The Glade 4.0

"Turn the lights down, the party just got wilder."
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 6:52 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 1:32 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
Steve Job's heirs will likely be forced to sell off their stakes in both Apple and Disney in order to avoid the hefty capital gains taxes. What this means for Apple is a possible hostile take-over.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2811135/posts?page=3

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 1:53 pm 
Offline
Web Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
Posts: 8248
Location: The Tunt Mansion
His wife is a smart woman. Like the article says, unless she feels like sitting on boards of Apple/Disney, no reason not to sell the stocks.

Question: Did his $1/yr salary have anything to do with this?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:02 pm 
Offline
Not a F'n Boy Scout
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 5202
No, this has to do with the changing tax laws surrounding capital gains. Totally seperate tax issue. The real news here is the shake up this could potentially lead to at Apple, with more than 5 1/2 million shares of stock being traded on the open market.

_________________
Quote:
19 Yet she became more and more promiscuous as she recalled the days of her youth, when she was a prostitute in Egypt. 20 There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

Ezekiel 23:19-20 


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:42 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
I don't get how people can have $1/yr salaries without falling afoul of minimum wage laws.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:00 pm 
Offline
Lucky Bastard
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:11 am
Posts: 2341
I never understood what the point of $1 salaries is supposed to be.

_________________
This must be Thursday. I could never get the hang of Thursdays.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:06 pm 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
It's easy when the person being paid $1/yr doesn't need the job or the money. The point of it all was that Apple needed him more than he needed Apple. Steve Jobs didn't give a **** about the money. Apple was his company. He was taking it back, and nobody was going to stop him.

Minimum wage laws are to prevent children from being exploited in the workplace. There isn't a single court in the United States that would have ruled that Steve Jobs was being exploited. He knew exactly what he was doing.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:36 am
Posts: 3083
Diamondeye wrote:
I don't get how people can have $1/yr salaries without falling afoul of minimum wage laws.

Certain types of salaried positions (basically, white-collar professional / executive positions) are exempt from minimum wage requirements.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Also interns can be paid $0.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 5:25 pm 
Offline
Bull Moose
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:36 pm
Posts: 7507
Location: Last Western Stop of the Pony Express
In situations like that he receives much in the form of benefits and stock options. The $1/year is makes the point that he is an employee and sets off the personal income tax he would pay if the company paid him in cash. He made much more than any of us make when you cost out the benefits and services, and especially the stock options, the company paid for him.

_________________
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. B. Franklin

"A mind needs books like a sword needs a whetstone." -- Tyrion Lannister, A Game of Thrones


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 5:44 pm 
Offline
The Dancing Cat
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 9354
Location: Ohio
RangerDave wrote:
Diamondeye wrote:
I don't get how people can have $1/yr salaries without falling afoul of minimum wage laws.

Certain types of salaried positions (basically, white-collar professional / executive positions) are exempt from minimum wage requirements.

This, that is why they are called exempt.

_________________
Quote:
In comic strips the person on the left always speaks first. - George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
Posts: 9412
Micheal wrote:
In situations like that he receives much in the form of benefits and stock options. The $1/year is makes the point that he is an employee and sets off the personal income tax he would pay if the company paid him in cash. He made much more than any of us make when you cost out the benefits and services, and especially the stock options, the company paid for him.

Steve Jobs is the 1%, using compensation trickery not available to us mere mortals to avoid paying high marginal income tax rates!

_________________
"Aaaah! Emotions are weird!" - Amdee
"... Mirrorshades prevent the forces of normalcy from realizing that one is crazed and possibly dangerous. They are the symbol of the sun-staring visionary, the biker, the rocker, the policeman, and similar outlaws." - Bruce Sterling, preface to Mirrorshades


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 11:22 pm 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Maybe this will force a discussion on the estate rape that happens when someone dies. I just love that the goverment can walk up and say, "sorry for your loss, just cut us a check for half their stuff and we will let you grieve in peace".

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:03 am
Posts: 4922
Hannibal wrote:
Maybe this will force a discussion on the estate rape that happens when someone dies. I just love that the goverment can walk up and say, "sorry for your loss, just cut us a check for half their stuff and we will let you grieve in peace".


I think right now it's not in vogue to care about the monetary grievances of the 1%.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 3:13 am 
Offline
I got nothin.
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 11160
Location: Arafys, AKA El Müso Guapo!
Lex Luthor wrote:
Hannibal wrote:
Maybe this will force a discussion on the estate rape that happens when someone dies. I just love that the goverment can walk up and say, "sorry for your loss, just cut us a check for half their stuff and we will let you grieve in peace".


I think right now it's not in vogue to care about the monetary grievances of the 1%.


This. I don't give a **** about the $800M monetary woes of multi billionaires.

_________________
Image
Holy shitsnacks!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:05 am 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
I don't either. I do, however, give a **** that the government thinks someone's death is an excuse to pick at their estate like vultures.

Of all the various sorts of tax, the estate tax is the one I find most appalling. Other sorts of taxes I can see arguments for the merits of one way or the other, but the estate tax is vile in a moral sense.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:48 am 
Offline
Has a plan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:51 pm
Posts: 1584
Diamondeye wrote:
I don't either. I do, however, give a **** that the government thinks someone's death is an excuse to pick at their estate like vultures.

Of all the various sorts of tax, the estate tax is the one I find most appalling. Other sorts of taxes I can see arguments for the merits of one way or the other, but the estate tax is vile in a moral sense.



Exactly. I don't care about what other people have or don't have. What I care about are simple things. The fact that the goverment feels entitled to a large sum of an estate just by virtue of the owner passing is wrong. I can't believe that people still get caught up in the class envy bull####. Dammit just because someone dies with two pennies to rub together doesn't mean that the goverment should get one of them.

_________________
A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ~ John Stuart Mill


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:59 am
Posts: 3879
Location: 63368
Just to play devils advocate, what has one's descendants done to deserve one's estate that the government hasn't done?

I would prefer to be able to direct the disposition of my estate without penalty or interference from the government... but that's my only gripe. I don't think my kids deserve a thing they haven't earned for themselves.

_________________
In time, this too shall pass.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 10:32 am 
Offline
Noli me calcare
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:26 am
Posts: 4747
Müs wrote:
Lex Luthor wrote:
Hannibal wrote:
Maybe this will force a discussion on the estate rape that happens when someone dies. I just love that the goverment can walk up and say, "sorry for your loss, just cut us a check for half their stuff and we will let you grieve in peace".


I think right now it's not in vogue to care about the monetary grievances of the 1%.


This. I don't give a **** about the $800M monetary woes of multi billionaires.

You shouldn't, it's really none of your concern if they're multi-billionaires, or of they just have a family farm. It should be your concern that the Gov't feels it can take anyone's money.

Taskiss wrote:
Just to play devils advocate, what has one's descendants done to deserve one's estate that the government hasn't done?

Perhaps they have a child with health problems that will entail lifelong healthcare bills, perhaps they saved the parent's life from a deadly bunny rabbit attack...perhaps they don't want to leave a cent to their kids, and would rather fund the local home for hookers...

Taskiss wrote:
I would prefer to be able to direct the disposition of my estate without penalty or interference from the government... but that's my only gripe.

That's the point, it should be up to the decedent what happens to their money, not the Gov't.

Taskiss wrote:
I don't think my kids deserve a thing they haven't earned for themselves.

The Gov't doesn't agree with you there, either, but it should be your choice.

_________________
"Dress cops up as soldiers, give them military equipment, train them in military tactics, tell them they’re fighting a ‘war,’ and the consequences are predictable." —Radley Balko

Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:23 am 
Offline
Manchurian Mod
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 5866
My father is a strong opponent of inheritance taxes. Frankly, I don't give a flying **** what anyone else thinks about my worth regarding his legacy.

_________________
Buckle your pants or they might fall down.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 2:41 pm 
Offline
Commence Primary Ignition
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:59 am
Posts: 15740
Location: Combat Information Center
Taskiss wrote:
Just to play devils advocate, what has one's descendants done to deserve one's estate that the government hasn't done?

I would prefer to be able to direct the disposition of my estate without penalty or interference from the government... but that's my only gripe. I don't think my kids deserve a thing they haven't earned for themselves.


The problem with the question is that it assumes the question is one of "who deserves it"?

This has nothing to do with it; you are essentially asking the wrong question. The question is, what are the wishes of the person who's estate it was? If they wish to will it to the government, so be it. If they will it to their descendants, so be it. If they leave no will, society should assume they left it to their loved ones in accordance with normal human conduct.

Utilitarians might argue since the person is dead, that their interests no longer exist and can no longer be harmed, and that the ethical thing to do is confiscate it for the public good. This has 3 problems however:

1) Like most utilitarian arguments, it assumes that taking for the good of the many is ok whenever a person is unaware of it
2) It ignores the fact that if this is public policy, any person will be aware of it while alive, and thud the harm to their desire to take care of their family when gone is not actually avoided
3) It presumes that the public benefit from their wealth is greater than the benefit that their family will realize for no better reason than that the family is fewer people that the public. Like most utilitarian arguments, it violates its own precepts because simply counting people does not accurately weigh benefit and harm. A few descendants are likely to benefit significantly from 867 million dollars, but the size of the country as a whole is such that this money makes no meaningful difference to the public at large.
4) It ignores the public good in being able to provide for one's family. You may not believe your kids deserve what they haven't earned, but society at large disagrees.

_________________
"Hysterical children shrieking about right-wing anything need to go sit in the corner and be quiet while the adults are talking."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 2:56 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Huh.

There are no gift or estate taxes in Canada. I find the entire concept rather...horrifying.

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 12:29 pm 
Offline
Evil Bastard™
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:07 am
Posts: 7542
Location: Doomstadt, Latveria
Technically, you're supposed to file a 1099-R and declare all gift income in the United States. If the person who gave the gift paid the taxes, you must provide documentation of them paying the gift taxes. If they did not, you have to pay them. Likewise, the Obama Administration and Pelosi squeezed some changes through into Estate and Capital Gains Taxes that negatively impact most everyone. Honestly, I laugh every time some American liberal or talking head says we don't pay enough taxes in the United States. I laugh when they blame the Bush Tax Cuts but ignore the fact that Obama's payroll tax holiday "cost" us more money using their calculations than the Bush Tax Cuts have to date.

Oh well, I watch all these protests, read all these blogs, newspapers, magazines, watch these new digests, etc.; and in the end, I know how; I even know why. I figure soon we'll have a Democratization movement again in the United States, and just like every time prior ...

The poor will get poorer, lose more freedom, and have to shoulder more labor all while voting for their own "freedom".

_________________
Corolinth wrote:
Facism is not a school of thought, it is a racial slur.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 12:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
The United States is one of the lowest taxed first-world nations. As far as I know only Chile, Hong Kong, and Kuwait pay less, and Hong Kong isn't really a country. Taxes as a percentage of GDP in the US are under 25%, there are first world countries above 50%. I know you don't like that metric but I haven't seen a better one and I highly doubt a "better" way of measuring is going to affect the rankings much.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 12:58 pm 
Offline
Oberon's Playground
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 9449
Location: Your Dreams
Xequecal wrote:
The United States is one of the lowest taxed first-world nations. As far as I know only Chile, Hong Kong, and Kuwait pay less, and Hong Kong isn't really a country. Taxes as a percentage of GDP in the US are under 25%, there are first world countries above 50%. I know you don't like that metric but I haven't seen a better one and I highly doubt a "better" way of measuring is going to affect the rankings much.


Canadians pay much less tax than Americans. (It's not immediately apparent, but it's true.)

_________________
Well Ali Baba had them forty thieves, Scheherezade had a thousand tales
But master you in luck 'cause up your sleeves you got a brand of magic never fails...
...Mister Aladdin, sir, What will your pleasure be?
Let me take your order, Jot it down -You ain't never had a friend like me

█ ♣ █


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 2315
Talya wrote:
Xequecal wrote:
The United States is one of the lowest taxed first-world nations. As far as I know only Chile, Hong Kong, and Kuwait pay less, and Hong Kong isn't really a country. Taxes as a percentage of GDP in the US are under 25%, there are first world countries above 50%. I know you don't like that metric but I haven't seen a better one and I highly doubt a "better" way of measuring is going to affect the rankings much.


Canadians pay much less tax than Americans. (It's not immediately apparent, but it's true.)


The US pays 24-26% of its GDP in taxes, depending on which source you look at, (Heritage Foundation, OECD) while Canada is at 31-33%.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 313 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group