The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:38 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 253 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:56 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Hannibal wrote:
Talya wrote:
The wonderful irony here is that unless you support social security, public health care, welfare, and numerous other social programs required for some of these people to survive, that is exactly how you view those people.


Um, no. The design of these programs was not to be survival tools, but a helping hand when a rough patch was hit, or in the case of social security- benefits to a widow. It's not a retirement plan. Welfare was supposed to be temp assistance, not a lifestyle for generations.

Talya wrote:
A parent who is found to give their children pot, or even cigarrettes, or even a steady diet of potato chips, is going to be charged with a crime that will vary from state to state and have their child taken away from them. If you believe the pregnant woman has the same obligation to an unborn fetus that a parent has to a child, then you need to apply the same restrictions to both.


I agree, I want consistancy in laws. If a guy kills a 6month pregnant chick, he shouldn't get slapped with double homicide- yet it's happened. But if we are saying that at 6month and 1 day it's a human being, then why don't we currently charge unhealthy moms, or pregnant women who engage in risky behaviors such as smoking drinking etc with at least child endangerment?

You could try a case such as that on it's own merits if the situation warranted it. That's the great thing about our legal system.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
Nitefox wrote:
Aizle wrote:
That's a really depressing graph.


Looks pretty good to me. Maybe killing babies isn't such a good thing?


You're right, killing things isn't a good thing. I don't believe that anyone that I've ever talked to who supports the right of abortion thinks of them as a "good thing". However, they DO believe that a woman having control over her body is a good thing, and that sometimes, those women get into situations where they have to make very tough, heart breaking decisions. But the key point is that THEY have the right to make that choice.

That's why the graph is depressing.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:00 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Aizle wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Aizle wrote:
That's a really depressing graph.


Looks pretty good to me. Maybe killing babies isn't such a good thing?


You're right, killing things isn't a good thing. I don't believe that anyone that I've ever talked to who supports the right of abortion thinks of them as a "good thing". However, they DO believe that a woman having control over her body is a good thing, and that sometimes, those women get into situations where they have to make very tough, heart breaking decisions. But the key point is that THEY have the right to make that choice.

That's why the graph is depressing.



The right to kill another human being basically. If you are ok with that then I've got nothing for you. Avoiding responsibility is usually never a good thing.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:36 am
Posts: 4320
And that is where we differ. It has the potential to be another human being, but it isn't one yet.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:04 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
And eviction isn't killing. It may lead to death, but it isn't killing.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:06 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Aizle wrote:
And that is where we differ. It has the potential to be another human being, but it isn't one yet.



Nope, it's a person. Keep telling yourself that so you can convince yourself that killing a baby is ok though. Not surprised in the least.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:08 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Talya wrote:
And eviction isn't killing. It may lead to death, but it isn't killing.



Then again, it should be legal for us to kill babies up to I guess, 2 years old? I mean if my nephew and his wife evict their 4 month old daughter, she isn't going to live.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:10 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
Aizle wrote:
Mookhow wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Then we'd just be debating whether or not it should be a crime to leave the eggs unincubated, or eat an omelette.


Coming up after the break, the abortion debate rages on: Should you eat your unborn young scrambled, or sunny side up? Stay tuned!


Definately scrambled.

Image
Stop eating our young!

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:12 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Nitefox wrote:
Aizle wrote:
And that is where we differ. It has the potential to be another human being, but it isn't one yet.



Nope, it's a person. Keep telling yourself that so you can convince yourself that killing a baby is ok though. Not surprised in the least.


And keep using emotionally charged language to convince yourself that your ideals are the right ones.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:15 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Müs wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
Aizle wrote:
And that is where we differ. It has the potential to be another human being, but it isn't one yet.



Nope, it's a person. Keep telling yourself that so you can convince yourself that killing a baby is ok though. Not surprised in the least.


And keep using emotionally charged language to convince yourself that your ideals are the right ones.


Nothing emotionally charged about anything. Just pointing out faulty logic of people who think killing babies is ok. That's what is comes down to. I think my ideals are right, I assume you do as well.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:18 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Nitefox wrote:
Müs wrote:
Nitefox wrote:


Nope, it's a person. Keep telling yourself that so you can convince yourself that killing a baby is ok though. Not surprised in the least.


And keep using emotionally charged language to convince yourself that your ideals are the right ones.


Nothing emotionally charged about anything. Just pointing out faulty logic of people who think killing babies is ok. That's what is comes down to. I think my ideals are right, I assume you do as well.


Uh huh.

Noone's arguing that killing babies is ok.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:20 pm 
Offline
Lean, Mean, Googling Machine
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 2903
Location: Maze of twisty little passages, all alike
Incidentally,

Müs wrote:
You said a fetus is a distinct organism from the mother. Therefore, it should be able to be removed from the mother and survive.

This is begging the question. The part that follows "therefore" does not logically conclude
from what preceded it. You are assuming your own argument in the conclusion.

And in any case, what you conclude doesn't align with standard conventions for biologically classification anyway. Even if we grant that a fetus is a parasite, parasites are still considered distinct from, if nevertheless dependent upon, the host organism.

_________________
Sail forth! steer for the deep waters only!
Reckless, O soul, exploring, I with thee, and thou with me;
For we are bound where mariner has not yet dared to go,
And we will risk the ship, ourselves and all.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:24 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Stathol wrote:
Incidentally,

Müs wrote:
You said a fetus is a distinct organism from the mother. Therefore, it should be able to be removed from the mother and survive.

This is begging the question. The part that follows "therefore" does not logically conclude
from what preceded it. You are assuming your own argument in the conclusion.

And in any case, what you conclude doesn't align with standard conventions for biologically classification anyway. Even if we grant that a fetus is a parasite, parasites are still considered distinct from, if nevertheless dependent upon, the host organism.


>.<

Bad Stat-hole. No Being logical!

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Talya wrote:
And eviction isn't killing. It may lead to death, but it isn't killing.

Which is why we have squatter's rights.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Mookhow wrote:
Damn you mammalian evolutionary path!

No, that's where titties come from.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:27 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Taskiss wrote:
Mookhow wrote:
Damn you mammalian evolutionary path!

No, that's where titties come from.


Mmmm titties.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:27 pm 
Offline
The King
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:34 am
Posts: 3219
Müs wrote:


Uh huh.

Noone's arguing that killing babies is ok.



If you think killing the life inside of a woman is ok, then yes we are talking about killing babies.

_________________
"It is true that democracy undermines freedom when voters believe they can live off of others' productivity, when they modify the commandment: 'Thou shalt not steal, except by majority vote.' The politics of plunder is no doubt destructive of both morality and the division of labor."


Last edited by Nitefox on Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:09 pm
Posts: 252
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/04/10/266861 ... z0mYP24Fmv

50 years to life, for killing a parasite? Hmmmm.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:52 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Farther wrote:
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/04/10/2668615/carmichael-man-gets-50-to-life.html#ixzz0mYP24Fmv

50 years to life, for killing a parasite? Hmmmm.

I'm still waiting for one of these guys lawyers to insist his client should only be charged with ADW and practicing medicine without a license

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:07 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Farther wrote:
50 years to life, for killing a parasite? Hmmmm.


Every sentence handed out under our legal system has had an infallible jury, unaffected by emotional testimony and illogical reasoning.

But that's beside the point. No one here is advocating abortions past the stage of viable life. That was a 6-month old fetus.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:10 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Farther wrote:
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/04/10/2668615/carmichael-man-gets-50-to-life.html#ixzz0mYP24Fmv

50 years to life, for killing a parasite? Hmmmm.


I agree with you. When we kill patasites, like those leetching off the tax dollars of others, there should be no criminal penalties.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:12 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Rynar wrote:
I agree with you. When we kill patasites, like those leetching off the tax dollars of others, there should be no criminal penalties.

You can't say that other humans are parasites, even if you're just making a reference to behavior, because we're all the same species and dictionaries say that can't be.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:17 pm 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Lenas wrote:
Farther wrote:
50 years to life, for killing a parasite? Hmmmm.


Every sentence handed out under our legal system has had an infallible jury, unaffected by emotional testimony and illogical reasoning.

But that's beside the point. No one here is advocating abortions past the stage of viable life. That was a 6-month old fetus.


IT WAS A BABY!!! HE MURDERED A BABY!!!!

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:09 pm
Posts: 252
Lenas wrote:
Farther wrote:
50 years to life, for killing a parasite? Hmmmm.


Every sentence handed out under our legal system has had an infallible jury, unaffected by emotional testimony and illogical reasoning.

But that's beside the point. No one here is advocating abortions past the stage of viable life. That was a 6-month old fetus.


Not really the point. The man was charged with a crime for doing something legally done by Dr's. I'm just pointing out an inconsistency in the law. if it's murder for him to do it, then it's murder for a Dr. to do it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:18 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Lenas:

Kleptoparisitism is very real.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 253 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 332 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group