The Glade 4.0

I'd much rather tell you where to go and what to shove up what orifice, and then tell you how many times to pull the trigger. The others Here at least occasionally respond to me with a modicum of intelligent discourse. You've never given me anything but your hatred and venom.

19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

In this case, I think Riov was probably just listing out people that disagree with him the majority of the time, in which case the list could probably be simplified: The Glade (126947+ posts).

This made me laugh so hard.

Khross (3400+ posts, 2000+ in hellfire), Elmo (2300+ posts, 1600+ in Hellfire) Screeling, (2000+ posts, 700+ in Hellfire ), Vindicarre (2700+ posts, 1200+ in hellfire) , Darkseige (3100+ posts, 800+ posts in Hellfire)

But you're coming dangerously close to the textbook definition of libel.

I don't weigh in on economics because I generally don't feel qualified to do so, nor do I have strong opinions either way. I DO have very firm beliefs on a number of other topics which I'm happy to speak up on. And you're not even close to good or skilled enough to slap me around.

It's difficult to backtrack and act the innocent revisionist when the message board preserves everything you say.



With this statement you have dismissed the books claims as unlikely, and in doing so have discredited the work and the author, and presented your reasoning for doing so, without ever reading the book... or even a poorly written review of the book. You are either being intellectually dishonest, or a complete moron. Choose.



Can you read? Did you notice the qualifier "minimally in a cursory manner"? What do you suppose you bring to a debate when you argue from a position of complete willful ignorance and dishonesty?

I can assure you that I have some degree of expertise in everything I post about on these boards, and that I certainly never offered debate on a subject I didn't have understanding of.

Go **** yourself, TheRiov.

Actually, I agree with you here, TheRiov.

Wrong forum, TheRiov. Not to mention the fact that your port is ignorant, and erroneous. Most of us who advocate an Austrian system, do so because we know how much our current model actually hurts the poor by creating a permanent underclass, and creating racial preferences in hiring actually institutionalizes racial strife. The list of these sorts of grievances is lengthy.

Socialism actually hurts the poor more than anyone else, because when you discourage wealth creation, those who have the least are hurt the most. When food prices rise, it is their children who go hungry. When fuel prices rise, it is they who can't heat their homes.

Conservatism has the benefit of a forward thinking compassion. Given that, it would seem to me that if one really cared, they would want to actually help, instead of simply doing things that make them feel good about themselves, or the even lazier, doing nothing more than holding opinions that make them feel good about themselves.

19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Let's be clear here Rynar.
I don't like you. I'm quite happy to put you on ignore.
But you're coming dangerously close to the textbook definition of libel.

19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

A)child molestation is a felony. Racism is not

B) racism as we proved is subjective. Child molestation is not

C) I can provide witnesses to racist opinions voiced a racist opinion here. Find someone who has seen me commit a sex crime against a minor.

19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

child molestation is a felony. Racism is not

racism as we proved is subjective. Child molestation is not

C) I can provide witnesses to racist opinions voiced a racist opinion here. Find someone who has seen me commit a sex crime against a minor.

/shrug

Not sure what to tell you there. You're asking him to tell you why he thinks you lean toward the right. That's my high level assessment of your political leanings as well, although I do believe you're more reasonable than most here on the boards. Why do I believe that? The fast answer is "based on many years of your posting history". I've frankly forgotten many of those posts, but recall the bucket that I put you in (fairly or unfairly) each time. Were I to really want to press home why, it would require a fair bit of post farming to come up with the examples.

When undercover video like the NPR story first surfaces, we often look to see if there is raw video of the material used to produce the report as a basis for evaluating the accuracy of the representations made. And we decided to do that in this case.

The Blaze’s Pam Key, who produces most of our original videos, is experienced in reviewing hours and hours of raw audio/video to find key sections that can then be used in proper context. Her review of the NPR exposé identifies a number of areas to examine.

1. Muslim Brotherhood Connections

Much of the consternation over this video centers on the question of why would NPR executives meet with a group connected to Muslim Brotherhood. Did they know? And if Muslim Brotherhood is mentioned, how are the ties characterized? Is the edited video misleading on these points?

...The edited video includes a reference to some of the original founders of MEAC being members of the Muslim Brotherhood in America. Is this the only reference and basis for the NPR execs to consider MEAC to have a Muslim Brotherhood connection? The raw video also includes a longer section of description that seems to downplay connections of the MEAC group to the Muslim Brotherhood as popularly perceived.

2. Does Ron Schiller react to “Sharia” mission statement with amusement?

So after saying that the MEAC website advocates the “acceptance of Sharia,” the video cuts to the NPR exec saying, “Really? That’s what they said?” The cadence is jovial and upbeat and the narration moves on. The implication is that the NPR exec is aware and perhaps amused or approving of the MEAC mission statement. But when you look at the raw video you realize he was actually recounting an unrelated and innocuous issue about confusion over names in the restaurant reservation.

3. How does Schiller describe Republicans?

Schiller’s negative comments about Republicans and conservatives have gotten a great deal of attention....But you may be surprised to learn, that in the raw video, Schiller also speaks positively about the GOP. He expresses pride in his own Republican heritage and his belief in fiscal conservatism.

4. The “seriously racist” Tea Party

NPR exec Ron Schiller does describe Tea Party members as “xenophobic…seriously racist people”....But the clip in the edited video implies Schiller is giving simply his own analysis of the Tea Party. He does do that in part, but the raw video reveals that he is largely recounting the views expressed to him by two top Republicans, one a former ambassador, who admitted to him that they voted for Obama.

5. Are liberals more educated than conservatives?

You may also have seen a section of the video where Schiller describes liberals as more educated than conservatives. But the raw video shows a section where Schiller is hesitant to criticize the education of conservatives and the other executive, Betsy Liley, is outspoken in her defense of the intellects of Fox News viewers....The impression of the original video, that the execs were only hostile toward Republicans and conservatives, is incorrect.

I had to look up what The Blaze was too, it's a Glenn Beck website.

Lol! You're kidding?! So, I just approvingly linked a Glenn Beck site as a source? Awesome.

Lol! You're kidding?! So, I just approvingly linked a Glenn Beck site as a source? Awesome.

The Blaze is a news, information and opinion site brought to you by Glenn Beck and a dedicated team of writers, journalists & video producers.