Ulfynn wrote:
I don't go to a 3D version of a film any longer. In my opinion, the 3D elements and the glasses distract (and detract) from the film-going experience. I don't so much care if the 3D fad dies off or not, as long as they continue to offer the same films in a 2D format.
Unfortunately, it's starting to sound like until 3D dies out, it's even crippling our 2D films:
http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2011/05/22/misuse_of_3_d_digital_lens_leaves_2_d_movies_in_the_dark/?page=fullQuote:
So why aren’t theater personnel simply removing the 3-D lenses? The answer is that it takes time, it costs money, and it requires technical know-how above the level of the average multiplex employee. James Bond, a Chicago-based projection guru who serves as technical expert for Roger Ebert’s Ebertfest, said issues with the Sonys are more than mechanical. Opening the projector alone involves security clearances and Internet passwords, “and if you don’t do it right, the machine will shut down on you.’’ The result, in his view, is that often the lens change isn’t made and “audiences are getting shortchanged.’’