenation laws are symptomatic of racism. Segregation is not racism; it is well documented through studies both in the Bay Area and in Boston that blacks as well as whites were willing to pay more in order to live in neighborhoods that were more racially similar to their own race. Are all those people racist?

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Last edited by Vindicarre on Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:55 am 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
His refusal to marry the couple based on the possibility they might have that child. He refuses to entertain the possibility that such a child could have a reasonable life because neither 'race' would accept the child. He is legislating reproductive rights, to avoid the intermingling of the races.

If that isn't a complete enough answer for you, I won't be able to answer it to your satisfaction, nor do I intend to keep trying.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:10 am 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Nowhere did he say that he thought "that such a child could have a reasonable life". He is legislating nothing, he does not have that power. He has no control over the couple's reproduction.

Nowhere does he give me the impression that he believes any race inherently superior to the other, and I have no clue where you came to that conclusion through any logical means; I can only conclude that you're going with your "gut".

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: South Strikes again.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:30 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Why do we have to put a label on it such as rascism? what does it profit us? He's certainly out of order. He needs to be overruled at the least, or removed at the most.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group