We have had this discussion multiple times in the past, as well as the related discussions about how the general approach to education will cause lowering the bar, not elevating the student.
WSJ article from the DoEd regarding just that practice. What was obvious, but not mentioned, was the hypocrisy that is the government always claiming how education funds are so well spent and use the test scores as proof.
Also, a more minor note, but considering SC is always touted as the worst in the country for education... this was interesting:
Quote:
Among the findings:
* Thirty-one states deemed fourth-graders proficient in reading when they would have rated below basic on NAEP. Mississippi's standards were lowest, and Massachusetts' were highest.
* Seventeen states deemed eighth-graders proficient at reading when they would have rated below basic on NAEP. Tennessee's standards were lowest, and South Carolina's were highest.
* Ten states deemed fourth- and eighth-graders proficient at math when they would have rated below basic on NAEP. Tennessee's standards were lowest; Massachusetts had the highest fourth-grade math standards, and South Carolina had the highest eighth-grade standards.
Which just reinforces the point to some degree... the state deemed the worst because of test scores has the highest standards... not to mention
every student in SC high schools takes the college entrances exams (usually the SAT), which badly skews the totals compared to most states.