The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:21 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 629 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
My biggest question for those complaining about that 1% that have money is, what difference does it make?

Bill Gates' fortune doesn't diminish my life at all.

I just don't know why it's an issue.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Taskiss wrote:
My biggest question for those complaining about that 1% that have money is, what difference does it make?

Bill Gates' fortune doesn't diminish my life at all.

I just don't know why it's an issue.


In their view when the rich get richer, everyone else necessarily gets poorer in a zero sum game. However, it's a false dilemma due to wealth creation. An example is someone borrowing a saw from a rich guy to cut down a tree and build a chair. The new chair is created wealth.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 9:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Taskiss wrote:
My biggest question for those complaining about that 1% that have money is, what difference does it make?

Bill Gates' fortune doesn't diminish my life at all.

I just don't know why it's an issue.


Because the current economic system in unfair and affords them preferential treatment from start to finish. They (the ones who make money from capital gains) pay a lower tax rate than everyone else, don't have to pay payroll taxes like everyone else, and in many cases are basically legally entitled to your money no matter what they do. Don't like Bank of America's policies? Well, if you decide not to bank there they get your money anyway because they're too big to fail. If I can't pay my debts I get my stuff repossessed and get thrown into the street. If Citigroup can't pay its debts, I have to pay them. Oh and the people who ran Citigroup into the situation where I have to pay their debts get >$100 million golden parachutes that I also have to pay for.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 10:36 pm 
Offline
Peanut Gallery
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:40 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Bat Country
Tax rates aren't what keep people poor and the rich livin' large.

_________________
"...the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?" -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 10:46 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Xequecal wrote:
Taskiss wrote:
My biggest question for those complaining about that 1% that have money is, what difference does it make?

Bill Gates' fortune doesn't diminish my life at all.

I just don't know why it's an issue.


Because the current economic system in unfair and affords them preferential treatment from start to finish. They (the ones who make money from capital gains) pay a lower tax rate than everyone else, don't have to pay payroll taxes like everyone else, and in many cases are basically legally entitled to your money no matter what they do. Don't like Bank of America's policies? Well, if you decide not to bank there they get your money anyway because they're too big to fail. If I can't pay my debts I get my stuff repossessed and get thrown into the street. If Citigroup can't pay its debts, I have to pay them. Oh and the people who ran Citigroup into the situation where I have to pay their debts get >$100 million golden parachutes that I also have to pay for.


See, this type of logic is everything that is wrong with modern liberalism. What, exactly can one purchase where the fee is based on a percentage of their income? It isn't the percentage that matters, it's the amount. And the amount of taxes paid by the wealthy is staggering. The top 1% of all earners pay more than 40% of all taxes collected. I do agree with you that we should lower the amount of taxes paid by middle-income earners.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Xequecal wrote:
Taskiss wrote:
My biggest question for those complaining about that 1% that have money is, what difference does it make?

Bill Gates' fortune doesn't diminish my life at all.

I just don't know why it's an issue.


Because the current economic system in unfair and affords them preferential treatment from start to finish. They (the ones who make money from capital gains) pay a lower tax rate than everyone else, don't have to pay payroll taxes like everyone else, and in many cases are basically legally entitled to your money no matter what they do. Don't like Bank of America's policies? Well, if you decide not to bank there they get your money anyway because they're too big to fail. If I can't pay my debts I get my stuff repossessed and get thrown into the street. If Citigroup can't pay its debts, I have to pay them. Oh and the people who ran Citigroup into the situation where I have to pay their debts get >$100 million golden parachutes that I also have to pay for.


If you already own $5 million, you don't have to pay taxes on it. If you stick all your money in a mattress you don't pay taxes on it. Sure capital gains tax is 15%, but to get the capital in the first place you need to pay a large tax rate just like everybody else. People who earn an income pay taxes on that income and the rate is higher for large earners.

If there is a better system than this, could you please suggest it? I partly attribute things we take for granted like the 75 - 80 year life expectancy, the Internet, etc. to capitalism where investments do not get punished with heavy taxes.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Like I've suggested many times, we could have a flat income tax that applies to all forms of income and is set at the same rate for everyone.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Xequecal wrote:
Taskiss wrote:
My biggest question for those complaining about that 1% that have money is, what difference does it make?

Bill Gates' fortune doesn't diminish my life at all.

I just don't know why it's an issue.


Because the current economic system in unfair and affords them preferential treatment from start to finish. They (the ones who make money from capital gains) pay a lower tax rate than everyone else, don't have to pay payroll taxes like everyone else, and in many cases are basically legally entitled to your money no matter what they do. Don't like Bank of America's policies? Well, if you decide not to bank there they get your money anyway because they're too big to fail. If I can't pay my debts I get my stuff repossessed and get thrown into the street. If Citigroup can't pay its debts, I have to pay them. Oh and the people who ran Citigroup into the situation where I have to pay their debts get >$100 million golden parachutes that I also have to pay for.
The issues you highlight are due to legislative policy for the most part, and while I don't think they're sound policy, they don't diminish my life a bit.

Entitlement programs are the much more costly, as far as a drain on the taxes I pay, and even they don't diminish my life. It's not really a matter of what's fair, unless one insists that taxes aren't fair...but I realize they're part of a social contract that I get more benefit from than diminished by. And, in relation to that social contract, the contribution from that 1% who are being protested against is greater by far than any other economic demographic, so I don't see any lack of fairness from that.

I guess your argument just doesn't make much sense to me.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 1532
Taskiss wrote:
Best I can tell, they want socialism to replace capitalism.

http://occupywallst.org/article/September_Revolution/



Man, is it just me, or does that guy, use commas, way too much?

_________________
Ron Paul 2012


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:26 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
I, think, its, just: you.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:29 am 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
Socialism is the long and painful transition between capitalism and capitalism.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Corolinth wrote:
Socialism is the long and painful transition between capitalism and capitalism.


And Lolbertarianism is the fantasy of people with cushy lifestyles in a stable society.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:20 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
So what's Colbertarianism?

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Xequecal wrote:
Because the current economic system in unfair and affords them preferential treatment from start to finish. They (the ones who make money from capital gains) pay a lower tax rate than everyone else, don't have to pay payroll taxes like everyone else, and in many cases are basically legally entitled to your money no matter what they do. Don't like Bank of America's policies? Well, if you decide not to bank there they get your money anyway because they're too big to fail. If I can't pay my debts I get my stuff repossessed and get thrown into the street. If Citigroup can't pay its debts, I have to pay them. Oh and the people who ran Citigroup into the situation where I have to pay their debts get >$100 million golden parachutes that I also have to pay for.

1) You are under the mistaken impression that the 1% were all born with their money and don't actually work. While a typical liberal characterization, doesn't match reality. Some are, sure, but in any given listing of the worlds richest, a majority are self made by their own efforts. So the "them", or the 1% being used by yourself and these protestors, aren't deriving all their income from capital gains, so the 1% aren't paying only 15% taxes.

2) Hammering capital gains income hurts which class the most?

3) Even if it were true that the 1% were born with that wealth and only ever gained income via returns on investment, so only paid 15% taxes, that would still have them paying a higher final tax rate than 50%+ of the US population. That 50% had better count their stars the other 48% don't started occupying Welfare.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:14 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Average withholding over a year for anyone who makes $22,000 or more is enough to cap yearly contributions in an Roth IRA until you're 50.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Khross wrote:
Average withholding over a year for anyone who makes $22,000 or more is enough to cap yearly contributions in an Roth IRA until you're 50.


The problem with saving money with a low income is that it takes a lot of work to live so frugally, and you have to deal with constant feelings of temptation from abstaining from consumer products, restaurants, and so on.


Last edited by Lex Luthor on Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:24 am 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Lex Luthor wrote:
Khross wrote:
Average withholding over a year for anyone who makes $22,000 or more is enough to cap yearly contributions in an Roth IRA until you're 50.


The problem with saving money with a low income is that it takes a lot of work to live so frugally, and you have to deal with constant feelings of temptation from abstaining from consumer products.


Oh noz! I might want something I can't have? For shame.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Hannibal wrote:
Lex Luthor wrote:
Khross wrote:
Average withholding over a year for anyone who makes $22,000 or more is enough to cap yearly contributions in an Roth IRA until you're 50.


The problem with saving money with a low income is that it takes a lot of work to live so frugally, and you have to deal with constant feelings of temptation from abstaining from consumer products.


Oh noz! I might want something I can't have? For shame.


Well you can have it if you don't save.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:37 am 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Sure you can, just wait till the government forces loose credit rules in the interest of stimulating the economy.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 2169
Khross wrote:
Average withholding over a year for anyone who makes $22,000 or more is enough to cap yearly contributions in an Roth IRA until you're 50.

For an individual with no dependents, I agree, its doable.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Xequecal wrote:
Like I've suggested many times, we could have a flat income tax that applies to all forms of income and is set at the same rate for everyone.

Why is the obsession with income?

Why not a flat sales tax?

Why is it we need to take our cut out of "success," and not "lifestyle"?

Taxing spending means that if you budget well and live frugally, you're not penalized for saving and retiring early if you're successful. Taxing income means that even if you're successful, it's harder to save. And then, if people have their way and you made wise investments with your savings, we'll tax you again after you retire, too!

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:07 am 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
It's a delusion, Kaffis. The individuals obsessed with taxing income and wealth have this delusional notion that because I'm rich, they aren't. It's completely unfathomable to Xequecal or Monty or TheRiov that I got where I am through my own efforts. I must have, somehow, disproportionately benefited from some ephemeral and amorphous social contract to save the money and acquire the things I have. They've been telling me this for close to a decade now.

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:10 am 
Offline
adorabalicious
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:54 am
Posts: 5094
Maybe it is because your huggalubadoozly?

_________________
"...but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom." - De Tocqueville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:18 am 
Offline
Rihannsu Commander

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:31 am
Posts: 4709
Location: Cincinnati OH
How did I get drawn into this?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
If you create something or provide a service through your labor, and trade it to someone else for money, then it was a fair trade. You were not gifted anything by society.

I might have said differently in the past but it was because I didn't think it through.

edit:

I think what can be questioned is whether you really own your own 'capital' and the product of your efforts. I mean capital in the sense of if you had 10 slaves, those can be considered capital that produce something which you then own. Your self is just another form.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 629 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 26  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 290 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group