The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:50 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:32 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
is today's railgun, no kidding.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 0121007476

Railgun, futuristic weapon, tested by Navy

By Michael E. Ruane
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 10, 2010; 10:30 PM

The red and yellow warning flags were out. The gun range was cleared. The klaxon sounded.

"System is enabled," the voice on the speakerphone said. There was a pause, then a distant thud, that could be felt through the floor.

"Gun is fired," the voice said.

Inside a cavernous building at the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Dahlgren, Va., Friday, a gigantic pulse of electricity hurled a 20-pound slug of aluminum out the barrel of an experimental gun at seven times the speed of sound.

The slug trailed a pillar of fire as it left the weapon and the building, illuminating the surrounding woods like a giant flashbulb. It streaked down range, generating a small sonic boom, and traveled about 5,500 feet before tumbling to the ground harmlessly.

In an adjacent building, there was a round of applause from observing scientists.

It was the latest test of the Navy's electromagnetic railgun - a futuristic weapon that is right out of the latest video war game, and could one day change the face of Naval warfare.

Roger Ellis, the railgun program manager, said people "see these things in the video games, but this is real. This is what is very historical."

The gun is fired with a huge jolt of electricity that can propel a round over 100 miles, and at such velocity that it does not need an explosive warhead.

Two tests were conducted Friday - the first of which the Navy said generated a world record 33 meagajoules of force out of the barrel. The second shot, witnessed by reporters, produced 32 megajoules.

Forty-five minutes after the second shot, a part of the battered bullet that was retrieved from the range was still warm to the touch.

The Navy hopes the railgun might bring a sci-fi level of range and fire power to its fleets of the future.

"It's exhilarating," Dr. Elizabeth D'Andrea, the railgun project's strategic director, said after the test.
This Story

The gun itself doesn't look much like a gun. It consists of two rails, along which a surge of electricity runs. They are bolted inside a long oblong box the length of a tractor trailer.

Bundles of thick black cables feed into one end of the box, where the slug is loaded between the rails. When the power is fed through the rails it creates a surge that flings the slug along and out the muzzle at tremendous speed.

Charles Garnett, the railgun project manager at Dahlgren, said it gets its power the same way a pocket camera builds up energy to operate its flash, but on a much larger scale.

The use of electricity to power such a round would change the way naval guns have been fired with explosive propellants like gunpowder for centuries, the Navy said.

The electromagnetic railgun was once a focus of the Reagan-era Strategic Defense Initiative, dubbed "Star Wars." It was a seen as a weapon that might shoot down incoming nuclear missiles.

A quarter century later, the Navy hopes it might soon provide a ship fast, new, long-range fire power.

"It's a very important technology," said Rear Admiral Nevin P. Carr Jr., chief of Naval Research, although "this is not a weapon that's going to be here tomorrow."

Carr, in a telephone interview Thursday, said it also makes for an excellent defensive weapon against such things as enemy cruise missiles.

Indeed, the Navy railgun project's Latin motto is "velocitas eradico," roughly "speed destroys."

Carr said the Navy had been working toward a railgun that could fire a 64 megajoule shot, with a range of 200 miles. "I am not as focused on that number today," he said. "We're more interested in getting capability to the fleet sooner."

He said he would like to see a railgun demonstrated at sea by 2018 and deployed on ships in the early 2020s. After that, further research could make the gun even more powerful. He said the project so far has cost about $211 million.
ad_icon

The first railgun test at Dahlgren took place in 2006, the Navy has said.

Carr said a ship with railguns would need no conventional propellant to fire the weapon, because the non-explosive projectile would be fired with a huge jolt of electricity. That would make the ship safer for the crew and allow the vessel to carry ten times more ammunition, he said.

"It's more than just a better way to push a bullet out the barrel," he said. "Another point . . . is a railgun is not a gun. It's a launcher."

Carr said the "bullet" is hurled into the atmosphere in seconds and can descend on a target in minutes, at a speed of about Mach 5. "That's pretty juicy technology," he said.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:30 pm
Posts: 1776
I ain't impressed until it can travel at the speed of light, pass through anything, and pwn n00bs in a deathmatch.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
Queue DE?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:42 am 
Offline
of course

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:56 am
Posts: 383
Location: CDC EOC
DE? What about someone else? Or more correctly what do you want to know?

Is it real? Yes, the technology exists and is being developed for shipboard deployment.

The obvious next step is precision / smart munitions for accuracy.

_________________
Gorse


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:43 pm 
Offline
I am here, click me!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:00 pm
Posts: 3676
Needs to be hand held. Then it would be awesome.

_________________
Los Angeles Kings 2014 Stanley Cup Champions

"I love this **** team right here."
-Jonathan Quick


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:57 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
Raltar wrote:
Needs to be hand held. Then it would be awesome.

Yeah but you got to start somewhere.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
I don't want to know anything. I was just cracking an inside joke about DE lamenting the lack of a Railgun as possible weapon choices for his EQ Shadow Knight. :p


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Raltar wrote:
Needs to be hand held. Then it would be awesome.

Railguns still follow the laws of physics, dude. You couldn't/wouldn't want to handle the recoil of a hand-mounted variety. Also highly problematic would be the power supply, of course...

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
I thought friction on the rails was the big killer to this technology. I thought previous versions of the weapon were only good for about 5 or so shots before the rails were destroyed.

Perhaps I mis-remembering.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:13 am 
Offline
Deuce Master

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 3099
Give me one of those and I'll be all like "BOOM! HEAD SHOT!"

_________________
The Dude abides.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:17 am 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Raltar wrote:
Needs to be hand held. Then it would be awesome.

Railguns still follow the laws of physics, dude. You couldn't/wouldn't want to handle the recoil of a hand-mounted variety. Also highly problematic would be the power supply, of course...



Recoil could be countered by firing a projectile in both directions. Perhaps not practical, but possible. Power supply is of course the major factor. The fact is that projectiles such as bullets or railgun slugs do damage because of the energy they release when they hit their target. But for that energy to come out, it has to be put IN to the slug.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Raltar wrote:
Needs to be hand held. Then it would be awesome.

Railguns still follow the laws of physics, dude. You couldn't/wouldn't want to handle the recoil of a hand-mounted variety. Also highly problematic would be the power supply, of course...

And following the laws of physics, the recoil from a handheld rail gun would be exactly the same as the recoil from current guns, assuming the same projectile mass and exit velocity.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Ladas wrote:
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Raltar wrote:
Needs to be hand held. Then it would be awesome.

Railguns still follow the laws of physics, dude. You couldn't/wouldn't want to handle the recoil of a hand-mounted variety. Also highly problematic would be the power supply, of course...

And following the laws of physics, the recoil from a handheld rail gun would be exactly the same as the recoil from current guns, assuming the same projectile mass and exit velocity.

At which point, you've gained no benefit by switching to a handheld railgun.

In fact, in the quantities in which ammo is carried, gunpowder is a far more efficient energy storage system than batteries. The reason it becomes practical for the Navy is because they're hauling around nuke reactors anyways.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
I don't disagree. I was just commenting recoil here is not the limiting factor.

It is still a handgun, so you aren't going to be shooting anything larger than current rounds, and you aren't going to be shooting things 200 miles away.

Wanting a handgun version of this would only be for the coolness factor, and then as you said, energy is the problem.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
The video of it is pretty awesome.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:57 pm 
Offline
I am here, click me!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:00 pm
Posts: 3676
They had gauss rifles in Fallout, they can have them irl too! Damnit!

_________________
Los Angeles Kings 2014 Stanley Cup Champions

"I love this **** team right here."
-Jonathan Quick


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:40 am
Posts: 3188
In other news, Vanessa Williams seems to have some information about the company manufacturing this weapon but she cannot be reached by anyone for comment.

_________________
Les Zombis et les Loups-Garous!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Maybe they can use this against the Somali Pirates... I bet it could sink a raft.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 1:10 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Numbuk wrote:
In other news, Vanessa Williams seems to have some information about the company manufacturing this weapon but she cannot be reached by anyone for comment.

LOL Win

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 1532
All that needs to happen now is for the rail gun to be outfitted with a stealth nuclear missile and strapped to the arm of a bipedal tank...

_________________
Ron Paul 2012


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
I think a shark with a mounted rail gun would be pretty cool. With lasers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 12:10 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Railguns still follow the laws of physics, dude. You couldn't/wouldn't want to handle the recoil of a hand-mounted variety. Also highly problematic would be the power supply, of course...


The idea with a handheld railgun is speed (and therefore also accuracy) and penetrating power. You use a very small, very tough, needle-like round that will go right through armor. The actual mass is low, but this is compensated for because the velocity is exceptionally high. Thanks to the low mass of the round, the recoil isn't that bad.

Not very efficient or practical, I think, but would make one heck of a nice expensive armor-piercing sniper rifle.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:27 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
A very small needle-like round that is fired from a weapon with enough velocity to penetrate armor will:
1) Still have sizable recoil if the armor is substantial
2) Do as much damage as a needle, that is to say not much.
You'll end up with a needle sized hole in the armor and an opponent that suffered next to no trauma.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:40 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
It will snap into multiple pieces once it leaves the muzzle.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:40 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
I still like the railgun-fired chainsaws idea


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 223 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group