The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:35 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:24 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Here is my issue with DRM... I buy a LOT of movies. I am now using Netflix as a screener... if the movie sucks, I will not buy it.

I have already purchased three movies that I saw on Netflix, and I plan to go buy all of the Buffy shows as well.

I buy movies not only for the entertainment I get from them, but because I enjoy collecting them. Some people have comic books, some have cards... I have movies.

I do not want to carry 5+ discs every time I want to take my computer somewhere.

If I want to take a DVD I own, make a digital copy of it, for my own personal viewing... why the crap should that be illegal?

I do not even share these files to my XBox. But I spent my money on making the movie, I should have the right to view it however I feel like it.

I do not plan to share the files, hell I hate the idea of sharing my bandwidth with the other computers on my network, let alone someone accessing my system to download a movie.

Hell... I generally do not even lend out my DVDs to anyone. (except Repo... must hook people on that movie)

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 9:24 am 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
SuiNeko wrote:
Kaffis - its adding to the complexity, cost and presumably power draw of the chip, for something of no value to me as a consumer, and that has to date proven ineffective in preventing piracy.

(DERAIL INC)

Also, intellectual property is an interesting proposition - I think the idea that it equates to actual property (permanent and absolute ownership / control) is a debatable one [*].

For me, the question is a pragmatic one, about incentivising and rewarding those who produce cultural content or expand the bounds of our knowledge - to promote a common good, and is not one of an obvious defacto ownership.

Cultural products almost universally build on others prior work.

Developments in research expose and utilise core facts about the world.

Neither of those, to me, equate to an obvious positive benefit from, or right to, perpetual ownership.

[*] I know copyright and patent terms are limited, but they are both repeatedly being extended, and rendered irrelevant by DRM and things like the DCMA supporting a post-copyright lock in mechanism.

Do you deserve the fruit of you labor (to get paid when you work)

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 289 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group