The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:31 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:41 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Holy ****. I find this view extremely intolerable.


I don't really care. I find a lot of the views here intolerable.

Quote:
So were you right? Is he wanted for something else?


I didn't bother to look. I said it was probable, not certain. If not, it really means he was just an idiot.

There really should be laws requiring you to properly identify yourself once you are arrested upon probable cause. Not identifying yourself is not a right, nor does it pertain to any right against self-incrimination.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Diamondeye wrote:
There really should be laws requiring you to properly identify yourself once you are arrested upon probable cause. Not identifying yourself is not a right, nor does it pertain to any right against self-incrimination.

So, indeed, there is no such law?

Under what grounds, then, was he held?

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
shuyung wrote:
So the entirety of your stance on why this gentleman (and, we can assume, anyone else) should remain in custody for refusal to provide verbal (or better) identification regardless of fulfillment of sentences applied for convictions, is that he might be guilty of something else somewhere? Have I got that right?


If you refuse to testify in court, you can be locked up until you agree to testify. This is true even if you're almost certainly innocent of any other crime other than refusing to testify.

I do not see how this is any different. If you don't identify yourself, you can be held until you do. Giving your name is not self-incrimination, so there is no reason why the police/government can't require you to identify yourself.

The amount of hostility towards police in this thread is astounding. There is no reason other than a flat out mistrust/hatred of police in general for one to think one should not have to give the police their name.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:13 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Given that throughout the history of the United States, police have repeatedly shown a willingness to abuse their power and authority, mistrust/hatred of police should be the default assumption for any rational citizen. Indeed, our entire society is founded upon the idea that authority figures are not immune to corruption and should be regarded with suspicion.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Corolinth wrote:
Given that throughout the history of the United States, police have repeatedly shown a willingness to abuse their power and authority, mistrust/hatredof police should be the default assumption for any rational citizen.


This.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Corolinth wrote:
Given that throughout the history of the United States, police have repeatedly shown a willingness to abuse their power and authority, mistrust/hatred of police should be the default assumption for any rational citizen. Indeed, our entire society is founded upon the idea that authority figures are not immune to corruption and should be regarded with suspicion.


Of course authority figures aren't immune to corruption. The position here seems to be that all but a few police officers are corrupt at best, and actively sadistic at worst. They're just looking for ANY reason to throw random people in prison no matter what. If you're chatting with some random guy on the street that you met fifteen minutes ago and he asks your name, do you refuse to give it to him? Of course you don't trust this guy you just met, but you're still going to give him your name. Refusing to give cops your name demonstrates rampant paranoia that goes far beyond mistrust.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:27 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Funny - post in a gun forum by a former leo defending the forums critique of a specific incident against an LEO saying that most cops are good cops:

"I was in law enforcement. Wore a bright shiny silver badge, niffy cool handcuffs, and two guns. What I learned in those SEVEN (7) years is this. To be a good cop is a falsehood. There are no good cops. There are only those who are less likely to be criminally minded and abusive. The only people I saw who make it in Law Enforcement are the worst backstabbing, lying, dirty, rotten scum our society has. I learned not to fear the criminal but to fear those whom I worked with. Hiding/shredding reports, planting evidence, beating those who couldn't even defend themselves, stomping the **** out of those who couldn't afford a speaking voice, controlling the illegal drug trade, and putting men in prison whom they didn't like or feared.

Thats what I learned in 7 years. Good, honest, decent, hard working people can't make it in law enforcement as a career because they are not corrupt enough. Plain and Simple!

Cops? I was one and I wouldn't trust a cop to feed my hogs slop.

CL"

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:42 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Xequecal wrote:
shuyung wrote:
So the entirety of your stance on why this gentleman (and, we can assume, anyone else) should remain in custody for refusal to provide verbal (or better) identification regardless of fulfillment of sentences applied for convictions, is that he might be guilty of something else somewhere? Have I got that right?


If you refuse to testify in court, you can be locked up until you agree to testify. This is true even if you're almost certainly innocent of any other crime other than refusing to testify.

I do not see how this is any different. If you don't identify yourself, you can be held until you do. Giving your name is not self-incrimination, so there is no reason why the police/government can't require you to identify yourself.

At your own trial? No, you can't be compelled to testify.

Xequecal wrote:
If you're chatting with some random guy on the street that you met fifteen minutes ago and he asks your name, do you refuse to give it to him? Of course you don't trust this guy you just met, but you're still going to give him your name. Refusing to give cops your name demonstrates rampant paranoia that goes far beyond mistrust.

If said random guy was going to immediately research whether I had committed any wrongdoings with the intent to incarcerate or otherwise punish me, no I wouldn't give this person my name. Come to think of it, I probably wouldn't give some random guy on the street my name anyway.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
So now we are going to extend the definition of "Contempt of Court" to include people who won't give their name during an arrest?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
That appears to be what we're doing.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
I have to ask, what makes the judge more trustworthy than the police officer? Why can he demand you give him information while a police officer can't? They're both government agents.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:06 pm 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
I'd go with the fact that it's open court and there are witnesses to, and records of, the judge's actions.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Xequecal wrote:
I have to ask, what makes the judge more trustworthy than the police officer?


Accountability, education, setting, circumstances.

Quote:
Why can he demand you give him information while a police officer can't? They're both government agents.


Because that's what the law allows.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 2:57 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Corolinth wrote:
Given that throughout the history of the United States, police have repeatedly shown a willingness to abuse their power and authority, mistrust/hatred of police should be the default assumption for any rational citizen. Indeed, our entire society is founded upon the idea that authority figures are not immune to corruption and should be regarded with suspicion.


Since none of your given is a given, we can pretty much ignore this as another incidence of you trolling.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 2:58 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
There really should be laws requiring you to properly identify yourself once you are arrested upon probable cause. Not identifying yourself is not a right, nor does it pertain to any right against self-incrimination.

So, indeed, there is no such law?

Under what grounds, then, was he held?


Depends on the state as to whether it was a law. He was held, as far as I can tell, to determine if there was a valid warrant for him.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
So you're agreeing with shuyung.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Elmarnieh wrote:
Müs wrote:
Meh. I'd be much more on board with "Being a douchebag to a cop" laws. Their jobs are hard enough without people trying to "stick it to the man".



Ahh yes special powers for a special class of privileged enforcers of our betters?

Excellent - why didn't someone ever think of this before?

Don't cops have to provide ID when asked for it? I believe they do. Pretty much evens things out, right?

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm
Posts: 5716
Taskiss wrote:
Elmarnieh wrote:
Müs wrote:
Meh. I'd be much more on board with "Being a douchebag to a cop" laws. Their jobs are hard enough without people trying to "stick it to the man".



Ahh yes special powers for a special class of privileged enforcers of our betters?

Excellent - why didn't someone ever think of this before?

Don't cops have to provide ID when asked for it? I believe they do. Pretty much evens things out, right?


Not really, since they are on duty. If they're walking down the street off duty, do they have to show me their ID if I ask? If not, it's not even.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Not really, since they are on duty. If they're walking down the street off duty, do they have to show me their ID if I ask? If not, it's not even.

The guy wasn't just walking down the street, he was committing a crime. He put the whole thing in motion and because of that, both he and the cops were obligated to provide ID.

Seems to work out even to me.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:27 pm 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
He was accused of a crime.

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Taskiss wrote:
Arathain Kelvar wrote:
Not really, since they are on duty. If they're walking down the street off duty, do they have to show me their ID if I ask? If not, it's not even.

The guy wasn't just walking down the street, he was committing a crime. He put the whole thing in motion and because of that, both he and the cops were obligated to provide ID.

Seems to work out even to me.


He hasn't committed a crime until he is convicted in a fair court of law of proper jurisdiction, hence not you.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
That's irrelevant, I'm not arguing if the guy was committing a crime, I'm saying that the guy put a situation in motion that resulted in both he and the cops being obligated to provide identification to each other, so any argument about this proving that cops are a privileged special class because someone has to provide their name when they're arrested is bullshit. They're equally obligated.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 5:43 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Mexico reports an official unemployment rate of 4.9%...

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:04 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Rynar wrote:
Mexico reports an official unemployment rate of 4.9%...


And New Zealand was the first major nation to have universal suffrage. In 1893 it became legal for all male and female citizens of New Zealand to vote.

Oh wait, you're not just posting non-sequitur facts, you're posting in the wrong thread. My mistake. ;)

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:22 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Talya wrote:
Rynar wrote:
Mexico reports an official unemployment rate of 4.9%...


And New Zealand was the first major nation to have universal suffrage. In 1893 it became legal for all male and female citizens of New Zealand to vote.

Oh wait, you're not just posting non-sequitur facts, you're posting in the wrong thread. My mistake. ;)


Ha!

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 282 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group