Killuas wrote:
LadyKate wrote:
I don't get it...what's wrong with addressing the porn thing? Aren't various agendas constantly flowing through there?
Well lets say they do go after it (I don't agree that all porn is bad personally) who is going to do the investigations ad prosecutions. The FBI and other law enforcement agencies only have so many resources. If they expend effort towards this then they have to take away resources from other areas. I think most people would agree stopping potential terrorist, gun smuggling and a whole host of other illegal activities are a higher priority than people bumping uglies on film. So ae they going to hire more people when we already are in debt?
I would agree that going after child porn is a good thing though.
On top of all that, the letter is horribly vague. I mean what the hell exactly is "hardcore porn" to them? It used to be that was anything that actually showed penetration. That's covers a huge amount of material, the vast majority of which is not bad at all.