Foamy wrote:
So just to make sure I understand the majority sentiment...
The salesperson should in no way ply the customer for information regarding their purchase (especially in the case of computer upgrades), they should merely hand said customer a product and assume that it will be compatible.
Yes, unless specifically asked.
Foamy wrote:
That is what a salesperson should do? Really?
Yes, unless specifically asked.
Foamy wrote:
So, a salesperson for a company that sells sprinkler systems should in no way make sure of what the customer is intending to protect with said sprinkler system before selling it to them. So he can sell a water based sprinkler system to a company that wants to protect their server room, because, hey...the customer should know exactly what they want and need.
Yes, that is exactly what the salesperson should do...unless specifically asked.
Foamy wrote:
To reiterate...
A salesperson should IN NO WAY, make sure that the product they are selling will fit the needs of the customer?
Unless specifically asked by the customer to ensure that the customer's lack of knowledge is not a stumbling block, yes.
Foamy wrote:
Please, I am dying to know if that is really what those who have responded here think.
When I sold board games and someone picked up Seafarers of Catane, even though it has a label on it saying "This is not a standalone game. You need to own Settlers of Catan to play this", I was in no way as a salesperson/representative of the store, needed to forewarn them of the fact that they need something else to play the expansion?
Nope.
Foamy wrote:
That is a salesperson's job. That is what they do. They SELL things and make sure they do not come back for a return or a customer satisfaction issue because they didn't do what they should have done at the customer's first visit to their establishment.
I'll admit that the customer should have some knowledge of what they are buying. A smart consumer is an informed consumer. But in the absence of that knowledge, it would serve the salesperson and by extension, the retailer, well to make sure their customer gets what they need the first time.
Come on, I am sure I am not the only person who has worked retail here and knows this.
If I go in and purchase a case for my iPhone 4, the salesperson should not have to ensure that I do in fact have an iPhone 4 (and not a 3GS, or 3G, or god forbid a 1st gen). However, if a person comes in and says "I'm an idiot, I have no knowledge of the technical workings of what I need, please help me solve my problem,"
then yes, the salesperson should have both the knowledge and the people skills to handle that from beginning to end. But baby-sitting the client and double-checking each and every little thing? If a salesperson wants to do so, fine. But I see no responsibility or need for the salesperson to interfere with the client when not invited to do so.