Xequecal wrote:
Vindicarre wrote:
Once again, you are making comments as if someone said what you've written. No one has advocated harming in any way politicians families, and non one has advocated "disappearing" anyone, especially "selecting" them "once in a while" after they're "deemed" anything. I am glad, though, that the random conversations you're having with people in your head amuse you.
No, Corolinth did not express this particular sentiment in this particular post, but since you read the same board I do, you must be aware of the many posters who suggest extreme punishments up to and including execution for even the most minor of infractions for all public officials, so I don't feel unjustified in lumping someone in with them when he posts a picture that implies mass murder is the only viable option.
I read
this board. I am aware that there are posters who believe in the execution of publicly elected officials who deliberately break their oath of office. What I have not read on this board is where people call for the things you stated they call for. Do you
really read the same board I do?
I am not calling you out on "lumping someone in with them", I am calling you out on your hysterical use of hyperbole and the way you pretend that people have said things they haven't.
Oh, a picture of a musket used in the American Revolution does not imply mass murder, most prominently because a 300 year old musket is not an effective means of "mass murder".
_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
