Taskiss wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
You don't really understand what appeal to emotion means, do you?
Sure I do, DE. It's when you are unable to point to any solid evidence to support the argument that's there is a significant issue, you agree that there isn't any criminal prosecution appropriate, yet continue with the ZOMG! Credit card haXX0rz!
I have pointed to solid evidence, namely Blizzard's extensive progrm to deal with the problem.
You keep trying to pretend this isn't solid because it's not in the form of a statistic.
As for criminal prosecution being appropriate, why exactly does something have to be a prosecutable offense for people to disapprove of it, or for it to be a problem? Prosecutability is not the be-all and end-all of determining if there's a problem.
For people that actually do steal the credit card numbers, prosecution is warranted
if it's practical in any case.
You seem not to be able to understand that there are 4 different groups here: gold buyers, gold sellers, hackers, and hackers that steal credit cards, and that what's appropriate for one isn't necessarily for the others. You keep trying to amalgamate them into one group. As you go from left to right in that group, the amount of douchebaggery increases rapidly, as does the criminal activity. I have no problem with prosecuting people for credit card fraud, and "ZOMG its a video game" is not an excuse. People who are buying or selling gold that's involved with hacking and hacking that involves credit card theft are supporting douchebaggery, and in some cases, crime, even if they don't realize it.