The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:04 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-3 ... erger.html

Quote:
The U.S. government sued to block AT&T Inc. (T)’s proposed $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA Inc., saying the deal would “substantially lessen competition” in the wireless market. AT&T shares fell as much as 5 percent.
In the complaint filed today in federal court in Washington, the U.S. is seeking a declaration that Dallas-based AT&T’s takeover of T-Mobile, a unit of Deutsche Telekom AG (DTE), would violate U.S. antitrust law. The U.S. also asked for a court order blocking any arrangement implementing the deal.
“AT&T’s elimination of T-Mobile as an independent, low- priced rival would remove a significant competitive force from the market,” the U.S. said in its filing.
Should regulators reject the deal, which would create the biggest U.S. wireless carrier, AT&T would have to pay Deutsche Telekom $3 billion in cash. It would also provide T-Mobile USA with wireless spectrum in some regions and reduced charges for calls into AT&T’s network, for a total package valued at as much as $7 billion, Deutsche Telekom said this month.
Philipp Schindera, a spokesman at Bonn-based Deutsche Telekom, declined to immediately comment on the filing. Jessica Smith, a Justice Department spokeswoman, declined to comment on the suit. Michael Balmoris, an AT&T spokesman, didn’t immediately respond to an e-mail and phone calls seeking comment.
Shares Drop
AT&T fell $1.02, or 3.4 percent, to $28.60 at 10:55 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading after declining as much as $1.49. Deutsche Telekom American depositary receipts dropped as much as 6.4 percent, to $12.93.
The purchase of Bellevue, Washington-based T-Mobile would combine the second- and fourth-largest carriers to create a new market leader ahead of No. 1 Verizon Wireless. The new company would have dwarfed current No. 3 carrier Sprint Nextel Corp., which argued against the deal. Overland Park, Kansas-based Sprint’s shares jumped as much as 9.9 percent.
Some U.S. lawmakers have said the deal may reduce competition and raise consumer costs. The Federal Communications Commission has given itself more time to study new data presented by AT&T.
Economic Models
AT&T in a July 25 filing at the FCC submitted new economic models that it said showed the merger would lower prices and increase service in large metropolitan markets. The models offer “further detailed support” for arguments that the merger will lessen strains on the company’s wireless network, lower costs and increase quality, AT&T said in the filing.
“Given the size of the cancellation fee that was negotiated into his agreement, AT&T has the incentive to fight,” said Andrew Gavil, a law professor at Howard University in Washington. “The fact that the Justice Department is challenging the deal doesn’t mean they won’t negotiate a resolution at some point.”
The case is U.S. v. AT&T Inc., 11-01560, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Washington).
To contact the reporter on this story: Tom Schoenberg in Washington at tschoenberg@bloomberg.net

Any thoughts on this? I think it is probably a good thing if they are blocked from merging. Without as much competition, they would have less of a reason to improve infrastructure and innovate.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Lol. "may reduce competition and raise consumer costs."

I'm rooting against the merger, as I'm quite satisfied with TMO as my carrier. Now, if only they'd build/upgrade about 2 more towers on the I-75 corridor at the north end of their Dayton HSPDA+ coverage, I'd literally have zero complaints.

In contrast, I switched away from ATT because of their data plan policies, lack of no-contract service, and relative cost.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Last edited by Kaffis Mark V on Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
I think if I were a betting man, I would probably be betting on the merger going through.

This just starts the discussion on 'concessions'.

Ultimately, the DOJ (Attorney General's office) answers directly to Barack Obama, who is about to start doing anything and everything he can to get re-elected.

The final decision will be more about Obama getting re-elected than it will be about whats best for consumers...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Also, I find it amusing that AT&T's arguing that it will increase the quality of their service. Well, duh, you're buying T-Mobile to get their bandwith. But what will it do to T-Mobile customers? And, if the AT&T customers are dissatisfied with the quality available to them through your own offerings, they're free to switch TO T-Mobile. That's the "reduce competition" part...

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
I guess I should go on record saying that I'm ultimately very surprised by this filing. I never thought this would happen.

And while it is encouraging, it doesn't mean the merger won't go through. The DOJ has just filed suit to stop the merger in it's current state. The merger could very well still go through. It would just mean that AT&T would have to make some as-yet-undetermined concessions (which was pretty much a given anyway).

I'm fairly pessimistic, and am camped firmly in the "I'll believe it when I see it" camp.

Also, if the merger doesn't go through, there is still a cloud hanging over T-Mobile USA, as Duetch Telecom has shown that they no longer have interest in their US entity. When they acquired VoiceStream in 2001, they milked it of all of their cash profits until the economy turned and the company was no longer profitable. Now they want to divest, rather than re-invest or at least just weather the storm.

Ultimately T-Mobile is not in any condition to compete nationally with AT&T on a 'number of customers' basis. It's very difficult to run a nationally competitive network with a fraction of the customer base.

The only other merger partner would be Sprint, which is in a similar situation. Unfortunately, from a technology standpoint the two companies (T-Mobile USA and Sprint) are far from compatible. There might be some benefit to merging customer bases into one larger pool to save a little money on billing, etc... the chaos that would ensue would dramatically slow any positive momentum either company has in terms of advancing technologically or geographically.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
This statement contains more common sense than I can remember coming from any Federal Government Agency...ever...

If they stick to this, I will honestly be impressed.

As quoted from this article..

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-3 ... erger.html

Department of Justice wrote:
AT&T had not demonstrated that the proposed transaction promised any efficiencies that would be sufficient to outweigh the transaction’s substantial adverse impact on competition and consumers,” the department said in the statement. “AT&T could obtain substantially the same network enhancements that it claims will come from the transaction if it simply invested in its own network without eliminating a close competitor.”


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Lol. Wow. In fact, it would get more network enhancements if it did that, because it wouldn't be burdening the more robust network with more users at the same time.

Add capacity to the national infrastructure, overall quality gets better. Reorganize who owns what, and you just average out the quality, making some better and others worse.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
I suspect AT&T got wind of this announcement yesterday, and pre-emptively released a statement saying that the merger would "Create 5000 NEW jobs"... this on a day when our beloved President is set to announce his 'jobs' plan....

This was released basically at midnight last night

http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=2 ... |financial

AT&T News Release wrote:
AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) today committed that after closing its proposed merger with T-Mobile USA, it will bring back 5,000 wireless call center jobs to the United States that today are outsourced to other countries.

Today’s commitment results from AT&T developing detailed analysis focused specifically on identifying opportunities with the T-Mobile merger to bring good-paying wireless call center jobs back to the United States.

In addition to bringing jobs back, AT&T committed that the merger will not result in any job losses for U.S.-based wireless call center employees of T-Mobile USA or AT&T, who are on the payroll when the merger closes.

The 5,000 new wireless call center jobs at AT&T will offer among the nation’s most highly competitive wages and benefits. AT&T, which has not yet determined where in the U.S. the new jobs will be located, is the nation’s largest employer of full-time union employees and the only unionized major U.S. wireless carrier.

“At a time when many Americans are struggling and our economy faces significant challenges, we’re pleased that the T-Mobile merger allows us to bring 5,000 jobs back to the United States and significantly increase our investment here,” said Randall Stephenson, AT&T Chairman and CEO. “This merger and today’s commitment are good for our employees, our customers and our country.”

Today’s announcement represents the largest commitment by an individual American company to bring jobs back to the U.S. since the economic crisis began in 2008.

Also, AT&T has committed as part of the T-Mobile merger to increase its U.S. infrastructure investment by more than $8 billion. According to an analysis by the Economic Policy Institute that was commissioned by the Communications Workers of America, AT&T’s increased investment is estimated to produce up to approximately 96,000 new U.S. jobs.

AT&T said today’s jobs commitment does not change its previous guidance on the expected overall merger synergies.

Beyond the jobs created, AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile USA provides a fast, efficient and certain solution to the impending exhaustion of wireless spectrum in many markets, which limits both companies’ ability to meet the ongoing explosive customer demand for mobile broadband. The uniquely complementary nature of AT&T and T-Mobile’s network assets will allow the combined company to add wireless network capacity – the functional equivalent of new spectrum – sooner than any other alternative.

This additional wireless network capacity will enable AT&T to offer better service — fewer dropped and blocked calls, and faster data speeds. Plus, the economic scale, additional spectrum and other benefits resulting from the merger will enable AT&T to deliver high-speed 4G LTE mobile broadband service to 97 percent of the U.S. population, or 55 million more Americans than it would without the merger. Reaching 97 percent of the population with LTE will create a much more extensive and robust mobile broadband platform that will fuel growth and investment throughout the country.

The benefits of the AT&T and T-Mobile merger have been recognized by numerous elected officials throughout the country, including 27 governors, more than 100 mayors, 11 state attorneys general, 79 Democratic Members of the U.S. House of Representatives and more than 150 chambers of commerce from 40 states, as well as a dozen labor unions and dozens of high-tech companies, such as Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo! and Oracle


And here is a link to the full text of the DOJ statement announcing the filing, which was released this morning (after the AT&T "Jobs" announcement).

http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/Augu ... -1118.html

Edit: And here is the LOL-Worthy disclaimer at the bottom of that AT&T press release

AT&T wrote:
Cautionary Language Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Information set forth in this news release contains financial estimates and other forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially. In addition to these factors, there are risks and uncertainties associated with the T-Mobile business, the pendency of the T-Mobile acquisition and the ability to realize the benefits of the integration of the T-Mobile business. A discussion of factors that may affect future results is contained in AT&T's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. AT&T disclaims any obligation to update or revise statements contained in this news release based on new information or otherwise.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:59 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
I'm rooting against the merger, as I'm quite satisfied with TMO as my carrier.


This

Oh and Sprint can drink a jar of monkey spunk

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:01 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
Kaffis Mark V wrote:
Also, I find it amusing that AT&T's arguing that it will increase the quality of their service. Well, duh, you're buying T-Mobile to get their bandwith. But what will it do to T-Mobile customers? And, if the AT&T customers are dissatisfied with the quality available to them through your own offerings, they're free to switch TO T-Mobile. That's the "reduce competition" part...


Well, since T-Mo's handsets will no longer work after the merger (AT&T is dedicating all of TMo's spectrum to data), we'll all need to get new phones. I'm happy with T-mobile as a company, but it's frustrating that my signal sucks any time I've got a roof over my head. They're stuck with a bad spectrum.

I want this merger to go through only because it'll probably get me a new phone on the cheap.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
Well, to be clear, there would be no 'hard cut'.... they would migrate users by attrition (when your contract is up for renewal or you upgrade your handset).

Once you are on AT&T's network you may or may not still have your indoor coverage problem, but you will certainly be on the same crappy, iPhone infested network that all of the existing AT&T customers are on.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:21 pm 
Offline
Near Ground
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 6782
Location: Chattanooga, TN
T-Mobile was great, but they don't have the iPhone.

Ergo, I have AT&T. Haven't been terribly displeased with them.

The only problem I had with T-Mobile (outside of their lack of iPhones) was Lenas' aforementioned indoor coverage problem. Which was pretty seriously, but...*shrug*


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:25 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
I'll give it to T-mobile, though, their $49.99 unlimited plan is the ****.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Lenas wrote:
I'll give it to T-mobile, though, their $49.99 unlimited plan is the ****.

Yeah. Let's hope that regulators are using the TMO side as the benchmark for improving service quality and value, not the AT&T one.

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:34 pm 
Offline
pbp Hack
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 7585
My question is still the same. Does this mean that I can pick up my phone in my parents house and have 3g at home now? If the answer is no, then I might go Verizon next spring.

_________________
I prefer to think of them as "Fighting evil in another dimension"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:48 am 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
I do not have the indoor coverage issue. :-\ I went to T-Mobile because:
1. AT&T can die in a gorram fire right in their faces and then they can take their neighbors with them. I would rather use a damned pair of tin cans and string than AT&T.
2. Sprint sucks for coverage in my area (as in none for close to 2 miles around my home, despite their coverage map.) And I was paying $196 a month for 1500 minutes, unlimited texting and data.
3. Verizon may be good service... but I would not know. for 3 iphones with unlimited minutes and messages and only 2Gb of data per month... Total Monthly Access Charges $322.94
4. Rates: with T-Mobile; I am paying $195 a month for 3 lines for unlimited minutes, texting, and data, and once I hit 250 Mb of 4G, it slows to 3G... if I want more 4G I can pay 10 bucks per phone for 2 Gb of 4G and unlimited 3G.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
Telecommunications Family Tree (from the Wall Street Journal)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... TMAP032811
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:03 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
AT&T isn't "surprised and disappointed" by this lawsuit, they're still sore over the one they lost in 1984.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:49 pm
Posts: 3455
Location: St. Louis, MO
Conceded in '82, but yeah. In hindsight, they should have just divested the AT&T Computer Systems part.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:08 am
Posts: 6465
Location: The Lab
AT&T's "Plan" to save the merger...

http://news.yahoo.com/t-determined-save ... 25701.html
(Emphasis mine)
Mashable wrote:
AT&T has a plan to save the $39 billion T-Mobile acquisition blocked by the U.S. government, reports Reuters quoting sources familiar with the matter.

AT&T's new plan has two parts: First, it will pledge to keep T-Mobile's subscription plans and rates at current levels. Second, it will need to sell off up to 25% of T-Mobile's business, potentially including airwaves and customers.

Some analysts doubt AT&T can pull off the merger. Former antitrust enforcer Bob Doyle toldReuters it would be difficult to find a buyer for parts of T-Mobile's business in the U.S., as a sale to either Verizon or Sprint would also cause antitrust lawsuits.

Should AT&T fail to reach a settlement, it will need to pay T-Mobile's owner Deutsche Telekom approximately $6 billion.

In a recent Mashable poll, 66.49% of readers said the U.S. government was right to block the AT&T/T-Mobile merger, 25.53% thought the government should butt out and 7.97% were unsure.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Maybe they should invest in making their products better instead of eliminating competitors... this really show you what their business model is focused on.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:47 pm 
Offline
Grrr... Eat your oatmeal!!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 5073
Mashable wrote:
AT&T's new plan has two parts: First, it will pledge to keep T-Mobile's subscription plans and rates at current levels. Second, it will need to sell off up to 25% of T-Mobile's business, potentially including airwaves and customers.


There is no way to hope enough for them to find a fire large enough to die in.

_________________
Darksiege
Traveller, Calé, Whisperer
Lead me not into temptation; for I know a shortcut


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:40 am
Posts: 4281
I love how the telecom market is correcting itself... right into the worst case scenario for consumers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 1:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
I think consumerist rage will be so great that this won't ever go through. Also it's a great way for people in government to feel like they're making a good difference. I'd put my money on it being blocked or mostly blocked.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 2:14 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
And now Sprint files suit


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 186 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group