The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 11:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 232 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 7:44 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Xequecal wrote:
You haven't funded the courts yet, or the FBI, or things like the Dept of Energy. (which oversees the nuclear weapons)

Bottom line your suggestion isn't a country. It's 50 seperate countries with a military alliance.


Courts would be an issue but they could remand the cases to state courts if necessary. The FBI and DOE shouldn't exist.

Have you read the Constitution Xeq?

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Elmarnieh wrote:
I am ok with stopping overseas military operations.

Everything else stops.


That's a perfectly valid position. However, this is why we have a multiple elected officials, rather than one guy making the decisions. It makes such ideas nearly impossible to implement. That's a good thing.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 8:45 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
I am ok with stopping overseas military operations.

Everything else stops.


That's a perfectly valid position. However, this is why we have a multiple elected officials, rather than one guy making the decisions. It makes such ideas nearly impossible to implement. That's a good thing.



Sure, I'm just replying to RD's article which showed why it isn't acceptable...well it actually is acceptable to some people and I wanted to point out why.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Elmarnieh wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
I am ok with stopping overseas military operations.

Everything else stops.


That's a perfectly valid position. However, this is why we have a multiple elected officials, rather than one guy making the decisions. It makes such ideas nearly impossible to implement. That's a good thing.



Sure, I'm just replying to RD's article which showed why it isn't acceptable...well it actually is acceptable to some people and I wanted to point out why.


Do you agree that it's not acceptable to the vast majority of citizens? Because I think that's the intended audience for her article.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:38 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:

That's a perfectly valid position. However, this is why we have a multiple elected officials, rather than one guy making the decisions. It makes such ideas nearly impossible to implement. That's a good thing.



Sure, I'm just replying to RD's article which showed why it isn't acceptable...well it actually is acceptable to some people and I wanted to point out why.


Do you agree that it's not acceptable to the vast majority of citizens? Because I think that's the intended audience for her article.



No idea. I guess we will see.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
From the article:

Quote:
If you try to artificially create a situation that requires drastic cuts, voters are going to get rid of you, not the spending....There is no neat strategic maneuver which will allow you to bypass the American public and cut their government benefits by 40% overnight if they don't want you to. And if you think that the American public actually wants you to do it . . . well, then it's not Washington, DC that's out of touch with the rest of America.


Like Arathain said, your position is entirely valid, Elm, and I respect the honesty of it. However, that's just not a position favored by most of the country.


Last edited by RangerDave on Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:10 am 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
From a purely practical standpoint, denying the increase to the debt limit is the only way the problems with the US system are going to get fixed. Nevermind that it's all based on partisan bullshit (rather than common sense on the part of the people denying the increase), and could easily happen exactly the same way with a republican president and a democratic congress, this is something that needs to be done.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Talya wrote:
From a purely practical standpoint, denying the increase to the debt limit is the only way the problems with the US system are going to get fixed.

Can you elaborate on what you mean, Taly? In particular:
  • What are the problems with the US system?
  • What would constitute a "fixed" system?
  • How would refusing to raise the debt limit help achieve that?
  • Why is that the only way?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:28 am 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Question: I disagree with raising the debt ceiling, and believe cuts must be made and spending controlled.

That said, what is it about this instance of raising of the debt ceiling that has everyone's panties in a bunch? This particular one? It appears this isn't exactly an uncommon occurrence:

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:31 am 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
When individuals get into debt issues, never does the financial adviser suggest getting into more debt as a way to climb out. That would be absurd.

The problem becomes that no one wants to make needed cuts (EVERYTHING IS NEEDED) and have their retarded voters vote for the guy that will promise the moon to win now and then let some future person pay for it. Eventually that won't work anymore.

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:39 am 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Yes. My question is "What makes this, right now, 'eventually?'"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
It has to do with the recent explosion of influence of the Tea Party, and the fact that we've increased our debt under 2.5 years of Obama as much as 8 years of Bush2.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:44 am 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
The shape of the graph converging on the y = 1/x family, specifically the region near the vertical asymptote.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
It looks more like exponential growth to me, which is common to most things involving finance.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Wwen wrote:
When individuals get into debt issues, never does the financial adviser suggest getting into more debt as a way to climb out. That would be absurd.


Sure they do - consolidation loans, mortgage refinancings, home equity credit lines, etc. are all common suggestions for people to get their overall financial situations in order by better managing their monthly cash flow. The idea is generally to reduce expenses and pay your bills in a controlled, orderly manner as you gradually climb out of the hole. Heck, even bankruptcy is designed to be a gradual, orderly process.

On the other hand, "Just stop paying 40% of your bills and deal with whatever happens as a result," is genuinely not something a financial advisor would suggest.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
It has to do with the recent explosion of influence of the Tea Party, and the fact that we've increased our debt under 2.5 years of Obama as much as 8 years of Bush2.

I agree on the first half of your explanation, Kaffis, but I think the debt increase is basically irrelevant. If McCain had won in 2008, the debt would have gone up by roughly the same amount anyway, and Tea Party or no, the GOP in Congress wouldn't have complained any more than they did under Bush2. The timing and intensity of this are about politics, not policy. Any Republican who votes to raise the debt limit (or to increase taxes to reduce the deficit) while a Democrat is in the White House would be toast in the GOP primaries thanks to the Tea Party. That's basically all this comes down to.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
I never meant to assign blame to Obama; I'm happy to concede that McCain would have been similar.

I disagree that the Tea Party would continue to be silent under McCain. Would they have gained as much traction without a blatantly socialist President to vilify? Perhaps not. But the dissatisfaction with our nation's fiscal policies has been decades in coming, IMO.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
RangerDave wrote:
On the other hand, "Just stop paying 40% of your bills and deal with whatever happens as a result," is genuinely not something a financial advisor would suggest.

No, but "cut 40% of luxury services and feel-good charity out of your budget; you can't afford them anymore" is. Including re-evaluating what is and is not luxury.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Last edited by Kaffis Mark V on Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
RangerDave wrote:
Wwen wrote:
When individuals get into debt issues, never does the financial adviser suggest getting into more debt as a way to climb out. That would be absurd.


Sure they do - consolidation loans, mortgage refinancings, home equity credit lines, etc.


Studen loans as an investment in future earnings. Loans to prepare assets to sell to get out of debt.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
RangerDave wrote:
On the other hand, "Just stop paying 40% of your bills and deal with whatever happens as a result," is genuinely not something a financial advisor would suggest.

No, but "cut 40% of luxury services and feel-good charity out of your budget; you can't afford them anymore" is.


That's where these arguments fail. I haven't heard anyone come up with 40% that we can cut overnight, that could reasonably be considered a luxury.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:22 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
FarSky wrote:
Yes. My question is "What makes this, right now, 'eventually?'"



They explained this concept in Spaceballs.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:32 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Quote:
If anyone in the media is listening, here is the story I want reported on...

How much room would we have on the debt limit, if the Fed had not unilaterally decided to buy 2.1 trillion dollars of US Debt in the last 18 months (aka QE1 and QE2...QE1 buy 1.5 trillion worth of MortgageBackedSecurities from bank, so said banks could buy the debt...QE2 direct purchase of 600 Billion in debt) because no one else on the planet was willing to buy our debt...

We have already defaulted...Audit the FED and begin the prosecutions


Found this on the MSNBC comments on the debt and thought it was worth repeating.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:39 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
FarSky wrote:
Question: I disagree with raising the debt ceiling, and believe cuts must be made and spending controlled.

That said, what is it about this instance of raising of the debt ceiling that has everyone's panties in a bunch? This particular one?


As I see it:
1) Increased public awareness
2) The massive size of the current debt and the massive size of the increase
3) Spending reductions are never enacted without leverage, and this is some mighty good leverage


RangerDave wrote:
From the article:

Quote:
If you try to artificially create a situation that requires drastic cuts, voters are going to get rid of you, not the spending....There is no neat strategic maneuver which will allow you to bypass the American public and cut their government benefits by 40% overnight if they don't want you to. And if you think that the American public actually wants you to do it . . . well, then it's not Washington, DC that's out of touch with the rest of America.


Like Arathain said, your position is entirely valid, Elm, and I respect the honesty of it. However, that's just not a position favored by most of the country.


No ****? People don't want to give up things they feel they're entitled to? There's a reason they're called entitlements, the same reason why they needed to pass Obamacare "so we can see what 's in it".

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Vindicarre wrote:
No ****? People don't want to give up things they feel they're entitled to? There's a reason they're called entitlements, the same reason why they needed to pass Obamacare "so we can see what 's in it".


Except that we're not talking about entitlements.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 4:13 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
When someone writes "government benefits", I see "entitlements". What are "government benefits" to you?

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 232 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 373 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group