The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:51 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Nitefox wrote:
After reading what I wrote I would say no. They can band all they want. But the company should be able to say "suck it" to what the group wants without any kind of legal reprisal. That group of people then have a choice, as I laid out previously. "Hey, we tried...let's get back to work". Or..."Well screw them! I'm going to work for soandso." It should be that simple.

Agreed. I just wanted to clarify your view on that, because I often get the impression in these discussions that for conservatives and libertarians there's an implicit distaste for the whole idea of employees negotiating as a group instead of doing it as individuals.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
RangerDave wrote:
Big companies usually set wages as a matter of company policy for given positions, not based on personalized, employee-by-employee negotiations

And why is that?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Ladas wrote:
And why is that?

Basically because the transaction costs would outweigh the potential gains.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
And the factors driving the transaction costs and the implementation of salary banding?

Unions and liability.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Not sure I have a view on whether unions are driving salary banding in non-unionized companies, but sure, potential liability is a factor. Much more than that, though, is the simple fact that it's not worth the time and cost involved to negotiate with 10,000 (or however many) individual employees, most of whom are pretty interchangeable and easily replaceable. The way it actually works is the company does periodic reviews of overall operations and prevailing industry wages, and then sets their payscale accordingly.


Last edited by RangerDave on Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:04 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
Because employees have no true information on the value of their labor.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:05 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
RangerDave wrote:
I'm not sure what your objection is here. Big companies usually set wages as a matter of company policy for given positions, not based on personalized, employee-by-employee negotiations.

I have no real objection to this statement. I was really trying to get to a value statement on your part.

RangerDave wrote:
Vindicarre wrote:
What are you really proposing? That unions are necessary for low-skill, low-wage employees? That low-skill jobs should pay more than their market value determines? That Wal-Mart employees aren't paid fairly?

I'm not saying anything about fairness or even necessity. I'm simply noting that employees in low-skill positions at large companies will have very little individual bargaining power and will therefore end up with lower wages, on average, than they could get if they formed a union and negotiated as a bloc.


Heheh, I guess we're at cross purposes here; I'm trying to pull a value statement out of you and your trying not to make a value statement.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:08 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
RangerDave wrote:
Nitefox wrote:
After reading what I wrote I would say no. They can band all they want. But the company should be able to say "suck it" to what the group wants without any kind of legal reprisal. That group of people then have a choice, as I laid out previously. "Hey, we tried...let's get back to work". Or..."Well screw them! I'm going to work for soandso." It should be that simple.

Agreed. I just wanted to clarify your view on that, because I often get the impression in these discussions that for conservatives and libertarians there's an implicit distaste for the whole idea of employees negotiating as a group instead of doing it as individuals.


I'd check into what libertarians stand for as far as individual rights. I can't really see a libertarian arguing against the right of free association. Now, Governmental favoritism and unions forcibly collecting dues to spend on elections of lawmakers who make union rules allowing unions to forcibly collect union dues...

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Vindicarre wrote:
Heheh, I guess we're at cross purposes here; I'm trying to pull a value statement out of you and your trying not to make a value statement.

*chuckle* Yeah, I'm kind of a bad liberal when it comes to union issues. I don't see corporations as the bad guys and employees as noble underdogs. In my view, they're both just self-interested parties trying to get the best deal they can in a commercial transaction, and unions are (or at least can be) an effective way for employees to increase their bargaining power.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:28 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Then I guess we have no real disagreement here; does that mean we have to manufacture one? :evil:

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Absolutely! This is Hellfire, after all, so let's see...uhh...tastes great?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:55 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
What other reason is there?

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:28 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Vindicarre wrote:
Then I guess we have no real disagreement here; does that mean we have to manufacture one? :evil:


Union regulations prohibit any manufacturing by non-union personnel.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:48 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Dammit!

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:04 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
Its okay Vindi, just assign the manufacturing task to the Union personnel. Less Filling.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:01 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Micheal wrote:
Its okay Vindi, just assign the manufacturing task to the Union personnel. Less Filling.


Yeah, but we actually want to get it *done*.

Tastes great.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 1:30 am 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
The artificially raised price of labor due to unions costs some people and it's not the corporations. It's the consumers. A small group of people subsidizes the union benefits. The union raises the costs of doing business in an efficient manner (and sometimes promotes protectionisim and prevents competition for the jobs they hold). They are special interest groups.

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
RangerDave wrote:
Not sure I have a view on whether unions are driving salary banding in non-unionized companies

You sure about that?

RangerDave wrote:
The way it actually works is the company does periodic reviews of overall operations and prevailing industry wages, and then sets their payscale accordingly.

Ah, there it is.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Wwen wrote:
The artificially raised price of labor due to unions...

What's artificial about it, though? As I said to Nitefox: "I often get the impression in these discussions that for conservatives and libertarians* there's an implicit distaste for the whole idea of employees negotiating as a group instead of doing it as individuals." Do you think negotiating as a group is inherently "artificial"? If so, why?

*Which is not to say that you're necessarily either, Wwen.


Last edited by RangerDave on Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
You sure about that?

Ah, good point. Guess I didn't think that one all the way through.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:27 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Negotiating as a group is fine. However, no company should be legally forced into negotiating with a group. (And i firmly believe government shold be legally prohibited from negotiating collectively. No union should be in a position to hold the taxpayer hostage.)

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:49 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Talya wrote:
Negotiating as a group is fine. However, no company should be legally forced into negotiating with a group. (And i firmly believe government shold be legally prohibited from negotiating collectively. No union should be in a position to hold the taxpayer hostage.)


This puts it very nicely.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:58 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
I disagree and think you are incredibly naive.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 1:04 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
There is nothing wrong with public sector unions - as long as they cannot go on strike. They are not "holding the taxpayer hostage" any more than a union negotiating with a business would be, without all the extra protections unions get.

Taxpayers are not sacred; they should not be protected from having to pay for services by artificially restricing the freedom of association of government employees any more than unions should have special laws to protect them.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 2:03 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Rynar wrote:
Xequecal wrote:
Rynar wrote:
Some shares pay dividends, not all. Most investment portfolios don't generate current income.

But more importantly, who are these mythical shareholders you speak of?


You're going to have to tell me what your point is. The people who own shares of the company expect the company to make as much profit as possible by any means necessary, because they enrich themselves when the company does so.


/facepalm

Not "what" is a shareholder, "who" are these shareholders. What sorts of investment vehicles are the shares in, and who owns them?


I ask again.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 282 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group