Sam wrote:
Aethien wrote:
Midgen wrote:
Is Ibanez worth $10mil a year? Thats what his contract will cost you. Aren't the Dodgers pinching pennies because of ownership issues?
The problem the phillies will have getting rid of him, is that they overpaid him when they signed him. He's an aging, injury prone outfielder who is probably better suited for a DH role.
Yeah, they couldn't, or wouldn't, afford $10 million. Payroll is about $110 mil right now, so there's probably not much room for wiggle. But, hey, they can sign a bunch of mediocre guys for $1 or $2 million pop, maybe that will save us.
The one thing holding back the Dodgers is pitching. They have a good core of position players IIRC. And since you can't really create starting pitching depth from FA signings these days, the best bet is to bolster their pen, which is possible via small signings. And the Giants rotation isn't going to be dominate year to year (it hardly ever is because of wear and tear, ups and downs). So, the Dodgers are likely to be in a much better place this year compared to last year.
Owners are getting the divorce stuff settled, so money won't be as tight or shouldn't be as tight with the uncertainty issue. New manager in Mattingly who should give a boost (love Torre, but he got old quick).
Not saying the Dodgers will make the playoffs, but they should be competitive. I think they will vie for a WC spot.
That's a nice vote of confidence. But, actually, the one thing that saved the Dodgers last season was ... pitching. Kershaw, Billingsley, and even Kuroda were pretty solid. Padilla did well, too, when he was one. You could argue that they've done a good job picking up Garland and signing Lilly, giving them at least a semblance of a starting 5. Padilla re-signed, will be the swingman for the year, most likely.
No, what's holding them back is the lack of a known-quantity, feared run-producer in the middle of the lineup. Kemp or Ethier
could be that guy, but they're just reaching that level, if they get back to the form they showed in 2009. But there's a gaping hole in left field, and no good prospect of filling it. Looking more and more like it will be Scott Podsednik (again), giving the Dodgers two (count 'em,
two!) leadoff-type guys (with Furcal). I don't know if Mattingly is going to be good at managing that style of ball.