The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 9:51 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » The Glade » Hellfire

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 14 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Vindicarre
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:45 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/01/opini ... ml?_r=2&hp
Paul Krugman wrote:
Here’s the report’s explanation of how layoffs would create jobs: “A smaller government work force increases the available supply of educated, skilled workers for private firms, thus lowering labor costs.” Dropping the euphemisms, what this says is that by increasing unemployment, particularly of “educated, skilled workers” — in case you’re wondering, that mainly means schoolteachers — we can drive down wages, which would encourage hiring.

There is, if you think about it, an immediate logical problem here: Republicans are saying that job destruction leads to lower wages, which leads to job creation. But won’t this job creation lead to higher wages, which leads to job destruction, which leads to ...? I need some aspirin.

Beyond that, why would lower wages promote higher employment?

[My bold]

And this guy won a Nobel in economics...

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
TheRiov
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:56 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
If there is no work to be done, lower wages just increase profit margins, yes?
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Lex Luthor
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
He makes sense to me. You can't fix unemployment by getting rid of jobs. Also people won't apply for jobs that don't pay as well.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
darksiege
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:23 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Lower wages mean that if an employer can hire two guys to do four guys worth of work, but only be paying the price they would pay for one person normally... unemployment would go down, in theory.

As opposed to paying one guy to do three guys worth of work and paying a higher price per employee. A wise employer would know that if they can double the number of workers for the same price as they were paying, they can also get more work done.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Lex Luthor
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
If that one person you paid was at market value, then if it was skilled labor you're not gonna find people to do it at half or quarter wages. Even if you did, they'd leave A.S.A.P. for a different job that pays right.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Lex Luthor
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Also you have to factor in the cost of training, and human resources costs involved. Getting rid of a guy is an enormous cost because you have to train up more people, which can take a year in some cases.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Vindicarre
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:32 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Read the report, or at least the article, Lex, maybe then you won't sound like you have no idea what's being discussed.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
darksiege
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:21 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Lex Luthor wrote:
If that one person you paid was at market value, then if it was skilled labor you're not gonna find people to do it at half or quarter wages. Even if you did, they'd leave A.S.A.P. for a different job that pays right.


For the past several years, I have been doing two or three people's worth of work on a daily basis... and I understand I can be replaced. BUT... if my employer could hire two people for my salary and get each of those people to do the same amount of work I currently do... why wouldn't they?

There have been people hired into the department I am in that are very overqualified for the job we are doing who took the jobs that are making less than I am. They do this because it was better than not working.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
TheRiov
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:30 pm 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
If a company only sells enough to employ 100 people, no matter what they get paid, they'll only hire 100 people. In my experience (granted I'm not an economist) but many companies dont have enough work to employ more workers. Getting those workers for cheaper only drives up the profit margins, but does not create more jobs.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Khross
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:34 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Driving down wages simply drives down wages. Krugman, as usual, is an incompetent twit.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Arathain Kelvar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
I get what he's trying to say, though.

Increase supply (of workers, through unemployment) = lower prices (wages).

But, as employers snap up these cheap workers (demand), prices (wages) would rise until the equilibrium is met.

And this is true, in a closed system. You can't increase employment by driving down wages due to layoffs. (Assuming supply and demand were balanced initially.) But it's not closed and much more complicated.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
darksiege
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:12 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
...Ceteris paribus...

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Arathain Kelvar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
yes.
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Hannibal
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2011 8:02 am 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
As always, Krugman doesn't follw the river to the source since it would disprove his theories. Who pays the workers? The owner(s). Who pays the owner(s)? The consumer. What is consumed? A product or service. What product or service does the avg gov worker use to compete with in the market? ........

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 14 posts ] 

Board index » The Glade » Hellfire

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group