The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:29 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:19 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Xequecal:

Treason is limited to committing a documentable act of war against the United States or its Allies during a period of active military involvement. The problem here isn't that the U.S. is violating any treaties with Britain, it's that the U.S. will be demonstrably giving aid and comfort (of a very military variety) to the enemy state (Russia) of our own allied state (the UK).

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 2:15 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
But espionage is not an act of war is it?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:34 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
TheRiov wrote:
But espionage is not an act of war is it?


An "act of war" is only part of the Constitutional definition of treason; it would definitely qualify as giving "aid and comfort".

Article 3 Section III wrote:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:48 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
That makes the assumption that Russia is the enemy. If we have a treaty with them, are they considered so?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:30 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Its my opinion that until a war is declared no nation should be considered an enemy.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
TheRiov wrote:
That makes the assumption that Russia is the enemy. If we have a treaty with them, are they considered so?


This is where I'm losing you as well, Khross. If we treat with both parties, both are allies.

Is stabbing one in the back for the benefit of another treason?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:53 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Russia's still considered a hostile state per NATO treaty provisions. For that matter, START, in any configuration, does not remove that status from Russia. Consequently, we are providing aid and comfort to an enemy state at the expense of actual, bound ally states.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Khross wrote:
Russia's still considered a hostile state per NATO treaty provisions. For that matter, START, in any configuration, does not remove that status from Russia. Consequently, we are providing aid and comfort to an enemy state at the expense of actual, bound ally states.


Treason is defined in the constitution, and hostile state is not.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

Assuming then that Russia falls within "Enemies", which I would contest, then would not providing foreign aid be giving them Aid and Comfort?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:52 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Khross wrote:
Russia's still considered a hostile state per NATO treaty provisions. For that matter, START, in any configuration, does not remove that status from Russia. Consequently, we are providing aid and comfort to an enemy state at the expense of actual, bound ally states.


Treason is defined in the constitution, and hostile state is not.

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

Assuming then that Russia falls within "Enemies", which I would contest, then would not providing foreign aid be giving them Aid and Comfort?


I think, and I'm not entirely sure about this, but "aid" is given to the people of the country, not their government.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:27 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
one could argue that he's supporting OUR country-- an assistance to the enemy is incidental.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:33 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Khross wrote:
Russia's still considered a hostile state per NATO treaty provisions. For that matter, START, in any configuration, does not remove that status from Russia. Consequently, we are providing aid and comfort to an enemy state at the expense of actual, bound ally states.


Seeing as how the British are not in any sort of state of war with Russia, this is questionable at best. The mere fact that a state is hostile, or an enemy does not make them the same as a "wartime enemy". While I disagree with the new START treaty, and I am appalled by Obama's attitude towards the British, I think you are stretching to call this treason.

I should also point out that the President is empowered to create treaties with other states, and the only restriction on that power is the consent of the Senate, and the fact that no treaty can contradict the Constitution. The comparison with the Rosenbergs is therefore spurious; neither was the President, nor his representative or plenipotentiary.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:39 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
TheRiov wrote:
That makes the assumption that Russia is the enemy. If we have a treaty with them, are they considered so?


Russia is not an "enemy" in the most serious sense of the word because we are not at war with them. They could be an "enemy" or "hostile" in other senses because both sides are prepared to fight a nuclear war at (more or less) a moment's notice. They are certainly not "friendly", nor does the mere existance of a treaty on some matter make them an ally. SALT I led to an interim agreement on launchers and the ABM treaty as far back as the 1970s, but that hardly made the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. allies.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 3:19 am 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
Who are we at WAAUUUGH!! with?

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 278 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group